View Full Version : Review: 2008 Acura TL Type-S 6MT


mmarshall
07-05-08, 07:18 PM
By multiple CL member request, a review of the 2008 Acura TL Type-S 6-speed manual transmission.


http://www.acura.com/index.aspx?initPath=TL



http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/81147/2007-Acura-TL-Type-S-i005.jpg

http://newcarbuyingguide.com/images/articles/reviews/acura/2008AcuraTL01.jpg

http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/81147/2007-Acura-TL-Type-S-i003.jpg

http://us.autos1.yimg.com/img.autos.yahoo.com/izp/acura_tl_types6spdmtwperformancetires_2008_dashboa rd_dashboard_640x480.jpg

http://us.autos1.yimg.com/img.autos.yahoo.com/izp/acura_tl_5spdatwnavigationsystem_2008_interior_rea rseat_640x480.jpg

http://image.automotive.com/f/miscellaneous/2008-acura-tl-continues-to-take-on-bmw-infiniti-lexus/7143596+w630+cr1+re0+ar1/2008-acura-tl-type-s-enginejpg.jpg




http://www.harmonyacura.com/images/type-s_emblem_grey.gif



In a Nutshell: Slick, well-engineered, well-built, and generally attractive, but low-RPM engine response and brakes need a little improvement.



I received multiple CL member requests for a review of the new TL Type-S, preferably the 6-speed manual, and I apologize for not being able to get to it until now. First, nature intervened, to some extent, by giving me a swollen, painful right elbow (my main computer arm) from mouse and computer overuse/strain....that has taken weeks to heal, and is still not quite perfect. Second, I had a standing request from one of my pastors for a VW Passat 2.0T review (for his possible purchase)....I took care of that last week (see my mini-review) with a shortened, simpler written review to save strain on my elbow. Third, Type-S models with the 6-speed manual are not particularly easy to find.....dealerships usually only get one or two of them a month, and they don't last long. But, this morning, a local Acura shop had an un-spoken-for white one available, so I hopped into my Outback and off I went.........you guys have been waiting long enough, and no more excuses. My right elbow, while still not perfect, is good enough, in conjunction with my good left elbow, for a reasonable-length review. And, obviously, I also needed a good right elbow for the manual shift lever. So, let's get on with it......although, in the meantime, Mike (1SICKGOAT) was already written and posted some about the car himself....as usual, quite well.

Most of you who have followed my posts and reviews over time know that the TL, in general, has not been one of my favorite vehicles. In the past, I personally have found the TL to be rather bland, noisy, boring to drive, lacking in personality, and with rather unimpressive interior/trim quality. In a number of ways, I thought the smaller Acura TSX, the Honda Accord, and larger Acura RL were more impressive cars...........especially the rock-solid RL with its superlative SH-AWD, which I had (and still have) an extremely high opinion of. In addition, the TL was plagued with defective automatic transmissions for several years.........those of you who got stuck with lemons know just what I'm talking about, though, to be fair, Acuras are normally quite reliable; more so than most makes.


That, however, was in the past. Today's TL, at least in the Type-S format, is a marked improvement, as you can see by my relatively long list of PLUSSES and short list of MINUSES. I always go into an auto review with an open and objective mind, because, otherwise, you guys are not getting a fair and unbiased view, but simply my own pre-conceived prejudices. After reviews, I honestly was not impressed with former TL's, and I honestly AM more impressed with this one. Acura has done a number of improvements in the latest model, though there are still a couple of flies in the ointment....details, of course, below. And to an extent, the new TL, at least in my view, seems better now than before simply due to the fact that its new brother 2009 TSX is (IMO) such a let-down and disappointment over the superb former 2008 TSX. The new 2009 TSX, in my view, is no longer necessarily a better buy than the 2008 TL. Such was not the case with the 2008 TSX, which I thought, was clearly better than past TL's.

In the American market, Acura, for 2008, markets 2 versions of the TL, base and Type-S. Base TL's have a 3.2L V6 (258 HP/233 ft.-lbs.) and a 5-speed sport-shift automatic; Type-S models have a 3.5L V6 (286 HP/256 ft.-lbs.) with either a 6-speed close-ratio manual or the above-mentioned 5-speed automatic, with paddle shifters unique to the Type-S. (You guys, of course, wanted the Type S with manual). The Type-S package also includes larger Brembo brakes, though the peaky torque curve of the 3.5L V6 and the feel of the brake pedal are, IMO, two of its notable weaknesses.

So now, let's take a look at the car in detail:





Model Reviewed: 2008 Acura TL Type-S 6-speed Manual


Base Price: $38,225

Major Options: None

Destination/Freight: $760

List Price as Reviewed: $38,985



Drivetrain: FWD, transversely-mounted 3.5L SOHC VTEC V6, 286 HP @ 6200 RPM, torque 256 ft.lbs @ 5000 RPM, close-ratio 6-speed manual
transmission with limited-slip differential.


EPA Mileage Ratings: 18 city, 27 Highway



Exterior Color: White Diamond Pearl

Interior: Two-tone Ebony/Silver leather





PLUSSES: :thumbup:


Swiss-Watch build/assembly precision inside and out.

Long 6/70 Acura drivetrain and 4/50 bumper-to-bumper warranties.

Smooth, quiet engine.

Smooth clutch.

Slick, silky-smooth, short-throw shift linkage.

Flat cornering.

Good steering feel and response for a FWD vehicle.

Superlative paint job.

Classy if somewhat dull paint colors.

Less clownlike grille than on other new Acura models.

Good front and rear legroom.

Attractive 2-tone leather seats and 2-tone carbon-fiber interior trim.

Smart-looking, handsome primary gauges.

Well-designed controls and buttons except on steering wheel and NAV/stereo.

Nice stereo sound.

Good road/wind noise isolation.

Well-finished trunk.

Good exterior and interior hardware/trim.

Classy, subdued sport-sedan body features.

Solid body panels/sheet metal.

Hold-up struts for the hood.

Fairly good underhood access for a tight-fitting V6.






