Build Threads Details on Club Lexus SC owner vehicles

My indecisive 98 SC300 build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-22 | 07:11 AM
  #661  
t2d2's Avatar
t2d2
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,691
Likes: 237
From: Location: Location!
Default

Sad day... Presumably, not for you, though!
Old 01-02-22 | 07:18 AM
  #662  
ThomasGS4's Avatar
ThomasGS4
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,504
Likes: 387
From: TX
Default

Great choice, you'll love the GS!
Old 01-02-22 | 08:47 AM
  #663  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Kira X
Those GS’ are awesome and pretty comfortable. Does the SC being retired mean you’re still keeping it?
I'm still keeping it, but I haven't driven it since before thanksgiving.

I don't think anyone is crazy enough to pay what I would want for my SC. The SC has more $$ into it than the GS cost.

Originally Posted by t2d2
Sad day... Presumably, not for you, though!
It's hardly a sad day. The SC has been "complete" for a while now. It's time for a new project.

Originally Posted by ThomasGS4
Great choice, you'll love the GS!
Thank you! I always thought my next Lexus would be a the RC-F, but I didn't care for it after driving the car. It felt like too much of boat for the amount of money. The GS became the obvious choice after that.

Old 01-02-22 | 09:38 AM
  #664  
t2d2's Avatar
t2d2
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,691
Likes: 237
From: Location: Location!
Default

Aha, not what I envisioned by "retired."
Old 01-02-22 | 10:23 AM
  #665  
Kira X's Avatar
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 450
From: 東京都
Talking

Originally Posted by Blkexcoupe
I'm still keeping it, but I haven't driven it since before thanksgiving.

I don't think anyone is crazy enough to pay what I would want for my SC. The SC has more $$ into it than the GS cost.

It's hardly a sad day. The SC has been "complete" for a while now. It's time for a new project.

Thank you! I always thought my next Lexus would be a the RC-F, but I didn't care for it after driving the car. It felt like too much of boat for the amount of money. The GS became the obvious choice after that.
I’m happy to hear that. You have one of the best SC’s out there.

The GS was a good choice. I feel the same way about the RC-F and would have trouble deciding between the two cars. Will you be modding the GS?
Old 01-02-22 | 02:07 PM
  #666  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by t2d2
Aha, not what I envisioned by "retired."
Retired is the word my friends keep using, so it stuck. I guess retired from being the project car is the best way to put it.

Originally Posted by Kira X
I’m happy to hear that. You have one of the best SC’s out there.

The GS was a good choice. I feel the same way about the RC-F and would have trouble deciding between the two cars. Will you be modding the GS?
If I could afford a GS-F at the moment, I would have went that route, but it's a little too much to be a driveway ornament.

I'm definitely going to change a few things on the GS to make it mine, but I haven't decided how far I want to take it yet. It's such a nice car from the factory. I almost feel like anything I do will make it worse.
The following users liked this post:
Kira X (01-02-22)
Old 01-02-22 | 02:44 PM
  #667  
CLass of 1's Avatar
CLass of 1
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 296
From: FL
Default

Personally, I think you should wheels and suspension at least. It is an awesome car no doubt but car guys like us can’t resist!

For what it’s worth, a 2UR-GSE is only about 8 grand with the transmission…

Good luck with everything dude. Would love to see you finish your manual swap on the SC. I think if you did, you’d drive the SC more. Having two comfy, automatic cruisers to me means you’ll hardly ever drive the SC anymore. Would be a shame.

Nick
Old 01-02-22 | 09:30 PM
  #668  
Kira X's Avatar
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 450
From: 東京都
Talking

Originally Posted by Blkexcoupe
Retired is the word my friends keep using, so it stuck. I guess retired from being the project car is the best way to put it.

If I could afford a GS-F at the moment, I would have went that route, but it's a little too much to be a driveway ornament.

I'm definitely going to change a few things on the GS to make it mine, but I haven't decided how far I want to take it yet. It's such a nice car from the factory. I almost feel like anything I do will make it worse.
The GS-F is pricey, even used with a lot of miles. I can totally understand that. What year is the GS? It looks like the refreshed 2016+.

You can’t go wrong with wheels and a drop. It’s extremely nice stock but you buy high quality parts judging by your SC build. Unfortunately the big body cars like the GS get expensive to mod after the basic wheels/drop.
Old 01-02-22 | 10:54 PM
  #669  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by CLass of 1
Personally, I think you should wheels and suspension at least. It is an awesome car no doubt but car guys like us can’t resist!

For what it’s worth, a 2UR-GSE is only about 8 grand with the transmission…

Good luck with everything dude. Would love to see you finish your manual swap on the SC. I think if you did, you’d drive the SC more. Having two comfy, automatic cruisers to me means you’ll hardly ever drive the SC anymore. Would be a shame.

Nick
I actually have everything to manual swap the car. All brand new oem pedals, shifter bezel, manual transmission tunnel, transmission, differential, and drive shaft. It's just there is no way for it to pass emissions here in CA, so there was no benefit for me to convert it and have stock power. In about a week, it'll be 14 years since I bought the SC. I'm more than happy with how the car turned out and it drives fantastic.


Originally Posted by Kira X
The GS-F is pricey, even used with a lot of miles. I can totally understand that. What year is the GS? It looks like the refreshed 2016+.

You can’t go wrong with wheels and a drop. It’s extremely nice stock but you buy high quality parts judging by your SC build. Unfortunately the big body cars like the GS get expensive to mod after the basic wheels/drop.
It's a 2018 that came off of a lease. I bought it CPO.

There is something relaxing about having a nice stock car to drive when all your cars are modified.


The following 2 users liked this post by Blkexcoupe:
Kira X (01-03-22), ThomasGS4 (01-03-22)
Old 01-03-22 | 07:46 AM
  #670  
Kira X's Avatar
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 450
From: 東京都
Talking

Originally Posted by Blkexcoupe
I actually have everything to manual swap the car. All brand new oem pedals, shifter bezel, manual transmission tunnel, transmission, differential, and drive shaft. It's just there is no way for it to pass emissions here in CA, so there was no benefit for me to convert it and have stock power. In about a week, it'll be 14 years since I bought the SC. I'm more than happy with how the car turned out and it drives fantastic.


It's a 2018 that came off of a lease. I bought it CPO.

There is something relaxing about having a nice stock car to drive when all your cars are modified.
2018 is a good year and a CPO Lexus IS the best used car to buy!

You’re absolutely right about that. You don’t have to worry about potholes or people messing with your car as much when it’s stock. My GS is still stock for that reason.
Old 01-16-22 | 06:46 AM
  #671  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

Fired the SC up for the first time in 2 months a few days ago. It needed to be jump started since I forgot to plug in the tender.

I drove it for a few days to make sure everything was ready for emissions testing. Luckily the battery wasn't super dead, so all the monitors were good to go and it passed with flying colors.



The following 3 users liked this post by Blkexcoupe:
KahnBB6 (01-18-22), Kira X (01-16-22), ThomasGS4 (01-16-22)
Old 01-16-22 | 09:29 PM
  #672  
Kira X's Avatar
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン
CL Folding 10,000
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 450
From: 東京都
Default

Still looking good! It looks like you’ve got the HRE’s back on too!
Old 01-18-22 | 09:49 PM
  #673  
KahnBB6's Avatar
KahnBB6
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 1,253
From: FL & CA
Default

Congratulations on the new GS!! It looks great and I bet it drives very smooth!

I agree with the others that, depending on how it feels on your most commonly used roads, some suspension tuning, even if using all OEM GS-F parts could dial it in even more. A limited slip differential swap (if not already equipped from the factory) would be a great long term modification But I hear you on not exactly wanting to get into modification with this one as your brand new to you daily.

Originally Posted by Blkexcoupe
I actually have everything to manual swap the car. All brand new oem pedals, shifter bezel, manual transmission tunnel, transmission, differential, and drive shaft. It's just there is no way for it to pass emissions here in CA, so there was no benefit for me to convert it and have stock power. In about a week, it'll be 14 years since I bought the SC. I'm more than happy with how the car turned out and it drives fantastic.
First, congratulations on the successful smog test!

It really is a crime that something as simple as one model year in the same vehicle makes all the difference to the ARB in terms of you being allowed to swap it to a factory manual configuration or not. Your car is already completely set up in every other way.

We were looking into the feasibility a while back of converting a 98-00 SC300's stock 2JZ-GE VVT-i with the ECU and electronics from a 2002-2005 IS300 5-speed M/T since it's using the same engine but the issue of early CANBUS signals (I think) got in the way. I think it is technically possible but it's a lot of custom wiring work to get all of that to talk to the SC chassis with no CEL codes, including those for the IS300 ECU's additional airbag monitors.

Still, for the right car (ie: one just like yours) it could be worth it.

