When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was in the San Jose airport a week ago, in terminal A, on the way to gate 10, and there is a big M3 poster on the wall. I didn't think anything of it other than it stated:
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 5.2 seconds
I'm trying to remember, but it actually could have been 5.4 seconds - I really didn't think to take a picture, but it was there.
Now, an ad in April's Road & Track (page 8):
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 4.8 seconds
And I also have the April issue of Car & Driver (page 10):
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 4.7 seconds
Is there a problem with what the car can really do? All of these numbers are slower than the advertised 0-60 for the IS-F, so that's good, but geez at least get your story straight BMW.
I was in the San Jose airport a week ago, in terminal A, on the way to gate 10, and there is a big M3 poster on the wall. I didn't think anything of it other than it stated:
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 5.2 seconds
I'm trying to remember, but it actually could have been 5.4 seconds - I really didn't think to take a picture, but it was there.
Now, an ad in April's Road & Track (page 8):
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 4.8 seconds
And I also have the April issue of Car & Driver (page 10):
414 horsepower V-8
0-60 in 4.7 seconds
Is there a problem with what the car can really do? All of these numbers are slower than the advertised 0-60 for the IS-F, so that's good, but geez at least get your story straight BMW.
Desi
hmm i have the road and track from march 2008 and it says in feburary they ran a 4.1 0-60 and a 12.5 @ 114.8 1/4 mile
well some manufacturers like to be conservative with their numbers...
magazines tests will vary upon conditions and how they launch...
but i believe most magazines have found the IS-F faster
Where have you seen that? I see most testers get 0-60 of 4.8 on the IS, and around 4.5 on the M3. I even saw a drag race between an RS4 and an IS-F and the RS4 won, and the M3 is faster than the RS4.
Where have you seen that? I see most testers get 0-60 of 4.8 on the IS, and around 4.5 on the M3. I even saw a drag race between an RS4 and an IS-F and the RS4 won, and the M3 is faster than the RS4.
I think the RS4 vs the IS-F was done by Edmunds, which can't seem to drive the IS-F correctly...heh...so I will wait for test done by major magazines between all the performance sedans....(M3, C63, RS4, CTS-V, IS-F)
Regardless of what the numbers are, can you really go wrong with any of the cars in this category.
All comes down to personal preference IMHO. Is it that important to get .2 secs more from the line than the competitor? Remember, most of these numbers are completed on a track by someone who does this for a living. Real world conditions and on the streets will vary a lot more.
I'm just happy to be able to afford a car in this category.
I'm just happy to be able to afford a car in this category.
Tell me about it. And the competitive pricing is allowing a lot more people to afford these awesome cars, too. It's a good time to be a performance luxury entry-level car fan!
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Slideshow: A five-car lineup spanning more than five decades of Toyota performance and engineering will tackle one of Italy's most celebrated automotive routes.