MINUSES: :thumbdn:



6-speed manuals relatively hard to find.

Engine torque curve too peaky for a sports sedan.

Somewhat spongy brake pedal.

Ugly (IMO) alloy wheels.

Temporary spare tire/wheel.

Tight rear headroom for tall people.

Too many (?) buttons on the steering wheel.

Premium gas required.






EXTERIOR:

The exterior, as you first walk up to it, looks much like past TL's, and, fortunately, does not have the garish, clownlike, "V" grille of some newer Acuras. It has the more subdued, traditional, trapezoid-shaped Acura grille of the past, which, IMO, is far better-looking (I don't know what's with auto stylists these days that they think they have to make vehicles look like they belong in a circus). The TL, to my eyes, is a fairly good-looking sedan, though I don't particularly like the way the stylists have done the lower-side-body flarings on the Type-S.....to me, it makes the sides look a little too slab-like. I also didn't like the (IMO) rather ugly, semi-honeycomb-shaped, smoke-gray alloy wheels, which, to my tastes, looked rather awkward on this car. If I owned this car, those wheels would be the first thing to go, provided I could find better-looking, exact-sized, factory-approved replacements which would not void the warranty. In fact, I'd probably ask the dealership to do a swap with the regular, base TL's wheels/tires, which are the EXACT same size (P235/45 R17) and are (IMO) far better-looking, silver, traditional 5-spokers.

Having said that, however, IMO, the car, in general, is fairly nice-looking......I have certainly seen lots worse. The body lines, except for the afore-mentioned lower-side flarings, are well-done, and, unlike the boy-racer look of some youthful sport sedans (The Type-S, of course, IS marketed as as a FWD sport sedan), has a mature, subdued, classy look....you're not going to confuse it with a Subaru STi or Mitsubishi Evo. Instead of a tall, garish wing, A small, low, body-colored spoiler on the rear of the trunk lid and a small red/white/black "Type S" logo quietly announce to the world (and to traffic cops) that this is not Grandma's TL.

And Acura certainly did not skimp with the paint. The Type-S has one of the best non-Lexus paint jobs I have seen....smooth as a baby's butt, virtually free of orange-peel, and even as a mirror surface, though the White Diamond color on my test car naturally didn't have the deep reflective gloss that many darker colors have. The Type-S (and base TL) paint color choice, to best describe it, is somewhat classy but dull.....you won't find yellows, bright reds, oranges, etc...

Nor did Acura skimp on exterior material quality. The body panels, hood, trunk, etc....did not feel quite as solid or tanklike as last week's VW Passat, but were nevertheless solid and of high-quality, and mounted and aligned with a Swiss-Watch precision and small panel gaps that outdid even the VW's. Doors, hood, and trunk lid open and close with a precision solidness that shows this is a Honda-designed product. All exterior trim and mirrors are well-done, solid, and of high quality. Underhood, nice struts hold things up instead of the new TSX's El Cheapo prop-rod.




UNDERHOOD:

Open the hood (I've already mentioned the nice struts), and the 3.5L, transversely-mounted V6 and 6-speed manual fit in OK, with at least some room to work on the front side of the engine despite the large, ubuquitous plastic engine cover and the plastic-covered components on each side of it. It's a fairly tight, but not overly tight, fit, and some components, such as the oxygen sensor, can easily be reached in the space between the back of the radiator, engine fan, and engine block. Dipsticks and fluid reserviors are handily accessable, but the battery is hidden under a cover. An underhood insulation pad helps quell some of the engine noise and helps with the car's quiet ride.........more on that below. (Of course, as a sports sedan, it's not supposed to be excessively quiet like a Lexus LS460).




INTERIOR:

Inside, you know immediately you are in a well-made, classy interior. The handsome, two-tone dark gray/light gray leather seats (Taupe is also available on The Type S) in my test car were comfortable and had a nice grade of leather (not quite as soft-grade leather as in a Lexus or Jaguar). The side bolstering was a little flat, though, for a sport sedan. I also liked the classy looks of the clear, white-on-black primary gauges and their red trim rings. The steering wheel, with its proper three-spoke design, had a nice, smooth leather covering, but had, IMO, too many buttons mounted on it .......it was easy to hit one of the buttons inadvertantly flipping the wheel around or if, like me, you sometimes subconsciously rest your hand on or grip the spoke flaring. Not a bad design per se, but one where you have to be careful how you hold the wheel, that's all. Like in the VW Passat last week, it may take some fiddling with the power seats and tilt wheel for a big/tall person (I am 6' 2" and 260 lbs.) to get comfortable and have their knees clear the lower part of the front dash. Headroom, with the sunroof housing, was OK in front and marginal in the rear for a tall person........legroom was good, both front and rear, for both tall and short persons.

I normally prefer wood trim, which does not come in the Type-S (only the base TL), but there was no denying that the two-tone silver/gray carbon-fiber trim on the dash and door panels was super-classy and extremely well-done; I would be as happy with it as with the wood. All of the interior hardware and trim was made of relatively high-quality materials (no cheap dime-store stuff for the TL). I was also quite impressed with the TL's control layout, except for the afore-mentioned steering-wheel buttons and the somewhat more-complex-than-usual (for a Honda-Acura design) operation of the integrated stereo/NAV unit buttons/controls (standard on the Type-S). The NAV's cursor is moved by a very small, joystick/button-shaped control under the screen that is somewhat awkward to grasp and swivel around. The stereo itself, while not quite the Lexus Mark Levinson for sophistication (I often use the Mark Levinson units as the auto-industry benchmark) had better-than-average sound quality, as, of course, a car of this class should have.

All in all, a quite nicely-done interior, far better, IMO, than previous TL's.




