Man arrested for shooting traffic camera
Police have lost red-light cameras to traffic accidents but never to gun play. "This is the first one that's been shot," Capt. Gordon Catlett said of the wounded camera at the intersection of Broadway Avenue and Interstate 640 — one of 15 camera-equipped intersections in the city.
Clifford E. Clark, 47, was charged with felony vandalism and reckless endangerment for allegedly firing at least three rounds from a .30-06 hunting rifle at the camera, knocking it out of action.
He was arrested after patrol officers heard shots around 2 a.m. Sunday, spotted a minivan leaving the parking lot of a closed business and pulled it over. Inside they found Clark and the high-powered rifle.
Clark, now facing a $50 fine if convicted and loss of his rifle, refused to say anything about the incident to police, leaving the motive unclear.
Catlett, who oversees the red-light camera program, said 6,798 drivers have been photographed running the red light at Broadway and I-640 and ticketed since the camera was installed in 2006. Clark was not one of them, he said
http://www.knoxnews.com/
GO HIM!!!
Honestly, I don't know why a lot more of them haven't received pot-shots. When they first came out, I expected to see most of them taken out sooner or later. That hasn't happened.....I was wrong.
(I also want to emphasize that I myself don't condone that action, only that I expected more of it)
at least here in Socal...red light violations are RAMPANT--especially for dedicated left turns. During the day it's possible that anywhere from 3-5 cars will pass AFTER the oncoming traffic's light has turned Green. a few cities here and there have adopted red-light cameras to great effect. Where I live (Torrance) the red light violations are quite bad with out large intersections (Hawthorne Blvd. is bigger than a lot of freeways, for example), not to mention quite dangerous.
Trending Topics
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
I'm surprised those suckers dont snap at Yellow..
NYC lovesss getting revenue from tickets!
at least here in Socal...red light violations are RAMPANT--especially for dedicated left turns. During the day it's possible that anywhere from 3-5 cars will pass AFTER the oncoming traffic's light has turned Green. a few cities here and there have adopted red-light cameras to great effect. Where I live (Torrance) the red light violations are quite bad with out large intersections (Hawthorne Blvd. is bigger than a lot of freeways, for example), not to mention quite dangerous.
IMO these things are just used to generate revenue and annoy the general public while they think it'll decrease the rate of an accident, in a way, yes, in that particular intersection maybe, but people will speed up and not care anymore after they passed that intersection...(plus they usually put them in odd corners)
What I think they should do for those cameras is change them from snapping pictures only if a car ran a red, to record the intersection 24/7.
Usually, when you are already in the intersection when it is yellow, the camera doesn't go off--as it shouldn't. If it does, I would say that would be good grounds to contest. From what I have seen personally, the cameras work nominally: catching the guys who run reds and letting the innocents off (i.e. if you are already stuck in the middle of the intersection when it's yellow, you don't get a ticket).
No problems thus far.
this is a upper-middle class city with primarily Caucasians residents with the Asian-American community following somewhere behind. You know, one of those cities that kind of shut down after 9 PM because everyone's asleep for the day at work tomorrow...it's rarely ever the immigrants who drive like they don't have to follow the big red light which means STOP.







