When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It is a modified car, so it should not count. The Veyron is stock.
I would disagree. While the Veyron is unchanged as it left the "factory", it is made in the same small numbers as the Hennessey, it is not manufactured on an assembly line, and is in effect "tuned".
1 - that's a terrible time for the Veyron. Those things typically run 0-200 in the 19 to 20 second range... almost never over 20 seconds unless the driver is clueless. Either they screwed up driving that car or else something was wrong with it.
2- Hennessey has a grade-A douche bag with more pending lawsuits and people who'd like to see him dead than quite literally anyone else that I know of in this country. He ONLY gets business through magazines that promote his product. His word of mouth reputation is as bad as it can possibly be...
Impressive as the Viper is I would a rather have the Veyron. The Viper above is highly modified and would rather own a car that is designed from the ground up to be a supercar. But, that is just me. Of course there is a slight price difference and that is more of a ,"how capable is a mod'd Viper" vs. a real comparison.
1 - that's a terrible time for the Veyron. Those things typically run 0-200 in the 19 to 20 second range... almost never over 20 seconds unless the driver is clueless. Either they screwed up driving that car or else something was wrong with it.
Uh... so what exactly was the point of providing a link to the very same article where the poor time was originally derived? To show, through the text of the article, what they said about the car? Is that proof that they drove it to its greatest ability and/or that everything was working on the car? Nope.
Multiple 0-200 runs have been recorded in the Veyron showing sub-20 second times.
That's a fact.
R&T came in a full 4-5 seconds worse than that. That's not the results a simple variability in tune or weather conditions. That's either driver error, or something wrong with the car, or both.
Plus he's very rude and obnoxious. He often e-thugs when members of a forum do not agree with him. Dont be surprise to find rude remarks coming out of him.
Uh... so what exactly was the point of providing a link to the very same article where the poor time was originally derived? To show, through the text of the article, what they said about the car? Is that proof that they drove it to its greatest ability and/or that everything was working on the car? Nope.
the point was that the driver was Steve Millen, and he knows what he was doing, that's a fact.
Originally Posted by Threxx
Multiple 0-200 runs have been recorded in the Veyron showing sub-20 second times.
care to post some of these times, we're talking mph here.