CARGO AREA/TRUNK:

Lift the high-quality trunk lid and you are greeted with a reasonably large, well-finished trunk, which is lined with a semi-plush, medium-gray color carpeting. Like most of today's sedans, the raked rear roofline cuts into the size of the trunk opening, but it is large enough to accomodate reasonably-sized luggage and cargo, and there is adequate space under the lid going back to the rear seatbacks. Here, though, is where the Acura bean-counters recovered some of the money back that was spent on the car's otherwise high-quality components. The rear seats themselves don't fold down, but instead have a small, pass-through, flip-down hole to accomodate long items such as skis and fishing poles. And, underneath the trunk floor, you will find a full-size, though temporary, spare tire/wheel instead of the real spare tire/wheel that, IMO, would be more proper in a car of this class. Still, it beats the cheap Fix-a Flat compressed-air bottle that some cars nowadays give you...yes, some cars at almost twice this price.





ON THE ROAD:

Start the 3.5L V6 up with a conventional-style metal key with electronic transponder (oddly, no engine START/STOP button like in some competitors) and, at once, the usual (and expected) Honda-Acura silky-smooth, quiet idle kicks in...this engine idles as eerie-smooth as many Lexus powerplants. Warm it up a minute, though, and hit the road, and you notice one problem right away.....the low RPM lack of torque and delayed throttle response that is a characteristic of so many VTEC Honda/Acura-designed motors, even with manual transmissions which are inherently more efficient than automatics. This motor is no exception........a peek at its torque curve shows max torque at 5000 RPM, well above the range that most American drivers rev to in their daily driving habits. Now, mind you, this engine is not exactly slow, and if you give it enough revs (being a brand-new engine, I didn't take it above 4500), you do start to feel a shove in the back around 4000 or so. But such all-or-nothing torque characteristics, IMO, are not desirable or fitting in a purpose-designed sport sedan. This is one area where the American-nameplate sport sedan/muscle cars like the Pontiac G8 GT (actually an Australian design with an American engine), Dodge Charger, and Chevy Impala SS are superior to many (not all) of their foreign-nameplate competitors....the American-nameplate sport sedans generally provide more instantaneous, low-RPM torque, though, in FWD V8 sport sedans like the Impala SS, that can mean a lot of torque steer. Still, though the low-RPM torque could be better (the VW Passat's 2.0L turbo 4, to me, actually felt stonger in that RPM range), the Type-S 3.5L is still no slouch if you give it some gas...it will get out of its own way. And, also characteristic of Honda/Acura engines, the 3.5L is smooth and quiet at speed, with silky-smooth power delivery. It is best described as a touring engine, rather than a classic unrefined Friday-Night drag-strip engine for dusting off Mustangs and Corvettes.

And the 6-speed manual transmission is a real jewel. I dare say that (arguably) Honda and Acura make the best FWD manual transmissions and shift linkages on the planet. I have yet to see one that didn't shift like a (to use the old cliche) a Swiss Watch....this one, not surprisingly, was no exception, although you sometimes have to be careful on the 5-6 upshift that you don't catch 4th by mistake (that won't do a brand-new engine much good). I was alert, caught it in a split-second, and didn't overrev the new engine. That 5-6 shift will probably get better with break-in miles. The clutch was generally smooth and problem-free, engaging right in the zone you would expect it to.....not with the pedal too low or too high off the floor. Some of the older Honda manuals had tall gearing more for fuel economy than performance (my brother's old Civic CX was like that) and, while jewel-like in their shifting like all Honda FWD manuals, required a lot of clutch-slipping to get them rolling from a start. That was certainly not the case with the Type-S....just give it a few RPM's, let the clutch out reasonably carefully, and go. Those of you (most of you, in fact), who requested the 6MT version rather than the sport-shift automatic for the review.........your request, IMO, is justified. This transmission and clutch, IMO, is silky enough that it's a pleasure to use, even with the traditional inconvenience and hassle of a manual transmission in heavy stop-and-go traffic (many people still want the automatic, though, and, silky linkage or not, an automatic or clutchless-manual may still be worth it in really bad traffic).

So much for the drivetrain.........how does the chassis and suspension do? Overall, pretty well, although, with the FWD set-up, one does not expect, or get, BMW-sharp steering feel and response. The steering, however, is good by FWD standards, and it is roughly the same feel and response as the Honda Accord EX-L V6 coupe I tested in January...a system I was generally pleased with. Cornering response is initially sight understeer, with a well-snubbed lack of body roll, though, of course, not as flat or quick as with low-slung RWD sports cars. Steering feel is a little firmer than your typical Camry/Sonata/non-EX Accord class of sedan, but it seems to be more a built-in slight hydraulic firmness in the power steering valves, rather than a true natural feel like the superb telepathic BMW systems. Ride comfort is a little on the firm side for my tastes (as with most cars these days), but, by the standards of many of today's drivers, is not bad at all, and only borderline firm. Bumps and road imperfections are felt, and sometimes heard, but the suspension and tires (low-profile 45-series) won't shake your fillings out or pound your kidneys like, say, a Mitsubishi Evo's. (Still, given the choice, I like true luxury-car-soft suspensions, which are more and more difficult to find these days). Noise level is helped by the underhood insulation pad, good weatherstrip-sealing, high-quality glass on the windows, and the tight, Swiss-Watch assembly of the car. Even the road/tire noise that is often present in many other Honda/Acura products is somewhat lacking in the Type-S...surprising with its performance-oriented all-season tires.

Brakes, while a Brembo upgrade on the Type S with larger 12.2" front rotors, could, IMO, nevertheless still use some improvement. For a sport sedan, there is too much free play in the brake pedal travel. An inch or so of play is followed by a little sponginess, and then they finally start to bite. This was a brand-new car, of course, and how the pads/rotors will feel after 1000 break-in miles, I can't say, but I've driven some of the Type-S competitors, notably from BMW and Audi, and their brake pedals had a rock-firm feel from Day One. In addition, of course, the TL's FWD setup is not an ideal one for brake distribution and getting all four wheels to do their share of the braking loads, even with electronic braking aids...there will always be a certain amount of nose-heaviness. Fortunately, the brake-pedal placement (aluminum sport-pedals in the Type-S) is fine for my big size-15 feet...there are no problems with my long, wide, clown-shoe getting caught under either the brake or gas pedals while shifting my right foot back and forth for braking.



