Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

General Car Conversation 2024 - part 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-24, 09:16 AM
  #5881  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,910
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Oh I was talking in general too, not at you.

It says 91, but as I've said I think that's BS.

I will let everyone know if the drivability is different now, remember guys I've owned it 3 years now....

I'd like to move on, duly noted to those who think I'm wrong.
Not to drag this on and I'll end it here, but Dyno's don't lie. You are not going to necessarily "feel" the extra torque, but it's there. Also, your engine would normally knock at hard throttle, but the ECU is pulling timing to prevent that. 100 percent 87 is not going to hurt your engine, many people put regular in their cars that require premium, but you are not getting the full benefits. But you know, at the end of the day, you are not hurting anything by using Regular, so if that's what you feel is the best, than more power (or less ) to you
AMIRZA786 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:30 AM
  #5882  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,368
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Not to drag this on and I'll end it here, but Dyno's don't lie. You are not going to necessarily "feel" the extra torque, but it's there. Also, your engine would normally knock at hard throttle, but the ECU is pulling timing to prevent that. 100 percent 87 is not going to hurt your engine, many people put regular in their cars that require premium, but you are not getting the full benefits. But you know, at the end of the day, you are not hurting anything by using Regular, so if that's what you feel is the best, than more power (or less ) to you
This has been our point all along, nobody is saying it will hurt the car. It’s not going to hurt the engine but I personally want all the performance that the car can offer and I want that more than I want to save $20 per tank. For others fuel cost savings is more important and I understand that.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:35 AM
  #5883  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,910
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
This has been our point all along, nobody is saying it will hurt the car. It’s not going to hurt the engine but I personally want all the performance that the car can offer and I want that more than I want to save $20 per tank. For others fuel cost savings is more important and I understand that.
I'm with you on that. My 2006 Camry SE recommended Premium for best performance, so I used Premium. My IS350 required premium, and I could have put regular in it, but I used Premium to get the most out of the engine. My 2013 Sienna on the other hand recommends 87, so I use regular because then I would be actually wasting money
AMIRZA786 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:41 AM
  #5884  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,355
Received 1,229 Likes on 914 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
It's actually not a very complicated issue. Higher compression engines, and many engines with turbo chargers require premium gas due to it's higher ignite point, while regular gasoline has a lower flash point, and the higher heat generated by performance engines can pre ignite the fuel causing engine knock, which is why they pull timing. So if you drive a Toyota Corolla, you don't need premium.

Better yet, check the owners manual, and save yourself a big fight with your fellow forum members
Correct......we never said otherwise. I only said to check YOUR engines spark table to see if your exact individual engine is okay with the gas you feed it.

My jag said 91+ octane only, it was fine on 89 with the new knock sensors and full refresh on the new engine I put in it. Never pulled timing......other ones pull on 91
Striker223 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:42 AM
  #5885  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,355
Received 1,229 Likes on 914 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
You don't either vehicle with the 18 year old 5.7 that went into hundreds of thousands of trucks asking for 87, yet I can't find one instance of engine damage caused by cheap fuel and I've looked.

And nobody's fighting, I'm not. I just said it's absurd to suggest I'm missing 40ft/lbs of torque at 2500 RPM. I've run premium before and felt no difference. It's got a full tank of premium and we switched cars this week so I'll be driving the LX.
Look up UR engine oil consumption. There ya go!
Striker223 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:45 AM
  #5886  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,355
Received 1,229 Likes on 914 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Not to drag this on and I'll end it here, but Dyno's don't lie. You are not going to necessarily "feel" the extra torque, but it's there. Also, your engine would normally knock at hard throttle, but the ECU is pulling timing to prevent that. 100 percent 87 is not going to hurt your engine, many people put regular in their cars that require premium, but you are not getting the full benefits. But you know, at the end of the day, you are not hurting anything by using Regular, so if that's what you feel is the best, than more power (or less ) to you
It absolutely will hurt it, timing pull occurs AFTER detonation even if very very minor. Drive that for a while and you will lose leakdown and start eating oil like SO MANY cars do. The emissions side of the equation requires the timing to pull and the mix to go rich as well to protect the cats and that increases carbon buildup in the rings.....and that gets you your oil consumption.

