New Land Rover and LX question
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Texas
New Land Rover and LX question
Hey guys...
Just want some feedback on what you think of the new Land Rover that is to replace the older defunct Discovery. The reviews I've read on it so far have been very promising, and you guys being massive gear heads...well I wanted to hit you guys up.
I currently drive the GX470, and it's been great. Love it to no end, but I really wanted the LX. However, the LX is going through a design revision and I have no idea when the final product will be ready. Anyone got more info on this?
Like to hear your feedback...Rob
Just want some feedback on what you think of the new Land Rover that is to replace the older defunct Discovery. The reviews I've read on it so far have been very promising, and you guys being massive gear heads...well I wanted to hit you guys up.
I currently drive the GX470, and it's been great. Love it to no end, but I really wanted the LX. However, the LX is going through a design revision and I have no idea when the final product will be ready. Anyone got more info on this?
Like to hear your feedback...Rob
Pole Position
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Not sure about the new LX info, but Car & Driver has a nice test on the new Land Rover LR3 in the October 2004 issue. I like the styling, and the HP figures look great, but the price and MPG info are a bit of a turn off for me.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8522
good luck,
David
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8522
good luck,
David
Last edited by 99GS300; Sep 29, 2004 at 11:37 AM.
Driver School Candidate
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: California
Considering C&D placed it between the X5 and the RX330 in terms of sportiness and cushyness (if that's a word?), I think they've priced themselves out of the market at $73K. Even with all the nice technical toys, definitely not worth the money, IMO.
Pole Position
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally posted by singh99999
Considering C&D placed it between the X5 and the RX330 in terms of sportiness and cushyness (if that's a word?), I think they've priced themselves out of the market at $73K. Even with all the nice technical toys, definitely not worth the money, IMO.
Considering C&D placed it between the X5 and the RX330 in terms of sportiness and cushyness (if that's a word?), I think they've priced themselves out of the market at $73K. Even with all the nice technical toys, definitely not worth the money, IMO.
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Texas
I have to agree with the comments here. The new Rover appears to have priced itself out of its league. It appears they are competing directly with the GX470/LandCruiser. Not sure if that is such a great idea since the vehicle is so new, but it is jusing Jaguar's V8 motor. So who knows...great numbers but poor reliability...so instep with the Brits considering Jaguar just closed the original factory and I think Range Rover just shut down one of their factories bc of quality control. I hope this is not a common thing since the Aston Martin is such a beautiful creature!
I really hope the new LX is NOT a bloated Sequoia redone
. I've heard rumors of a new 5.x liter V8 in the works..that would be welcomed in a vehicle this heavy.
Thanks for the replies..Rob
I really hope the new LX is NOT a bloated Sequoia redone
. I've heard rumors of a new 5.x liter V8 in the works..that would be welcomed in a vehicle this heavy.Thanks for the replies..Rob
Trending Topics
Lead Lap
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Current LX still is fine. I've been critical of the LX in the past, but have learned the hard way that the LX is still the finest SUV there is. I don't think it needs a redesign, although it will get one soon. I just ordered a new 2005 LX, and have no problem with the fact a new one may be on the way in 2007. I'll enjoy it until then. The NAV in the new Land Rover SUCKS and it has terrible reliability history. IMO, the styling of the LX still is supreme. Get an LX or GX. You won't be sorry!!!!!
ClubLexus Stories
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Top 10 Most Confusing Things Lexus Has Ever Done!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Lexus ES Review: Lexus Re-Embraces Founding Principles
Michael S. Palmer
10 Lexus Bargains That are Cheaper Than a New Toyota RAV4
Joe Kucinski
8 Weirdest Things Lexus Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers
Joe Kucinski
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!
Joe Kucinski
Lead Lap
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: New York
hey,
found this old post while searching for info for the LR3.
have any one driven the LR3? how do you compare it to the GX470 ?
I think both have very similar specs and pricing ( ending up to abt $50-55k, when optioned).
It has won the MT truck of the year 2005 ... must be pretty good.
any comments? which one would you take if in the market for a new SUV (just between GX470 and LR3)?
tim
found this old post while searching for info for the LR3.
have any one driven the LR3? how do you compare it to the GX470 ?
I think both have very similar specs and pricing ( ending up to abt $50-55k, when optioned).
It has won the MT truck of the year 2005 ... must be pretty good.
any comments? which one would you take if in the market for a new SUV (just between GX470 and LR3)?
tim
Pole Position
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: California
IMHO, I'd take the GX over the LR3.
GX has a 4.7L engine vs LR3's 4.4
GX weighs 4871 lbs, and LR3 weighs between 5400 - 5800 lbs!!!
C/D guesstimate the mileage for the LR3 to be 12city/17highway mpg
and the GX gets 15/19.....I think.
And you can't beat Lexus reliability, I'm sure the new Rover is a whole lot better than the old Disco, but still might not be up to Lexus standards.
I saw a Top Gear clip testing the LR3, it does seems to have a ton of off-roading capabilities.
GX has a 4.7L engine vs LR3's 4.4
GX weighs 4871 lbs, and LR3 weighs between 5400 - 5800 lbs!!!
C/D guesstimate the mileage for the LR3 to be 12city/17highway mpg
and the GX gets 15/19.....I think.
And you can't beat Lexus reliability, I'm sure the new Rover is a whole lot better than the old Disco, but still might not be up to Lexus standards.
I saw a Top Gear clip testing the LR3, it does seems to have a ton of off-roading capabilities.
Last edited by TRD-bB; Jan 23, 2005 at 10:46 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lexor470
LX - 3rd Gen (2008-2021)
3
Sep 4, 2017 09:37 PM