View Poll Results: Would your next car be a Lexus?
Yes
71
56.35%
No
32
25.40%
Not sure
23
18.25%
Voters: 126. You may not vote on this poll
Do you think your next car will be a Lexus?
10-28-03, 04:09 PM
#4
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get me wrong, I love my IS but...if Nissan brings out a twin-turbo drop-top 350z....I might change my mind real quick. :-)
Last edited by UncleNick; 10-29-03 at 09:39 AM.
10-28-03, 04:32 PM
#5
Lead Lap
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no twin turbo Z 
thats why they removed the X from the ZX. X = turbo. ie: 240sx 180sx 200sx 300zx were all turbo
im waiting for the skyline R35 and the nissan S15 in 2006-2007. v8 twin turbo on the R35, the s15 will have the same sr20det motor
the only lexus i like is the IS series, althought i never had a choice on my car. i just accept what i get.
thats why they removed the X from the ZX. X = turbo. ie: 240sx 180sx 200sx 300zx were all turbo
im waiting for the skyline R35 and the nissan S15 in 2006-2007. v8 twin turbo on the R35, the s15 will have the same sr20det motor
the only lexus i like is the IS series, althought i never had a choice on my car. i just accept what i get.
10-28-03, 05:06 PM
#6
Lexus Test Driver
I love my SC, but if the wife decides she needs a 4 door, then GS here I come.
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
10-28-03, 05:09 PM
#7
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rushgator2112
I
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
I
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
Trending Topics
A Lexus is always a sensible choice ! 
10-28-03, 06:29 PM
#10
Rookie
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my next car will be have a budget abt 25-30K, but it will be preowned...i want awd and stick, and thus the preowned a6 2.7T's are calling my name 
...however, once the new gs falls into that range, I'll probably get one as long as it has awd, even if it doesnt have a stick 
i learned my lesson, no more new cars for me, the depreciation is murder! (even if its a JAp )
...however, once the new gs falls into that range, I'll probably get one as long as it has awd, even if it doesnt have a stick i learned my lesson, no more new cars for me, the depreciation is murder! (even if its a JAp
)
10-29-03, 09:40 AM
#11
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No - Lexus doesn't make the car I want.
If the GS came in a manual transmission, then maybe. I am getting ready to replace my 95 Acura Legend 6-speed coupe (145,000 miles) with either an Infiniti G35 6MT sedan or an Acura 04 6MT TL.
If the GS came in a manual transmission, then maybe. I am getting ready to replace my 95 Acura Legend 6-speed coupe (145,000 miles) with either an Infiniti G35 6MT sedan or an Acura 04 6MT TL.
10-29-03, 03:06 PM
#12
Lead Lap
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rushgator2112
I love my SC, but if the wife decides she needs a 4 door, then GS here I come.
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
I love my SC, but if the wife decides she needs a 4 door, then GS here I come.
BTW, NRG, the X model designation on a Nissan does not universally denote a turbo throughout the model line. For example, the 300ZX model had a turbo version available, and it was called the 300ZX TT. All other N/A Z cars from 90-96 were called 300ZX, but they did not have a turbo. (there was also the 2+2 model, non turbo only) Also, the same goes for 200SX, 240SX, 280ZX, etc. X does not necessarily denote a turbo. Seen an Xterra lately?
When i ment the X in the name.. i mean that they offer turbo in those models..
if you look back. all the nissan name with the X in it, all had turbo. the ones without the X didnt.
im board, ill name them all.
200SX: early version (early 80's-88) S11/S12 chassis code, coupe/fastback, RWD, 4/6 cyl power (CA18ET (turbo), VG30E, etc.), sold as the 200SX in the US and the Silvia/Gazelle in other markets.
200SX: later version (1995-98), B14 chassis code. FWD, with two engine choices, a 1.6, and a DOHC 2.0 (SR20DE)/(SR20DET-bluebird).
NO TURBO: 240Z/260Z/280Z - (1970-1978), S30Z chassis code, RWD, I-6 L-series power, ranging from 2.4 to 2.8 litres. Sold as the Fairlady in Japan.
280ZX - (1979-1983) - S130Z chassis code, RWD, looks kinda like an S30, but much more bulky and uglier. Available with a 2.8 turbo. AKA Fairlady
300ZX ('84-'89) Z31 chassis code, VG30 V6 powered, in turbo or NA-form, RWD, aka Fairlady
240SX ('89-'94) S13 chassis code - coupe/fastback/convertible body types, RWD, powered by a KA24E ('89-'90) or KA24DE ('91-'94) 4 cyl in the US, but sold with CA18DE (NA) or CA18DET (turbo) in '89-'90 in other parts of the world and with the SR20DE (NA) and SR20DET (turbo) '91-'94. Sold as the Silvia/180SX/200SX in other countries.
240SX ('95-'98) S14 chassis code, coupe only - same thing applies, but all powered by KA24DE in the US and SR20DE/DET in other areas.
300ZX ('90-'96) Z32 chassis code, coupe/convertible/2+2, RWD, VG30DE (NA) or VG30DETT (turbo)
NO TURBO: 350Z ('00-'04) Z33 chassis code, coupe/convertible, RWD, Z VQ35DE V6 Powered NA aka Fairlady
The 2+2 model of the Fairlady is the Nissan skyline u35 aka Infinite G35
Last edited by NRG; 10-29-03 at 03:07 PM.
10-29-03, 03:29 PM
#13
I vote NO. I love my Lexus and the customer service. But unless Lexus steps up the HP on the V8, I think I'll go with a Benz. AMG is having way too much fun building these cars....
Last edited by LXOGOOD; 10-29-03 at 03:33 PM.
10-29-03, 03:51 PM
#14
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: D2'sville
Posts: 13,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YYYEESSS
I am a Lexus man for life!!! (well at least for my next car!!). I'm car shopping right now, and I only will accept Lexus. Name another marque that grants brand equity, PROVEN reliability, great styling, modern interior design, and performance (400s or BOOSTED 300s
), all at a decent price! Of course this varies among models, but I'm finding the 2nd Gen GS and 1st Gen SC to be availible at reasonble prices
To be totally honest, I think I wanna stay with Lexus in some part due to this forum, there is a WEALTH of info here, plus I have met, and interacted with some great folks, just look at all the past Lexus owners that still post!!
), all at a decent price! Of course this varies among models, but I'm finding the 2nd Gen GS and 1st Gen SC to be availible at reasonble pricesTo be totally honest, I think I wanna stay with Lexus in some part due to this forum, there is a WEALTH of info here, plus I have met, and interacted with some great folks, just look at all the past Lexus owners that still post!!
10-29-03, 03:51 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
I ain't going anywhere. I am happy with TOTAL ownership. From my car, to my dealer, to ya'll, I am happy.
I know Lexus won't make a AMG/M competitor, so like Mr. Johnson, my main man Jaimie, etc I will make my own A SC/GS/IS 300 of some sort with forced induction is in my future. Or even a GS 400 supercharged.
One of my pet peeves is buying ***** that don't work. It drives me nuts. From a pen, to a stove, to a t.v to a car. No way I am taking a chance leaving Lexus until I am a multi-millionaire.
I know Lexus won't make a AMG/M competitor, so like Mr. Johnson, my main man Jaimie, etc I will make my own
A SC/GS/IS 300 of some sort with forced induction is in my future. Or even a GS 400 supercharged.One of my pet peeves is buying ***** that don't work. It drives me nuts. From a pen, to a stove, to a t.v to a car. No way I am taking a chance leaving Lexus until I am a multi-millionaire.