Nissan's saviour Ghosn rejects calls to quit
June 20, 2007 - 9:05PM
Carlos Ghosn, the legendary chief executive who rescued Nissan Motor Corp, on Wednesday refused to resign and defended his record after net profits slipped for the first time under him.
"As long as I have the shareholders' trust and the employees' trust, I will remain," Ghosn said after a sometimes hostile shareholders conference here.
The globetrotting Ghosn was parachuted into Nissan in 1999 as the first foreigner to head a major Japanese company, winning over a loyal fan base by turning the firm from bankruptcy to high profits.
But he was confronted by a small-level shareholder who called on the company's onetime saviour to quit over the last earnings report.
"A failure? The result of fiscal year 2006 is one of the best results that Nissan has ever done," Ghosn told the shareholder.
Nissan's net profit fell 11.1 percent in the fiscal year to March 31, the first time the company failed to meet its targets since Ghosn's arrival.
The fall came just after Ghosn, a Brazilian-born Frenchman of Lebanese descent, took the reins in 2005 of France's Renault, which holds a controlling stake in Nissan. Ghosn has since divided his time between Japan, France and the United States.
Ghosn has talked of a "performance crisis" at Nissan and taken a series of measures in recent months, including reshuffling top management and laying off 1,150 workers in a restructuring of the commercial division in Japan. Another 1,500 positions will be eliminated at Japanese factories through voluntary retirements.
"We have to recognise our failure, to analyse it and to react," Ghosn said.
But he told the 2,100 shareholders assembled in Yokohama to put the problems in perspective.
"The problems we are facing today are very small compared to the problems we had in 1999," he said.
"The negative articles we are reading today are a piece of cake compared to those in 1999, 2000 and 2001," he said.
"Nissan is still a hugely profitable company, let's not forget about that," he said, while adding, "I understand and I share your frustration."
Ghosn has faced particular criticism from shareholders for his open scepticism about hybrid technology -- which Japanese rivals Toyota and Honda have pioneered.
Nissan announced in late 2005 that it was working on its first hybrid vehicle to meet demand, but Ghosn has insisted that the cost benefits of the cars have not been proven.
"The hybrid is still today a niche technology. It's a fact. The numbers show it," Ghosn said.
He said hybrids were pitted "head to head" in the US market against new clean diesel technologies, which Nissan is also working on.
"When you go to the market, the decisions are going to be in function of the customers' reaction to the two technologies. Frankly, it is not obvious today," Ghosn said.
Hybrid vehicles, which run on a conventional gasoline (petrol) engine combined with an electric motor, consume less fuel and are considered environment friendly, although pricy.
When Ghosn took over, Nissan was a "keiretsu," a clogged group of Japanese businesses which are closely linked and often own equity in one another.
His first revival plan called for slashing purchasing costs by 20 percent in three years, goals that were all met a year ahead of schedule.
© 2007 AFP
This story is sourced direct from an overseas news agency as an additional service to readers. Spelling follows North American usage, along with foreign currency and measurement units.
.
Quality is still very sub-par.
More trouble lies ahead.
Infiniti had the quality back then, but their exterior design led to low sales figure. Infiniti of today doesn't quite have the same quality, but their designs are beautiful.
Quality is still very sub-par.
More trouble lies ahead.
Quality is still very sub-par.
More trouble lies ahead.
Quality is still very sub-par.
More trouble lies ahead.
I would agree that the competition has caught up, but I wouldn't say "passed" their strong points. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the G35 (entry level model) have an ipod connection available yet the GS350/450h/430 (executive class) does not? Infiniti engines also match up very well to other V6 & V8 models within the same class (not to mention the new 3.7 & 5.0 which are coming soon). Infinitis are still chock full of features and have superb driving characteristics. So therefore, your statement confuses me.
Would you care to elaborate on how the competition has specifically passed their strong points?
Last edited by LetMeShowU; Jun 21, 2007 at 03:15 AM.
Trending Topics
Would you care to elaborate on how the competition has specifically passed their strong points?

How about Nissan has to buy old Toyota tech for hybrids? THat is technology, not a data port, lol.
Outside of maybe the lane departure system, there is nothing leading about Infiniti tech. Same back up cameras, NAV, and some bright LEDs as everyone. Heck they still use Bose stereos.
How about making an automatic transmission past 5 speeds, lol. Lexus has 6 and 8. Benz 7. BMW has SMG. Audi DSG.
No radar cruise, no LED headlights, no RWD CVT cars, the LS itself debuted I think 8 or 12 world firsts.
Nissan is known for catchy styling and fast engines.
The Camry for instance is very styled now and just as fast as an Altima.
The Rav-4 is faster than any Nissan SUV and on par with a FX 45.
The Tundra outmuscles and out tows and out styles a Titan. 382hp
There is no more competitive edge from Nissan, thus the huge rebates and lease deals.
Not saying its bad, they are better than some other companies but again, the competition is there.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Yes, it was an oversight on the part of Lexus, not a supplier thing