THE VERDICT:

I have to admit, with the latest 2008 TL, and particularly the Type-S, I've changed my mind somewhat over my opinion of earlier versions. Acura has made a number of quality and design improvements to the TL-series since I last drove one a few years ago (a test-drive/review I was less-than-impressed with), and they have seemed to have done this without a total redesign. At the same time, as I stated in the opening section, the new little-brother Acura TSX, which I formerly had a higher opinion of than the TL, has been so much of a disappointment in its new 2009 version that the new TL handily dusts it off in many areas, and is now, IMO, a better buy than the new TSX. But a new, first-time, AWD system is coming soon for little-brother TSX; Acura, IMO, would be wise to fit its superb SH-AWD system to the TL, something it has not done yet, though the same basic system can be found in the MDX, RDX, and RL, so conversion/engineering costs for the TL AWD would be minimal.

And, as it stands, even though I am far more impressed with the new TL than with earlier versions, there are still a few flies in the ointment that need a fly-swatter. The engine torque curve is simply too peaky and is not conducive to true sports-sedan driving. The power-assist for the brake pedal, even with the superb Brembo rotors, pads, and calipers, needs to be redesigned to take out the free play and sponginess. And a few interior features like the over-buttoned steering wheel and complex (for a Honda) NAV-stereo system could use a minor redesign. But, overall, a major, and pleasant, improvement over previous TL's........well done, Acura. :)

UberNoob
07-05-08, 07:25 PM
another great review!

was the Type-S worth the price premium over the base TL?

mmarshall
07-05-08, 07:46 PM
another great review!
Thanks. :)

was the Type-S worth the price premium over the base TL?

For my money, yes.

The base car, IMO, does have better-looking stock wheels and better-looking lower-body panels without the awkward, slab-like flares, but not much else. Its double-wishbone/multi-link suspension and tire sizes are exactly the same as the Type-S (so it won't ride any smoother). It has less engine, less-powerful brakes, and it lacks the manual-transmission option of the Type-S. And the Type-S exterior package, as I noted in the review, is tasteful, subdued, and doesn't scream boy-racer to the world. While I would normally prefer the wood of the base model, the Type S has superb dual-tone carbon-fiber trim. So, in my view, it's a no-brainer........Type S all the way. ;)

CK6Speed
07-05-08, 08:39 PM
This is my favorite picture. I love the exhausts tips on the TL-S. Very muscular, traditional, and non funky looking.:thumbup:

http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/81147/2007-Acura-TL-Type-S-i003.jpg

GSteg
07-05-08, 09:05 PM
One of Acura's best cars ever. Hopefully the next one wont be too disappointing!

mmarshall
07-05-08, 09:16 PM
This is my favorite picture. I love the exhausts tips on the TL-S. Very muscular, traditional, and non funky looking.:thumbup:

http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/81147/2007-Acura-TL-Type-S-i003.jpg

The exhaust system is not quite what it seems, however. The quad tips sticking out the back are real...they come out of two rear mufflers in back. But the central exhaust pipe, in a bow to cost-cutting with expensive catalysts, runs in a single tube from the exhaust manifolds back through a single catalytic converter and heat shield to the rear, where it then splits into the dual rear mufflers and quad tips.

mmarshall
07-05-08, 10:05 PM
One of Acura's best cars ever.

Arguably, yes, though I was a big fan of the third-generation Integra.
I thought it a far nicer and more solidly-built car than the RSX that replaced it.

http://www.analogstereo.com/images/om/acura_integra.jpg


Hopefully the next one wont be too disappointing!

The chief problem for the stylists will be to avoid that ridiculous inverted V-Grin grille on other new Acuras. I'd bet the monthly rent they don't.......and the next-generation 2009 TL, like the 2009 TSX, ends up with it. :thumbdn: Here's one of the possible spy shots:

http://blogs.cars.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/02/06/2009acurarl.jpg

tuan92129
07-05-08, 10:22 PM
Arguably, yes, though I was a big fan of the third-generation Integra.
I thought it a far nicer and more solidly-built car than the RSX that replaced it.

http://www.analogstereo.com/images/om/acura_integra.jpg




The chief problem for the stylists will be to avoid that ridiculous inverted V-Grin grille on other new Acuras. I'd bet the monthly rent they don't.......and the next-generation 2009 TL, like the 2009 TSX, ends up with it. :thumbdn: Here's one of the possible spy shots:

http://blogs.cars.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/02/06/2009acurarl.jpg

But thats a pic of the refreshened RL though :uh:

Allen K
07-05-08, 10:23 PM
Another great review mmarshall, hope the arm is feeling better. I was so close to getting this car over the IS, but I didn't in the end because I wanted something other than a FWD Honda/Acura product ( I was coming from a 2000 Accord v6).

I test drove the automatic TL-S (what you said is true, manuals are hard to find) and I redlined that thing after seeing the salesperson do it first ;). The car, even the automatic, pulls just as hard as my 350 and it was fun to push.

However, one of the most negative things with the automatic was that it just didn't want to coast to a stop. Every time I hit a red light on the test drive, I got off the gas and was rewarded with a jerky downshift. But overall fit and finish was fantastic with that thing :)

P.S. did you see any of the Kinetic Blue Pearls on the lot? It's a dark blue/purple combo, and the best color IMO other than black on that car.

mmarshall
07-05-08, 10:31 PM
But thats a pic of the refreshened RL though :uh:

Yes, I posted it mainly to show the new Acura "family" grille design, not necessarily as the next TL per se.....though the google image site did mention it as a possible next TL guess of what it more or less would look like..

GFerg
07-05-08, 10:33 PM
Nice review. I drove one in the same color combo you did last month. :thumbup: They make a nice white. Anyway, surprised you saw a difference on the interior. Everything looked and felt the same to me since they first came out back in 2004. I personally couldnt find a big difference in anything that would make me want to purchase this over the regular TL. Same features, bigger engine that feels no faster than a 04-06 TL 6-speed. Plus the TL-S cost about 40K. Just couldnt see the value in it. And yes, the manual is super slick. I love it!! No one does it better than Honda IMO.

