Just kind of funny, take it with a grain of salt.

Conservatives VS. Libertarians VS. Liberals
http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-rlc/907467/posts

Conservatives VS. Libertarians VS. Liberals
May 7, 2003 | self
Posted on 05/07/2003 4:17 PM PDT by HighWheeler


Conservatives: Want Freedom with Responsibilities.
Libertarians: Want Freedom without any Responsibilities.
Liberals: Want No Freedom with No Responsibilities. (Hillary's little people liberals don't realize this is where their leaders would take them)


Conservatives:
- Drive the speed limit, or something close to it, knowing the penalty for getting caught driving over the speed limit.
- Keep their house and property in good shape and up to the community standards.
- Like the Constitution and all it stands for.
- Dont' tolerate criminals, and want them all punished to the extent of the crime.

Libertarians:
- Drive whatever speed they want while smoking pot, if they hit someone, well too bad, they should have known there are no speed limits, and maybe now they learned something. EFF the world anyhow.
- Keep the house and property in good shape for growing pot, and protecting it from the neighbors who want to steal it. EFF the world anyhow.
- Only like the parts of the Constitution that don't say that pot is illegal. That old Constitution parchment also makes a great rolling paper. EFF the world anyhow.
- There are no criminals, nothing is illegal.

Liberals:
- Drive bicycles like in China.
- Keep their house and property, uh wait, the government furnished commune and surrounding federal land, in whatever condition they find it each day. Where's the super been the last couple months anyhow?
- Hate the Constitution except for the part about free speech...well before the government took that away after the Liberal Supreme Kort ruled that every word ever spoken offended at least someone, and therefore all speech was determined to be hate speech.
- All criminals are promoted to positions of liberal leadership.


*Let's not turn this into a big "my politics are better than your politics" fiasco. I thought it was funny, and some of you would like it. I realize there are generalizations being made that aren't completely true.*

What do you expect people to say to this? It is a laughably pathetic distortion of an alternate universe probably envisioned by a self-important conservative myrmidon, distributed for consumption by equally narrow-minded myrmidons. If I had the motivation to realign these warped comparisons with reality, I'd have to start from the very beginning up to the very end. But the question remains: why would I want to waste my time drawing up pointless, devicive jokes that flatter my own ego? Kind of like masturbation if you ask me.... :rolleyes:

Truth always hurts. :D

Originally posted by bitkahuna
Truth always hurts. :D

Sorry if I hurt you or SDuquette ;)

This debate sucks. ;)



http://www.clublexus.com/gallery/data/500/13879rofl.gif



Seriously though, i'm not sure if the op is to create a debate, or just to inform.

Originally posted by O. L. T.
Seriously though, i'm not sure if the op is to create a debate, or just to inform.

Not so much 'inform' as incite or inflame. The same way that saying 'right-wing conservatives just want to oppress women, gays, Blacks, Mexicans, non-Christians, and give the rich hand jobs all day' would incite anger on the converse perspective. That's the way I see it ay least.

Sweeping generalizations and stereotypes are for fools to believe and discuss. I've grown wise enough to make certain distinctions between 'ring of truth' and 'outright ludicrous'. I come across this kind of crap all the time, I just have enough judgment to determine what is post-worthy and what is not. This kind of stuff really belongs on joke sites and mass-mail spams. I would have thought CL members passed the adolescent phase of stereotyping everything. :rolleyes: