View Full Version : Nissan Maxima - Deadliest mid sized car of 2005


O. L. T.
06-06-05, 02:49 AM
If someone finds a link, please post it.

EDIT: It was the national traffic and saftey administration who conducted the tests.

Watching world news tonight on CBS, I overheard the auto reports while working. In mid sized cars, the 2005 Nissan Maxima scored the lowest of all midsized cars in side impact safety. (I don't recall this being an issue on the new GS, which has been compared to the Maxima).

Someone from the auto crash test world that does all the tests (NTSA) conducted their yearly crash tests and found that passengers were most vulnerable in all mid sized cars while driving the 2005 Nissan Maxima. The lack of side impact saftey was so great there may be changes in the near future.

mmarshall
06-06-05, 06:20 AM
Gotta remember, though.................legally a mid-size car, by government standards, is determined by interior volume, not exterior length or width. The Toyota Prius, with its space efficiency, by the EPA is considered a mid-size car like the Maxima even though it is markedly smaller on the outside than a Maxima. That is why I take the results of these tests sometimes with a grain of salt....often times you end up comparing apples and oranges when you meant to do apples and apples. However, the Maxima's poor showing (especially compared to the much smaller Prius) is still worth noting.

Gojirra99
06-06-05, 07:39 AM
5 mid-sized cars TEST RESULTS (http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2005/06/05/115005.html)

mmarshall
06-06-05, 07:46 AM
Nice post, Amethy. :thumbup:
Looks like most, if not all of the cars in this test were more or less the same exterior size.
I would have expected Volvo to have been the clear winner but Audi has made many improvements in the last several years.

Also would have also been interesting to see how the Mercedes C or E-Classes...another nameplate known for safety....would have done in this group.

Gojirra99
06-06-05, 08:22 AM
INJURY MEASURES:

DRIVER Measures taken from the dummy indicate that rib fractures and/or internal organ injuries would be likely in a crash of this severity. A left leg fracture also would be possible.

REAR PASSENGER Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

HEAD PROTECTION:

DRIVER The dummy's head was protected from hitting any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof.

REAR PASSENGER The dummy's head was protected from hitting any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof. /end

Link : http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/side/s0510.htm#

flipside909
06-06-05, 09:52 AM
I guess the VQ is useless if the whole car is broad sided. I'm sure Nissan North America has sent out a rebuttal letter saying the IIHS' tests are biased.

bizzy928
06-06-05, 11:03 AM
Now that most manufacturers have the frontal impact tests taken care of, side impacts are the next area of concern. When purchasing a new car, side impact airbags (curtain + torso) are definately worth the investment. Its a shame though, in Canada most Toyota vehicles only offer side impact airbags on the top trim of the model (usually the XLE). For instance, if you wanted side airbags on a Sienna, you would have to get the XLE at ~$50000, whereas the Oddessy has them standard on the base model at ~32000. Something Toyota should definately pay attention to.

O. L. T.
06-06-05, 11:23 AM
I guess the VQ is useless if the whole car is broad sided. I'm sure Nissan North America has sent out a rebuttal letter saying the IIHS' tests are biased.
actually their response was "Our car performs to at least goverment standards".

1SICKLEX
06-06-05, 03:16 PM
The previous Maximas, not a coincidence, built in Japan, are built pretty damn solid. The new one is really a cheap, Lexus look, whale. Has anyone here sat inside let alone driven one? For $30,000, its almost laughable. The doors are as solid as paper, the plastic as thick as a condom on the dash. Nissan's profit on this car must be incredible. Its a large Altima chassis, same engine, almost no improvement in build quality. I just want to :cry: :cry: knowing this is what a "Maxima" is. THe name "Maxima" used to really mean something. Nissan has just crapped all over those loyal fans/owners with this barge.

O. L. T.
06-07-05, 12:45 PM
True that, mike!

LT. LEX
06-08-05, 12:39 PM
The Maxima guys are pretty bummed about the news.... :sad:

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=408886

O. L. T.
08-05-05, 06:25 PM
The Maxima guys are pretty bummed about the news.... :sad:

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=408886
Well, with good reason though.

chuckb
08-05-05, 09:53 PM
off topic but regarding the 05 Maxima, has anyone noticed how low the car looks because of how small the wheel gaps are stock? I must admit I'm a bit jealous of that(and only that ;) )

XeroK00L
08-05-05, 09:57 PM
The previous Maximas, not a coincidence, built in Japan, are built pretty damn solid. The new one is really a cheap, Lexus look, whale. Has anyone here sat inside let alone driven one? For $30,000, its almost laughable. The doors are as solid as paper, the plastic as thick as a condom on the dash. Nissan's profit on this car must be incredible. Its a large Altima chassis, same engine, almost no improvement in build quality. I just want to :cry: :cry: knowing this is what a "Maxima" is. THe name "Maxima" used to really mean something. Nissan has just crapped all over those loyal fans/owners with this barge.At least the Maxima forum's got a good smiley for your new gang, Sick. So what name are you gonna give him?:D
http://forums.maxima.org/images/smilies/mofoismad0cn.gif

Stage3
08-05-05, 10:47 PM
Nissan needs to get over it and make the Maxima a RWD... :thumbup:

XeroK00L
08-05-05, 11:00 PM
Nissan needs to get over it and make the Maxima a RWD... :thumbup:And it's called the M35.;)

O. L. T.
08-06-05, 02:38 AM
At least three of those posts behind mine are O/T so let's keep rolling with the safety report topic. With some strain between the I,N, and L lately in the forums staying on topic is a bit more manditory than ever.

RA40
08-06-05, 01:47 PM
The previous Maximas, not a coincidence, built in Japan, are built pretty damn solid. The new one is really a cheap, ....<snip> THe name "Maxima" used to really mean something. Nissan has just crapped all over those loyal fans/owners with this barge.

I used to have an '82 and '85. IMO, when they went to FWD...the car began the downhill journey. The '85 was reasonably nice but to me it didn't have the feel of being their top US offering. It was very different than the MX83 Cressidas which thankfully remained RWD.

Each time it came to considering a new ride, the crash tests of the Maxima crossed it off my list quickly. Very sad.