With that said its still one of my favorite Acuras to date. Just wish the improvements that they made were more significant.

mmarshall
07-05-08, 10:39 PM
Another great review mmarshall, hope the arm is feeling better.

Thanks. :) It is. Time (and a rest) was mostly what it needed.



I test drove the automatic TL-S (what you said is true, manuals are hard to find) and I redlined that thing after seeing the salesperson do it first ;). The car, even the automatic, pulls just as hard as my 350 and it was fun to push.

I hope it had at least 1000 miles on it and was broken-in when you guys decided to play Michael Shumacher. :eek2:

However, one of the most negative things with the automatic was that it just didn't want to coast to a stop.

More or less typical with fluid-filled, torque-converter automatics. They usually have less engine-braking than clutch-pedal manuals.

P.S. did you see any of the Kinetic Blue Pearls on the lot? It's a dark blue/purple combo, and the best color IMO other than black on that car.

Yes, I did, but the review requests were specifically for a 6MT.....the blue ones were automatic. There was only one Type-S manual on the lot..........a White Pearl one.

Allen K
07-05-08, 10:49 PM
I hope it had at least 1000 miles on it and was broken-in when you guys decided to play Michael Shumacher. :eek2:

I honestly planned on taking it easy on the car, but the sales guy pulled it out of the lot (afraid of scraping), turned the corner then gunned it :eek2: I took that as a sign that it was okay to return the favor :D

mmarshall
07-06-08, 04:38 AM
I honestly planned on taking it easy on the car, but the sales guy pulled it out of the lot (afraid of scraping), turned the corner then gunned it :eek2: I took that as a sign that it was okay to return the favor :D

Maybe it was okay....depending on the car's mileage. Usually, with 1000 miles or less, one should take it easy.


Some salespeople are so intent on making a sale that they don't care what they do to impress a customer and make that sale.....even abuse the vehicle to show it off. Fortunately, they are becoming fewer and farther between.

ffpower
07-06-08, 09:52 AM
mmarshall, next time you are in the TL, hold the front door handle and try to twist it with a little bit of force and let me what you think. I was a HUGE fan of TL's interior before I did that experiment... Still a fan of the interior styling though but no long of the quality.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 10:43 AM
mmarshall, next time you are in the TL, hold the front door handle and try to twist it with a little bit of force and let me what you think. I was a HUGE fan of TL's interior before I did that experiment... Still a fan of the interior styling though but no long of the quality.

I know what you are referring to. No car today has the same solid metal hardware that big, tanklike American cars did 50 years ago..........but, by today's standards, and those of the inherently lighter and less durable trim materials in widespread use today, those in the TL are quite good.

You must remember that cars today are designed and built with lighter materials and weight control in mind, for fuel economy and acceleration......that was not the case decades ago. It's not necessarily the way I like my cars, but it is the reality of today's political and economic auto world.

Threxx
07-06-08, 11:31 AM
Good review. You and I seem to agree on the handling and suspension/chassis dynamics as well as the powertrain characteristics. It's not a race car, even in Type-S / 6MT flavor, which is just not that much different than the regular/auto variant. Slightly improvement but nothing miraculous.

I really like the TL overall and even recommended one (an 05 auto) to my friend but he has had way more problems with it than any other car he has owned - in fact the transmission is being replaced right now, which supposedly isn't really an issue anymore. I think he just got unlucky though.

By the way I might have missed it in your review but one thing that helps in the TL is the noise inversion feature it uses... I've always wanted to try pulling the fuse on the stereo or inversion system to see what difference I can actually tell with and without it.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 11:46 AM
Good review.

Thanks. :)

You and I seem to agree on the handling and suspension/chassis dynamics as well as the powertrain characteristics. It's not a race car, even in Type-S / 6MT flavor, which is just not that much different than the regular/auto variant. Slightly improvement but nothing miraculous.

If Acura, however, could just remap the engine's torque curve and power-brake-assist characteristics a little, it would be a lot more of a sports sedan, despite the FWD layout, than it is now. Those are the only two things it is lacking for good sports-sedan material.....it has just about everything else, including one of the best FWD manual transmissions on the planet.

I really like the TL overall and even recommended one (an 05 auto) to my friend but he has had way more problems with it than any other car he has owned - in fact the transmission is being replaced right now, which supposedly isn't really an issue anymore. I think he just got unlucky though.
Sorry your friend got a lemon. :( Most of the transmission issues, however, were cleared up after 2003. Newer TL's, in general, are well above average in reliability.

By the way I might have missed it in your review but one thing that helps in the TL is the noise inversion feature it uses... I've always wanted to try pulling the fuse on the stereo or inversion system to see what difference I can actually tell with and without it.

No, you didn't miss it. I didn't go into that feature in the review........but I did note the car's generaly good stereo sound quality, the riding quietness, and the absense of the usual Honda-designed vehicles' road noise. Perhaps that noise inversion feature, in addition to the other noise-absorbing features I DID mention in the review, did the trick. ;)

1SICKLEX
07-06-08, 01:18 PM
Good review Mike! I'm tempted to test it out as well. When I recently drove/rode in a base TL I found rear headroom to be fine and I'm 6 foot 5. I recently was in the backseat of a CL-S and my head was in the rear window.

I agree the paint is superb.

However for 38k nearing 40k, like the G35, I have to pass. The lower the price the more attractive they are and the higher the price, the more inclined I am to recommend a 3 or IS etc.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 02:56 PM
Good review Mike!

Thanks. :)

I'm tempted to test it out as well. When I recently drove/rode in a base TL I found rear headroom to be fine and I'm 6 foot 5. I recently was in the backseat of a CL-S and my head was in the rear window.


Did the base TL you were in have a sunroof? Sunroof housings, with a rare exeption here and there, are notorious for robbing headroom. I'm 6" 2" bare-headed, but, with my ever-present cap, am probably about the same height as you....and there's no doubt I'm heavier and wider.

