Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

First IIHS Semi-Autonomous Safeguard Testing Fails Nearly Every Automaker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-24, 01:25 AM
  #16  
703
Lead Lap
 
703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,836
Received 794 Likes on 539 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
I
In fact, on the news today there was a fatality where a woman drowned after hitting something wrong on the screen:

https://jalopnik.com/a-tesla-touchscreen-mix-up-killed-angela-chao-report-1851327161
Not just any woman. A high profile CEO of a major corporation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Chao

Tesla design choices contributed to her death.

She was using the touch screen for 3 point turn. Touch screen doesn’t give you muscle memory if the car is in reverse or drive.

Submerged in a pond, her electric door release may have malfunctioned. In panic, she probably didn’t know or forgot about manual release.

Flushed door handles would have prevented her friends who dived in from opening the door.

I know Tesla fans will jump out defending these design choices yada yada ya.



703 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 02:57 AM
  #17  
asj2024
Advanced
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 703
Not just any woman. A high profile CEO of a major corporation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Chao

Tesla design choices contributed to her death.

She was using the touch screen for 3 point turn. Touch screen doesn’t give you muscle memory if the car is in reverse or drive.

Submerged in a pond, her electric door release may have malfunctioned. In panic, she probably didn’t know or forgot about manual release.

Flushed door handles would have prevented her friends who dived in from opening the door.

I know Tesla fans will jump out defending these design choices yada yada ya.
Opening the door against water pressure would have been difficult I think. She'd have to wait until pressure equalizes as car fills up. It's worrying that cars today mostly have no manual window openers.

Cramming everything into screen without physical alternatives can also save manufacturer money I think. Less parts to add to vehicle. Still stupid though.

asj2024 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 04:59 AM
  #18  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,053
Received 311 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
The only two hands-free systems on this entire list are Lexus Teammate and GM Supercruise. The rest aren't, hence why the other Lexus system is also ranked at the bottom of the list. Lexus isn't doing anything special.
BMW's is also hands-free. As long as you remain attentive, you can easily go 20-30 minutes or even more without ever touching the wheel.
geko29 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 05:44 AM
  #19  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,552
Received 71 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
Opening the door against water pressure would have been difficult I think. She'd have to wait until pressure equalizes as car fills up. It's worrying that cars today mostly have no manual window openers.
Opening the door against water would have been impossible unless the entire interior was completely full of water.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 06:00 AM
  #20  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,053
Received 311 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
Opening the door against water would have been impossible unless the entire interior was completely full of water.
Yep. If you're really strong and have a fast reaction time, you can still open it while there's only 1-2" of coverage at the bottom of the door. But once it's much higher than that, no choice but to wait.
geko29 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 07:00 AM
  #21  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,859
Received 688 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
I find it stupid that it was called "autopilot"

Along with the huge screen in front that tries to do everything, this is probably why Tesla has the highest accident rate among all brands tested:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveba...h=9fc74e72894d
Not quite what it's made out to be.

"During the analyzed period, Tesla drivers had 23.54 accidents per 1,000 drivers on a countrywide level, followed by Ram with 22.76 accidents and Subaru with 20.90 accidents. That said, we need to remember that these numbers come from insurance quotes, not service data. A driver who has an accident on his record from when he owned a Ford bought a Tesla and is looking to get insurance, hence the number of Tesla drivers that have been in an accident increases."

https://insideevs.com/news/702055/te...-probably-not/

Mike728 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 07:28 AM
  #22  
asj2024
Advanced
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 703
Not just any woman. A high profile CEO of a major corporation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Chao

Tesla design choices contributed to her death.

She was using the touch screen for 3 point turn. Touch screen doesn’t give you muscle memory if the car is in reverse or drive.

Submerged in a pond, her electric door release may have malfunctioned. In panic, she probably didn’t know or forgot about manual release.

Flushed door handles would have prevented her friends who dived in from opening the door.

