91 Maxima or 1994 LS400 or GS300
I have a high mileage 91 Maxima with about 270K miles. I'm thinking
of buying another used car, and considering a Lexus that costs less
than $15,000.00. I have considered newer maxima models too, and could
fine some 2000s around that price.
The main reason I'm moving from my current maxima is the mounting cost
of repairs on a 12 year old car - i had so far sunk about $2000 into
this car this year alone, replacing a number of broken parts.
If I buy a 1994 Lexus, what kinds of expensive repairs should I
anticipate?
Would it be better to get a newer maxima or a GS300 or even a 1994 LS400?
Thanks in advance for your assistance ..
/N
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...threadid=96035
Last edited by bluelex; Oct 15, 2003 at 07:37 AM.
1.dgot20's car
2.1997 ls400 for around that
3.1998-99 gs300
4.1993 gs300 & 1991-94 ls400 together
ps. nothing would go wrong with a lexus if properly taken care of. and if you fine one here, its more than likely been treated well.
Last edited by fireballs gs400; Oct 15, 2003 at 09:26 AM.
Going from the Maxima to the Acura was a step up--you could tell in the materials that they used (and obvious price differences). One thing that I will give my previous Nissans was that their engines and transmissions were almost bulletproof--they would start reliably and never gave me any problems. However, once I stepped up to an Acura, the nice interiors speak for themselves. Now going from Acura (a value-oriented luxury brand, in my opinion a really nice Honda Accord, which it basically is), to the Lexus GS400, the perceived quality of the materials goes yet up another notch--the leather is very high quality (probably the highest quality I've had in any of the previously mentioned cars), the switchgear all have a reassuring feel of quality to them, BUT it all comes at a higher cost. To service the Nissans or Acura, the parts pretty much were shared with the normal Nissan/Honda channels, and it was pretty cheap to keep them serviced w/ general parts. With the Lexus, just perusing around some of the parts websites (www.parts.com, www.spartanmotormall.com, among many others), if anything goes wrong w/ the Lexus, it will be marginally more expensive to maintain (parts are anywhere from 20-300% more, depending on what you're getting and where you are getting it serviced). However, if the car really doesn't break (esp. w/ the high quality parts they use), then the money is worth it. I consider paying a little more for quality materials for something that I know will last me for a good duration, a very worthwhile investment. All-in-all, you do get what you pay for (in the arena of replacement parts and materials, at least).
One caveat to the Lexus is that while their service departments are pretty good, but they sure make you pay for it (among the most expensive out there), so keep that in mind if you don't do the work yourself or already have an independent garage to do the work for you. With my Acura, I could take it to either a Honda dealer or an Acura dealer and there was not any issues (warranties, etc.) with that. With my Lexus, the Toyota dealerships won't even look at it for service, not to mention the fact that they can't get you any Lexus parts nor even get a parts cross-reference (unless they have special dealings w/ L-tuned parts), so it pretty much relegates you to the Lexus dealer or an independent shop for service--soemthing to think about.
I've been very happy with my current GS400, and I'll be keeping this vehicle for a while. In the end, for you, I don't really think that you can go wrong with your preferred vehicle choices, so long as you pick a vehicle that's been taken care of and has not been in any accidents. With the Nissans, you can't go wrong, but step up to a Lexus, and you'll be riding in a higher notch of luxury (albeit at somewhat higher maintenance costs) and unlike many domestics, it will probably last you until 275K as well, if not longer.
Best of luck to your search.
I also have a 1999 GS 400 that has been kind of good to me but certain things have been slight disappointments considering this was a $53K car a few years ago. There is a horrible low idle issue with most 98-00 GS 400 models, dont really know about GS 300 or LS 400. Also, the car DOES not hold the road as well as a 5 Series BMW and the auto tranny IS NOT nearly as crisp as a G35 Sedan, the handling leaves something to be desired and is nowhere near the two either. However you can not mess with the car in terms of exterior styling and interior fit and finish. Perfect.
In your shoes, I would opt for either a 1997 LS400 with avg miles (Which is the last year before the slight re-design) or a 1998 GS 300 with around 85K-90K miles. In both cases, you have to watch out for the timing belt change anywhere from 60-90K even though most people never change them. Otherwise if it has been maintained before you, you should have no problems. You probably wont enjoy a 2001 Maxima as much as one of these, even though in the long run I guarantee you would have less headaches.
PS, I wouldnt really opt for a Pre 98 GS 300. Even though they have 220HP, your 91 Maxima and it would be head to head 0-60. Both around the 9 second mark.
Last edited by NYC Max; Oct 15, 2003 at 10:24 AM.
15k would get u into 2nd gen gs with 95-110 sumodd thousand miles.
Take a look at mine, and send me a PM if u want to talk, otherwise goodluck on ur purchase and whatever u do, choose a LEXUS!!!!
Trending Topics
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
it was great...smooth, that adjustable suspension was great. that digital display was tight. i don't know bro.... that was a pretty high tech car for the day.
wish i could find another JUST LIKE THAT. i would buy it in a sec.
Last edited by j2tha0e; Oct 17, 2003 at 10:43 AM.