You really do not want any engine riding the knock sensors if you can avoid it
Striker223 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:46 AM
  #5887  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,243
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123

It says 91, but as I've said I think that's BS.
.
By why is it BS? What would Lexus benefit for saying you need 91 and not 87?

I think your LX get around 362HP when you use 87…I think the LC 5.7 dials it back too

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 07-18-24 at 09:51 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:47 AM
  #5888  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,910
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
It absolutely will hurt it, timing pull occurs AFTER detonation even if very very minor. Drive that for a while and you will lose leakdown and start eating oil like SO MANY cars do. The emissions side of the equation requires the timing to pull and the mix to go rich as well to protect the cats and that increases carbon buildup in the rings.....and that gets you your oil consumption.

You really do not want any engine riding the knock sensors if you can avoid it
You're the expert here, so there you go, I stand corrected
AMIRZA786 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:53 AM
  #5889  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,522
Received 3,823 Likes on 1,933 Posts
Default

The way I always look at this is... if you deviate from what the manufacturer recommends, whatever happens after that is on you.

Now, there are some cases where the manufacturer's recommendation is not great - for example, stating the transmission fluid in many Lexus models is a "lifetime fluid". I don't think it takes a degree in engineering to figure out that the transmission fluid is... uh, doing a lot, and thus, it is getting heat-cycled and broken down over time. It makes sense to replace it every few years/10's of 1000's of miles.
arentz07 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 09:57 AM
  #5890  
Margate330
Lexus Test Driver
 
Margate330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 7,172
Received 1,007 Likes on 802 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
...
Now, there are some cases where the manufacturer's recommendation is not great - for example, stating the transmission fluid in many Lexus models is a "lifetime fluid"...
You're being way too nice. Lol
I'll turn the dial up from "Not great" to very wrong. Haha

No such thing as life time fluids, mfg recommendations are debunked. Lol
Margate330 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 10:00 AM
  #5891  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,368
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

That’s my mentality, maintain the car at least the way the manufacturer recommends. When something is “lifetime” you have to ask yourself what do they consider the vehicles life? Is it 150,000 miles? Probably. So if you want to keep it longer than 150,000 miles you are going to be well served by changing that fluid. Same with oil change intervals. If you’re going to keep it for 100k+ you should change the oil more often than every 10k
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 10:08 AM
  #5892  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,910
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,688 Posts
Default

I change the "Lifetime" fluid in my Sienna about every 70K. I'm currently on 170k, so about to do another "Lifetime" fluid swap
AMIRZA786 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 10:10 AM
  #5893  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,522
Received 3,823 Likes on 1,933 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
That’s my mentality, maintain the car at least the way the manufacturer recommends. When something is “lifetime” you have to ask yourself what do they consider the vehicles life? Is it 150,000 miles? Probably. So if you want to keep it longer than 150,000 miles you are going to be well served by changing that fluid. Same with oil change intervals. If you’re going to keep it for 100k+ you should change the oil more often than every 10k
Yeah, kinda weird wording. "Lifetime" of what - the vehicle? The transmission? Maybe Lexus would rather we didn't think too hard about it...

Planning to do my transmission fluid every 40k, FWIW. That seems to be a common practice for folks with cars that have this transmission, especially given I drive it spiritedly.
arentz07 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 10:12 AM
  #5894  
geko29
Super Moderator

Thread Starter
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 7,953
Received 303 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Margate330
No such thing as life time fluids, mfg recommendations are debunked. Lol
My favorite is when the car manufacturer says the trans fluid is lifetime, but the transmission manufacturer says "eeh, not so much. Change it every 60 or 80k".
geko29 is offline  
Old 07-18-24, 10:17 AM
  #5895  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,910
Received 2,170 Likes on 1,688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
My favorite is when the car manufacturer says the trans fluid is lifetime, but the transmission manufacturer says "eeh, not so much. Change it every 60 or 80k".
In this same note, Toyota recommends 10k oil changes on their vehicles, but I still do 5k. I used to send my samples occasionally to Blackstone, and they told me based on the results that I could go about 7k or 8k (I use fully synthetic), but I still stick to 5k
AMIRZA786 is offline  


Quick Reply: General Car Conversation 2024 - part 1



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 PM.