Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

General Car Conversation 2024 - part 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-24, 07:55 PM
  #2101  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,840
Received 95 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
For most buyers including me, the additional low end power makes the experience an upgrade not a downgrade. Once you get used to turbo power bands these old V6s really feel slow around town.

Is it marginally less smooth and refined feeling? Maybe…but modern cars are so well isolated that it’s really not a big deal. I thought the turbo 4 in that K5 I rented in Alabama a couple years ago felt totally at home in that car.

Now a Mercedes or a Lexus? I want a turbo 6 not a turbo 4, but I also don’t want a NA 6. SL43 and C63 are stupid, but for a mainstream family
car? Different story
Some people really just don't want their torque to peak until 4500 RPM.

FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 07:57 PM
  #2102  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
For most buyers including me, the additional low end power makes the experience an upgrade not a downgrade. Once you get used to turbo power bands these old V6s really feel slow around town.

Is it marginally less smooth and refined feeling? Maybe…but modern cars are so well isolated that it’s really not a big deal. I thought the turbo 4 in that K5 I rented in Alabama a couple years ago felt totally at home in that car.

Now a Mercedes or a Lexus? I want a turbo 6 not a turbo 4, but I also don’t want a NA 6. SL43 and C63 are stupid, but for a mainstream family
car? Different story
Members who object aren’t really complaining about the turbos…the objection is to having to buy a motor with less cylinders. The LX should be a V8
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 08:01 PM
  #2103  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,035
Received 2,726 Likes on 1,953 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
Members who object aren’t really complaining about the turbos…they are abjection is to having to buy a motor with less cylinders. The LX should be a V8
I get that, but that’s just not the reality of the world we’re in. That’s a mental hangup, and we’re not talking about luxury cars, we’re talking about mainstream cars. LX should have a V8 available I agree, but is it an issue that the Highlander only comes in a 4 now? I don’t see how it is.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 08:04 PM
  #2104  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
LX should have a V8 available I agree, but is it an issue that the Highlander only comes in a 4 now? I don’t see how it is.
The Highlander should have a newly developed small 3.0 V6 with a turbo. The four should be the option. But MPG is not different. Like 1MPG

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 03-04-24 at 08:08 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 08:24 PM
  #2105  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,035
Received 2,726 Likes on 1,953 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
The Highlander should have a newly developed small 3.0 V6 with a turbo. The four should be the option. But MPG is not different. Like 1MPG
I think for the vast majority of buyers the 4 is fine. Now the RX and TX are another story.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 08:28 PM
  #2106  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I think for the vast majority of buyers the 4 is fine. Now the RX and TX are another story.
Toyota used to have a 300hp hybrid V6 Highlander. They should have offered something. The new Highlighter hybrid is a downgrade
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 09:10 PM
  #2107  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,035
Received 2,726 Likes on 1,953 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
Toyota used to have a 300hp hybrid V6 Highlander. They should have offered something. The new Highlighter hybrid is a downgrade
Way better economy which is what most people want
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-04-24, 09:53 PM
  #2108  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,840
Received 95 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Once again, the Highlander falls into that category of car where the vast majority of drivers couldn't tell you how it's powered.

FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 01:00 AM
  #2109  
Lwerewolf
Instructor
 
Lwerewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sofia
Posts: 1,242
Received 249 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Way better economy which is what most people want
2.4t at6 vs 3.5 atkinson ecvt isn't exactly "way better" economically. If we're talking the 2.5 vs 3.5 - yes, around town it should be better.
Lwerewolf is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 02:35 AM
  #2110  
BayeauxLex
Instructor
 
BayeauxLex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: LA
Posts: 1,025
Received 185 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
and don't forget much of that just comes down to the transmission, once you get moving the newer car will start to lose the gearing advantage

but yes once you get used to the effortless wafty V8 which has no trouble at ANY speed and rpm, the boosted 4 cyl feels labored and unrefined before the turbo wakes up... and once it does there's only like 1000 rpm of "the fun part" before the torque delivery becomes monotonous and dreary sounds fill the cabin lol

https://youtu.be/C2s4ETiRwCA?t=838

https://youtu.be/DNbCllKH3ls?t=10

ahh that's more like it muscley V8 philharmonic
Originally Posted by Stroock639
definitely can't agree here... epics like the original M3, 190E cosworth, S2000, mitsubishi EVO, WRX STI, and the AE86 corolla all have fabulous sounding 4 cylinders

The 6 cylinder in the Porsche sounds good though.
BayeauxLex is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 05:30 AM
  #2111  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Way better economy which is what most people want
The new 4 cylinder HL only gains 1 mpg in efficiency over the outgoing V6...has increased service compared to the V6. A new V6 absolutely would have been a good idea. Toyota could have offered a V6 in the Sienna van
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 06:14 AM
  #2112  
Carfan94
Intermediate
 
Carfan94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: TN
Posts: 488
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
The new 4 cylinder HL only gains 1 mpg in efficiency over the outgoing V6...has increased service compared to the V6. A new V6 absolutely would have been a good idea. Toyota could have offered a V6 in the Sienna van
Agreed. Mazda and Honda are still using 6 cylinder engines in their large crossovers.
Carfan94 is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 06:17 AM
  #2113  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carfan94
Agreed. Mazda and Honda are still using 6 cylinder engines in their large crossovers.
And those 6 cylinders in the Honda and Mazda are all new too.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 06:18 AM
  #2114  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,035
Received 2,726 Likes on 1,953 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
The new 4 cylinder HL only gains 1 mpg in efficiency over the outgoing V6...has increased service compared to the V6. A new V6 absolutely would have been a good idea. Toyota could have offered a V6 in the Sienna van
You need to look that up again…it gets 6MPG more on the highway 5 MPG more in the city and 6 more combined. That is 20% better fuel economy.



As for the Sienna, they sell all the Siennas they can make and the incredible fuel economy is one of the reasons everybody I know who has one tells me they bought it.

Like it or not consumers just don’t care about the bigger engine options, they want fuel economy.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-05-24, 06:26 AM
  #2115  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,958
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
You need to look that up again…it gets 6MPG more on the highway 5 MPG more in the city and 6 more combined. That is 20% better fuel economy.
.
The regular gas V6 gets 1MPG over the new I4. That what I was referring to. So if Toyota had a new V6, absolutely they could get similar miles to the outgoing V6. The Sienna doesn't have enough power some say. It is the downsizing that is of concern.
Toys4RJill is offline  


Quick Reply: General Car Conversation 2024 - part 1



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 AM.