I know Tesla fans will jump out defending these design choices yada yada ya.
So I read some more, and as expected the marketing bs is the problem. This is likely one reason why Teslas are involved in so many accidents. The company itself and idiot drivers who believe the hype. Which then leads to deaths, expensive repairs, or the junking of the car itself if the battery is damaged.

Sold by other car bands using language like “adaptive cruise control,” Tesla’s “full self driving” is actually a driving assist feature, and legally, drivers are still required to be paying attention to the task at hand, and control the vehicle when needed. Unfortunately, there have been a number of reported accidents where Tesla drivers were literally asleep at the wheel, or otherwise distracted. Those critical of Tesla say the company’s language misrepresented the capabilities of the car, and lulled drivers into thinking they could focus on things other than driving while their vehicles took control.

Indeed, such is the magnitude of the problem that Tesla is recalling nearly 2 million vehicles to update the Autosteer function of its Autopilot software – nearly every vehicle it has sold in the United States. In a statement, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says, "in certain circumstances when Autosteer is engaged, the prominence and scope of the feature's controls may not be sufficient to prevent driver misuse” of the driver-assistance features

https://www.greencars.com/expert-ins...y-brand-report

Last edited by asj2024; 03-13-24 at 07:48 AM.
asj2024 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 07:34 AM
  #23  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,859
Received 688 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
Tesla is recalling nearly 2 million vehicles to update the Autosteer function of its Autopilot software –
That was the SW update I referred to earlier in this thread. That should take care of the issue with people sleeping, as it warns you if you take your eyes off the road for just a couple seconds. I think it's funny that they had to send out a recall letter, for an OTA SW update.
Mike728 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 08:13 AM
  #24  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,684
Received 1,251 Likes on 932 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike728
That was the SW update I referred to earlier in this thread. That should take care of the issue with people sleeping, as it warns you if you take your eyes off the road for just a couple seconds. I think it's funny that they had to send out a recall letter, for an OTA SW update.
Do the Tesla have good eye tracking? What is the solution if people find a way to bypass it like the stupid wheel weight things?

Striker223 is online now  
Old 03-13-24, 08:21 AM
  #25  
Allen K
-0----0-
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,563
Received 812 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

You can't stop stupid people from doing stupid things. If we're going to protect people from themselves, should we also lower the max speed of cars?
Allen K is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 08:27 AM
  #26  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,859
Received 688 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
Do the Tesla have good eye tracking? What is the solution if people find a way to bypass it like the stupid wheel weight things?
The driver facing camera seems to work really well, in a creepy kind of way. I don't know if there's a way to trick it, but you can cover it and just not use autopilot. I think the latest update also made it harder to trick the steering wheel sensors. I just change the audio volume up and down a notch to make it happy. It's really all just about ensuring that the driver is paying attention.
Mike728 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 08:34 AM
  #27  
TripleL
No Substitute

 
TripleL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 2,715
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Results are not too surprising given where we are in the development of this new product.
TripleL is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 09:06 AM
  #28  
Allen K
-0----0-
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,563
Received 812 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

@FrankReynoldsCPA updating the thread title to specify that the test was related to the safeguards associated with the systems and not the systems as a whole
Allen K is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 09:06 AM
  #29  
asj2024
Advanced
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
You can't stop stupid people from doing stupid things
I think deliberately fostering marketing bs to people (like the use of the words "full self driving" and "autopilot") in order to feed the hype and thus create major safety issues is not only irresponsible but dangerous.
asj2024 is offline  
Old 03-13-24, 09:16 AM
  #30  
Allen K
-0----0-
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,563
Received 812 Likes on 566 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
I think deliberately fostering marketing bs to people (like the use of the words "full self driving" and "autopilot") in order to feed the hype and thus create major safety issues is not only irresponsible but dangerous.
My old 3P with FSD drove me from NJ to DE with no interventions minus the occasional wiggle of the steering wheel and a stop to charge.
Allen K is offline  


Quick Reply: First IIHS Semi-Autonomous Safeguard Testing Fails Nearly Every Automaker



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 PM.