I agree the paint is superb. Yes, one of the best mass-produced paint jobs out there short of a Lexus, which is generally considered the industry's best. (some Audis also come close).


However for 38k nearing 40k, like the G35, I have to pass. The lower the price the more attractive they are and the higher the price, the more inclined I am to recommend a 3 or IS etc.


I know 38-40K sounds like a lot, but it really isn't that much at today's auto prices. The average price of a new car, for the last several years, has been from 26-30K, although that may now be changing as people change their buying habits and new vehicle choices with the high gas prices.

There are a number of CL members here who routinely purchase brand-new high-line Lexus, BMW, Mercedes, etc... models for CASH, without even a need to finance them..

Threxx
07-06-08, 03:14 PM
Did the base TL you were in have a sunroof?

I'm pretty sure that it's not possible to get a current-gen TL without a sun roof. It's a standard feature on all of them.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 03:24 PM
I'm pretty sure that it's not possible to get a current-gen TL without a sun roof. It's a standard feature on all of them.
Yes, from the literature, it appears to be standard for 2008 for both base and Type-S, but it is unclear if he meant a 2008 or earlier model.....I don't know if it was standard before this year.

Threxx
07-06-08, 03:31 PM
Yes, from the literature, it appears to be standard for 2008 for both base and Type-S, but it is unclear if he meant a 2008 or earlier model.....I don't know if it was standard before this year.

2004+ it was standard. Not sure about before that but I wouldn't be surprised if it was standard on the 99-03 gen as well.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 03:40 PM
2004+ it was standard.

OK....I'll take your word for it. No reason to doubt.

Not sure about before that but I wouldn't be surprised if it was standard on the 99-03 gen as well.

Maybe? :uh:

The Lexus IS300 of that vintage, I know, did not have one standard. I managed to find a yellow 2001, brand-new (which I bought) without a sunroof and some other things I didn't want. I don't think the ES300 had a standard sunroof either, back then.

Threxx
07-06-08, 03:45 PM
Looks like it was standard at least 99+ according to this
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/1999/acura/tl/specifications/index.html

Acura has a habit of pretty much selling their cars in one two three possible configurations. Unlike Lexus which typically has a dizzying options list for its cars.

tuan92129
07-06-08, 03:55 PM
Looks like it was standard at least 99+ according to this
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/1999/acura/tl/specifications/index.html

Acura has a habit of pretty much selling their cars in one two three possible configurations. Unlike Lexus which typically has a dizzying options list for its cars.

Now, compare that to German Automaker's list of options :eek2:

LexGuy2
07-06-08, 04:11 PM
Excellent, unbiased review!

As a previous Acura owner, I would take the TL-S over the IS350 anytime, the IS is for midgets with all due respect. And as far as I know, nobody pays MSRP ($38K) for a TL-S, around $34K-35K is about right, I was told they are having fire sales now (around $32K) since the new 2009 TL is coming out this fall.

mmarshall
07-06-08, 04:25 PM
Now, compare that to German Automaker's list of options :eek2:

Never mind the list itself. Just take a look at what BMW, for instance, charges FOR those options. :D

http://www.showmemore123.com/images/money-pile.jpg

mmarshall
07-06-08, 04:42 PM
Excellent, unbiased review!

Thanks.:)

As a previous Acura owner, I would take the TL-S over the IS350 anytime, the IS is for midgets with all due respect. And as far as I know, nobody pays MSRP ($38K) for a TL-S, around $34K-35K is about right, I was told they are having fire sales now (around $32K) since the new 2009 TL is coming out this fall.

The IS250/350 is OK up front, but, in the rear, you are correct that it is a classic sardine can for large, and even normal-sized, adults. The TL's legroom, in contrast, is limo-like....but, at 6' 2", I found the TL's rear head room inadequate, and the front headroom, with the sunroof housing, adequate only if you set the seat at its lowest height.

Discounts, in this age of an-arm-and-a-leg gas prices, are not surprising on sport sedans like the TL. The engine's somewhat weak torque curve at lower RPM means that a lot of owners will be giving it some revs once it's broken in.....which, of course, uses gas. You're obviously not going to get the mileage of a Civic Hybrid or Insight. That, of course, means that dealerships may have to drop some $$$$$ off the sticker price to provide a sales incentive and move these cars out the door. Manual-transmission models, however, may not need the discount....they are hard enough to find as it is.
(I jumped at the chance to review a manual Type-S yesterday, by CL request, because I didn't know when the next unsold one would be available).

UDel
07-06-08, 04:55 PM
2004+ it was standard. Not sure about before that but I wouldn't be surprised if it was standard on the 99-03 gen as well.

Sunroofs were standard on all 99-03 TL and CL as well as later models.

UDel
07-06-08, 05:39 PM
Very nice review mmarshal, I was looking forward to your review as a TL type S is something I will highly consider for my next car and I really like it. Overall I seemed to get the same impressions as you. I can see where someone might not be a fan of the rims because they are kind of aggressive looking and different but I like them especially on a black TL S I saw a few weeks ago. Your right about the excellent paint job, after getting a PC7424 and polishing a few cars and compairing paint quality and waxes that is one area I focus more on now and the black TL S had a smooth mirror like paint job with no orange peel that I could see and I was highly impressed. I was not able to drive the TL S but I am sure and have read it has a typical Acura powerplant (aside from the RDX) that you have to rev higher to get the most performance out of it and you most likely did not explore the higher rpm range on your test drive. Some people like higher revving performance cars, some like more torque down low, personally I don't care as I like both characteristics and feel they have their place in certain cars(who would want an S2000 not to have a screaming engine with a super high redline or an M3 not to have a high revving engine?) I was highly impressed by the interior of the newer TLs especially a type S I sat in a few months ago that had cream and black leather seats that looked really nice. Everything felt high quality and very well put together.

The next TL is pretty much confirmed to have a SHAWD version with around 310hp. The base model will have around 280hp and both models will be bigger then the current one.