The only mechanical snag that might get in the way is that IS300 5-speed M/T's came with 3.7:1 final drive ratios while the SC300 5-speeds all came with 4.083:1's... and I'd argue a stock SC300 5-speed is still much more fun an usable on California's mountain roads with the SC300 A/T's 4.272:1 final drive ratio. Years ago I passed many times with the 4.272 ratio in my stock 5-speed but the question would be whether or not the test would be thrown off when the IS300's configuration and ECU are set up for 3.7:1 and not 4.083 or 4.272.

A fairly easily sourced 3.769:1 diff from a Supra TT Auto / SC430 / Aristo could match the IS300 5-speed's final drive configuration easily but would it be ideal NA gearing in the slightly heavier SC300 body?

Anyway, you've got a beautiful SC already and now a great GS addition to your garage! "Retiring" your SC in a way makes it an event any time you decide to take it out to enjoy rather than using it day in day out
Old 01-19-22 | 07:09 PM
  #674  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Kira X
Still looking good! It looks like you’ve got the HRE’s back on too!
The car has been on HRE for a while. The car with the CCW is a different car that was made to look identical, so we can cruise around and confuse people. LOL

Originally Posted by KahnBB6
Congratulations on the new GS!! It looks great and I bet it drives very smooth!

I agree with the others that, depending on how it feels on your most commonly used roads, some suspension tuning, even if using all OEM GS-F parts could dial it in even more. A limited slip differential swap (if not already equipped from the factory) would be a great long term modification But I hear you on not exactly wanting to get into modification with this one as your brand new to you daily.



First, congratulations on the successful smog test!

It really is a crime that something as simple as one model year in the same vehicle makes all the difference to the ARB in terms of you being allowed to swap it to a factory manual configuration or not. Your car is already completely set up in every other way.

We were looking into the feasibility a while back of converting a 98-00 SC300's stock 2JZ-GE VVT-i with the ECU and electronics from a 2002-2005 IS300 5-speed M/T since it's using the same engine but the issue of early CANBUS signals (I think) got in the way. I think it is technically possible but it's a lot of custom wiring work to get all of that to talk to the SC chassis with no CEL codes, including those for the IS300 ECU's additional airbag monitors.

Still, for the right car (ie: one just like yours) it could be worth it.

The only mechanical snag that might get in the way is that IS300 5-speed M/T's came with 3.7:1 final drive ratios while the SC300 5-speeds all came with 4.083:1's... and I'd argue a stock SC300 5-speed is still much more fun an usable on California's mountain roads with the SC300 A/T's 4.272:1 final drive ratio. Years ago I passed many times with the 4.272 ratio in my stock 5-speed but the question would be whether or not the test would be thrown off when the IS300's configuration and ECU are set up for 3.7:1 and not 4.083 or 4.272.

A fairly easily sourced 3.769:1 diff from a Supra TT Auto / SC430 / Aristo could match the IS300 5-speed's final drive configuration easily but would it be ideal NA gearing in the slightly heavier SC300 body?

Anyway, you've got a beautiful SC already and now a great GS addition to your garage! "Retiring" your SC in a way makes it an event any time you decide to take it out to enjoy rather than using it day in day out
Thanks, the GS is actually a weekend car. I had my SC for 6 years before I started modifying it. I didn't want to mess with the car until I had enough cars to make it exactly how I wanted it. The same will probably happen to the GS.

My daily is a 2006 Acura TSX.



I've looked into converting the IS300 setup into the SC before too, but not for manual. I wanted to try putting the shiftable automatic into the SC, but all the canbus stuff went over my head.

It took a while for me to be okay with keeping the car automatic and not going turbo. I always felt like that would be the last thing to make my car perfect. Every time I looked into doing it, there was no way I would be able to get what I wanted for less than $30k. I decided buying another car was a better use of that money.

I'll keep all my spare stuff and maybe one day in the future I'll build another SC that's manual and na-t.
The following 2 users liked this post by Blkexcoupe:
KahnBB6 (01-19-22), Kira X (01-21-22)
Old 02-27-22 | 08:05 AM
  #675  
Blkexcoupe's Avatar
Blkexcoupe
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 551
From: California
Default

SC was temporarily kicked out of the garage, so I could ceramic coat the GS.



I drove the SC this week since it was outside getting dirty, but now it's all washed up back under the cover plugged into a tender.





Quick Reply: My indecisive 98 SC300 build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 AM.