Well, that was more of a different strategy on the part of Nissan vs. Toyota. I know Ghosn in particular had talked about how he didn't see hybrid technology as something that would pay off in the long run. Perhaps they just choose to go into a different direction (i.e. diesels, etc) instead of focusing on hybrids for fuel economy as Toyota has done. The next generation Nissan Maxima is supposed to have a diesel engine, so we will see.
Infiniti had backup cameras before Lexus/Toyota

The 2002 Q45 featured the new backup camera technology, did you forget?
With all of the problems the Toyota Camry & Lexus ES transmissions have had recently, it probably isn't wise to compare them to the Nissan/Infiniti trannys. You may think the Infiniti/Nissan 5 speed automatic is old technology, but if at the end of the day, it works well and does what it's supposed to (without breaking down), then who cares? Personally, I would prefer a reliable 5 speed than an unreliable 6 speed, but hey that's just me.
Fact is, a "turnaround" is the hardest thing for a new CEO to do in any industry. How many new CEOs come to a failing mega corporation and make it profitable in just a few years? I can't really name many others.
As for the "not much else" part...
Let's see, pre-Ghosn, Infiniti has mediocre-at-best products like the I30, G20 and QX4, and the company is seriously considering killing the brand.
Post-Ghosn:
G35 Sedan: Best selling RWD Japanese sedan in its class
G35 Coupe: Best selling coupe in its class
M35/45: Best selling Japanese sedan in its class (barely, so far this year)
FX: Not a volume seller like the MDX and RX, but was never meant to be, as a niche RWD-based crossover with a serious emphasis on sport over utility
We'll see what they with the next Q.
Nissan has a slew of new products that have come or are coming. We'll see how they do.
Of course, Nissan has made some flops like the Titan, but which company doesn't have some crappy products?
The company's profits slip for the first time in years (mind you, it's still hugely positive), and it's a "fact" that he's only good at a couple things? Please...
I'm no fanboy of Ghosn, and it may be that Ghosn is "merely" good at turnarounds, but it's too soon to judge.
Last edited by carguy101; Jun 21, 2007 at 12:55 PM.

So your singing Nissan's praises b/c the GS does not have an I-pod connector...I am laughing.
Well, that was more of a different strategy on the part of Nissan vs. Toyota. I know Ghosn in particular had talked about how he didn't see hybrid technology as something that would pay off in the long run. Perhaps they just choose to go into a different direction (i.e. diesels, etc) instead of focusing on hybrids for fuel economy as Toyota has done. The next generation Nissan Maxima is supposed to have a diesel engine, so we will see.
The FACT is, they didn't they couldn't they have not. They know how to put one engine in 20 different cars/trucks etc but not how to make a true advancement like hybrid technology.
Infiniti had backup cameras before Lexus/Toyota

The 2002 Q45 featured the new backup camera technology, did you forget?
Yes, they did. The Q45 also had the world's brightest headlights, lol. The Q45 is also an 18 year failure and discontinued, while the LS is considered one of the FINEST cars built.
With all of the problems the Toyota Camry & Lexus ES transmissions have had recently, it probably isn't wise to compare them to the Nissan/Infiniti trannys. You may think the Infiniti/Nissan 5 speed automatic is old technology, but if at the end of the day, it works well and does what it's supposed to (without breaking down), then who cares? Personally, I would prefer a reliable 5 speed than an unreliable 6 speed, but hey that's just me.

You got to be kidding me. The funny thing is even with some tranny troubles, Toyota is ranked highly for reliability, NIssan CONTINUES to be far sub-par in reliability reports year after year. Infiniti continues to go further down the report in quality. Lexus had a 5 speed back in 1998. Its almost 10 years later, they have 2 CVTs, a 6 and worlds first 8 speed. Nissan has an ancient 5 speed. That is not advancement, that is laziness and being complacent.
Fact is, a "turnaround" is the hardest thing for a new CEO to do in any industry. How many new CEOs come to a failing mega corporation and make it profitable in just a few years? I can't really name many others.
As for the "not much else" part...
Let's see, pre-Ghosn, Infiniti has mediocre-at-best products like the I30, G20 and QX4, and the company is seriously considering killing the brand.
Post-Ghosn:
G35 Sedan: Best selling RWD Japanese sedan in its class
G35 Coupe: Best selling coupe in its class
M35/45: Best selling Japanese sedan in its class (barely, so far this year)
FX: Not a volume seller like the MDX and RX, but was never meant to be, as a niche RWD-based crossover with a serious emphasis on sport over utility
We'll see what they with the next Q.
Nissan has a slew of new products that have come or are coming. We'll see how they do.
Of course, Nissan has made some flops like the Titan, but which company doesn't have some crappy products?
The company's profits slip for the first time in years (mind you, it's still hugely positive), and it's a "fact" that he's only good at a couple things? Please...
I'm no fanboy of Ghosn, and it may be that Ghosn is "merely" good at turnarounds, but it's too soon to judge.
Quality also suffered for a bit, but it's now on a solid upswing. Take a look a the interiors of the new G35, M, FX, and Altima, and they're pretty nice. Not as refined and "soft" as Lexus, but very nice nontheless.