The one question I have with the review is how disappointed you were with the TSX especially the interior quality which you brought up comparing it to the TL S and last TSX. I went to go check out the TSX a few weeks ago and specifically wanted to compare it to the last one and went in with fairly low expectations for the interior mainly from your review. The new TSX certainly looks and is bigger and wider then the last one and I thought it looked more upscale then the last one but not as sporty or crisp. When I sat in the interior I was surprised because it seemed very nice and nicer then I remembered the last TSX being. It certainly felt more luxurious but not as sporty or driver oriented as the last TSX. I was feeling different surfaces and pressing buttons and feeling the leather and everything felt high quality, a bit nicer then the last TSX. The one thing I did not like was the location of the NAV screen which is now farther away from the driver and not as easy to quickly access and glance at. I know the light wood trim looks nice in the older TSX and I wish the newer one had some wood trim but I did not miss it too much. The painted silver trim did not bother me much and I did not really notice it even though I highly dislike the trend of many manufactures using painted silver trim in their interiors these days. I then sat in the older TSX which was used for sale but unfortunately it did not have the wood trim and it was a black interior so I was not all that impressed and felt the newer TSX was nicer but not as driver oriented or sporty. There was one with a tan interior and wood trim that looked much nicer from looking in the window but I did not have time to ask for the key to that one.

Overall I still thought the newer TSX had a very nice high quality interior and could not really find any cheap or disappointing bits and am surprised you are so disappointed in it and thought the previous TSX interior was so much nicer. I have not read any real criticisms of interior quality in the reviews and their main criticism with the new TSX is the electric steering system and it not being as fun or communicative as the previous TSX steering system, the switch I have read was done to improve gas mileage. After working on some cars with failed/broken hood struts that will be expensive to replace I don't really care if it has a pop rod and kind of prefer pop rods now, I don't think what holds a hood up to be a big deal or all that luxurious but it may be a bigger deal to others.

Overall I enjoyed your review and it was one of the ones I was highly looking forward to.

mmarshall
07-07-08, 06:29 AM
Very nice review mmarshal,
Thanks. :)

I was looking forward to your review as a TL type S is something I will highly consider for my next car and I really like it.

Yes...you were not alone in waiting, and, for several reasons, I wish I could have gotten to it sooner.

Overall I seemed to get the same impressions as you. I can see where someone might not be a fan of the rims because they are kind of aggressive looking and different but I like them especially on a black TL S I saw a few weeks ago.


I didn't base my view of the rims on an aggressive or non-aggressive factor; I just thought they were unattractive, period.....especially with the White Pearl paint on my test car. The standard rims on the base TL, for instance, were exactly the same size as the Type-S, and, IMO, much better-looking....had it been my car, I likely would have asked the dealership for a swap.



Your right about the excellent paint job, after getting a PC7424 and polishing a few cars and compairing paint quality and waxes that is one area I focus more on now and the black TL S had a smooth mirror like paint job with no orange peel that I could see and I was highly impressed.

I just wish that Ford and Chrysler would paint their vehicles like this. Some of the new GM paint jobs, such as the Cadillac CTS, are more impressive than before, but Ford and Chrysler, IMO, are still lagging.



I was not able to drive the TL S but I am sure and have read it has a typical Acura powerplant (aside from the RDX) that you have to rev higher to get the most performance out of it and you most likely did not explore the higher rpm range on your test drive. Some people like higher revving performance cars, some like more torque down low, personally I don't care as I like both characteristics and feel they have their place in certain cars(who would want an S2000 not to have a screaming engine with a super high redline or an M3 not to have a high revving engine?) I was highly impressed by the interior of the newer TLs especially a type S I sat in a few months ago that had cream and black leather seats that looked really nice. Everything felt high quality and very well put together.

While it is true that Europeans tend to like high-revving engines, and I know that CL has readers from all over the world, I was looking at it more from an American point of view, since I was reviewing the car in its American-spec trim and primarily for use on American roads by American drivers. We Yankees, to an extent, tend to prefer higher torque at lower RPMs.....perhaps dating from the 1960s when that was the norm in American muscle-cars.

The next TL is pretty much confirmed to have a SHAWD version with around 310hp. The base model will have around 280hp and both models will be bigger then the current one.

Good. :) AWD, despite high gas prices and its tendency to use more gas and eat up more HP than FWD or RWD, is definitely going to be one of the things expected on new upscale cars, at least as an option.

The one question I have with the review is how disappointed you were with the TSX especially the interior quality which you brought up comparing it to the TL S and last TSX. I went to go check out the TSX a few weeks ago and specifically wanted to compare it to the last one and went in with fairly low expectations for the interior mainly from your review. The new TSX certainly looks and is bigger and wider then the last one and I thought it looked more upscale then the last one but not as sporty or crisp. When I sat in the interior I was surprised because it seemed very nice and nicer then I remembered the last TSX being. It certainly felt more luxurious but not as sporty or driver oriented as the last TSX. I was feeling different surfaces and pressing buttons and feeling the leather and everything felt high quality, a bit nicer then the last TSX. The one thing I did not like was the location of the NAV screen which is now farther away from the driver and not as easy to quickly access and glance at. I know the light wood trim looks nice in the older TSX and I wish the newer one had some wood trim but I did not miss it too much. The painted silver trim did not bother me much and I did not really notice it even though I highly dislike the trend of many manufactures using painted silver trim in their interiors these days. I then sat in the older TSX which was used for sale but unfortunately it did not have the wood trim and it was a black interior so I was not all that impressed and felt the newer TSX was nicer but not as driver oriented or sporty. There was one with a tan interior and wood trim that looked much nicer from looking in the window but I did not have time to ask for the key to that one.

Overall I still thought the newer TSX had a very nice high quality interior and could not really find any cheap or disappointing bits and am surprised you are so disappointed in it and thought the previous TSX interior was so much nicer. I have not read any real criticisms of interior quality in the reviews and their main criticism with the new TSX is the electric steering system and it not being as fun or communicative as the previous TSX steering system, the switch I have read was done to improve gas mileage. After working on some cars with failed/broken hood struts that will be expensive to replace I don't really care if it has a pop rod and kind of prefer pop rods now, I don't think what holds a hood up to be a big deal or all that luxurious but it may be a bigger deal to others.

Overall I enjoyed your review and it was one of the ones I was highly looking forward to.

Thanks again.:)

I highly respect your view of the new TSX interior (you are not the type of person who forms biased opinions) :) , but the reason I found it a disappointment is not so much that the new interior is that poor (although I definitely did not like the painted gray/silver plastic), but that the old interior, particularly the beige/wood trim, was so NICE. The material quality, richness of appearance, trim, color integration, patterns, etc...., to my tastes, were much better done in the old one than in the new one. However, there is no doubt that the new interior is larger and roomier than the old one, and simply needs more materials inside to equip it............perhaps one of the reasons for the apparant cost-cutting in the interior materials of the new one.

mmarshall
07-07-08, 07:19 AM
Nice review. I drove one in the same color combo you did last month. :thumbup: They make a nice white. Anyway, surprised you saw a difference on the interior. Everything looked and felt the same to me since they first came out back in 2004. I personally couldnt find a big difference in anything that would make me want to purchase this over the regular TL. Same features, bigger engine that feels no faster than a 04-06 TL 6-speed. Plus the TL-S cost about 40K. Just couldnt see the value in it. And yes, the manual is super slick. I love it!! No one does it better than Honda IMO.

With that said its still one of my favorite Acuras to date. Just wish the improvements that they made were more significant.

Thanks.....and sorry, GFerg............I inadvertantly forgot to respond to your post. I wasn't trying to be rude. :)

I agree the TL interior and layout doesn't necessarily LOOK much different than 4 or 5 years ago, but the 2008 Type-S model I drove seemed much tighter, more rattle/squeak-free, and more carefully built than earlier ones. In addition, the interior materials, while looking much the same, felt of higher quality. The last TL I drove, for example, simply did not impress me as much as this one did.........and that is independent of the Type-S features on this one, and not taking even that into account.

1SICKLEX
07-07-08, 12:06 PM
Mike, it did have a sunroof. I was with 2 ladies in the back and I didn't feel too cramped, I felt it was adequate.

The IS clearly is a much smaller car, 9 inches shorter. The ES/TL/G35/CTS are all in their own kind of niche, priced like the A4/IS/3/C but sized like the next class up. Do not try to fit 3 people in the backseat of the IS or you will want to punch the driver.

mmarshall
07-07-08, 02:09 PM
Mike, it did have a sunroof. I was with 2 ladies in the back and I didn't feel too cramped, I felt it was adequate.

The IS clearly is a much smaller car, 9 inches shorter. The ES/TL/G35/CTS are all in their own kind of niche, priced like the A4/IS/3/C but sized like the next class up. Do not try to fit 3 people in the backseat of the IS or you will want to punch the driver.


Yes, I know that the IS back seat is cramped. I had a 2001 for almost 5 years....and the new ones are even more cramped in back. One of the reasons I bought one is that I rarely have people in back, but, nevertheless, still like to have the rear doors...I put stuff in the back seat.

Threxx
07-10-08, 06:46 AM
One thing I've got to give to my friend's 05 TL's credit is its ridiculous resale value. Today he's putting his nearly 4 year old 47k mile car with some dings and scratches and stains up for sale for $19,900 on auto trader. I thought he was asking too much at first but after looking around it seems to be a reasonable asking price as long as he's a bit flexible in negotiations.

BTW... anybody notice a certain member missing entirely from this thread? The one guy that was most persistent in asking mmarshall to review a 6MT Type-S over any other TL because that's the one and only model that would give race car like handling and would take out a 335i on the track?:D

leedogg
07-10-08, 06:55 AM
Thanks.....and sorry, GFerg............I inadvertantly forgot to respond to your post. I wasn't trying to be rude. :)

I agree the TL interior and layout doesn't necessarily LOOK much different than 4 or 5 years ago, but the 2008 Type-S model I drove seemed much tighter, more rattle/squeak-free, and more carefully built than earlier ones. In addition, the interior materials, while looking much the same, felt of higher quality. The last TL I drove, for example, simply did not impress me as much as this one did.........and that is independent of the Type-S features on this one, and not taking even that into account.

You're not tripping mmarshall. They've done numerous things to improve interior quality that arent easily noticeable unless you know about them. Better quality leather, additional stitching in the seats so there are no longer butt prints. All the fixes for the rattles that plagued earlier models. Noise cancellation making the interior quieter. Upgraded suspension and rear sway bar for a tighter ride.

The TL-S is the peak, mature model of the 3rd generation. The 4th generation has big shoes to fill.

Threxx
07-10-08, 04:14 PM
You're not tripping mmarshall. They've done numerous things to improve interior quality that arent easily noticeable unless you know about them. Better quality leather, additional stitching in the seats so there are no longer butt prints. All the fixes for the rattles that plagued earlier models. Noise cancellation making the interior quieter. Upgraded suspension and rear sway bar for a tighter ride.

The TL-S is the peak, mature model of the 3rd generation. The 4th generation has big shoes to fill.

I get the feeling that the 4th gen will not live up to the 3rd gen in terms of materials as that seems to be the direction Acura took to an extent with the TSX. The new TL doesn't really appeal to me mostly just because it's bigger than I really care for in a semi-sporty sedan... much like the Maxima, or at least like the previous version of the Maxima... not sure about the new one.

My friend's 05 has a LOT of rattles though... when did they really get the rattles under control or was it a progressive thing like a few fixes each year? It'll be interesting to see if they STAY rattle-free as they get higher up in the miles.

I personally have never been in an Acura with 50k miles or more than didn't have a lot of extra noises coming from various areas. I mean nothing terrible... nothing more than most other cars, but they've never really stood out to me as particularly well-built or any better assembled than the Accord.