Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

What do you think about Toyota's strategy to move models to hybrid only?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-24, 07:00 AM
  #31  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,302
Received 2,513 Likes on 1,652 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Toyota is completely ignoring this to their peril.

scary graphs aside, lol, so if in 2023, 70% of 15.8% sales were BEVs that's 11%. so ice/hev were 'only' 89% of sales.

the EV market needs a battery, cost, or charging/availability breakthrough to go from 'early adopter' phase to 'mainstream'. when camry/rav4/f150 buyers decide to buy ev's instead, it's happened.

Originally Posted by asj2024
Interestingly enough, it also seems to be cleaner to produce gas than Li ion batteries, at least using today's technology. This one I did not know before doing research.
Saying that, electrified vehicles still beat pure ICE cars over the full life cycle of the car when it comes to total pollution.
keep doing that confirmation bias 'research' with bogus 'studies'.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 04-05-24, 07:05 AM
  #32  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
The popularity of hybrids and electrics is directly tied to gas pump prices. Everytime gas prices spike, hybrid and EV sales spike. Everytime gas prices drop, hybrid and EV sales slumber. This has been the case for years, but the media has never caught onto the connection. Instead, the headline, "no one is buying EV's" sells much better and our feeble society gobbles up the hype news.

So the point here is there will be ups and downs for gas/hybrid/EV car sales based on gas prices. No one particular answer or trend to what type of cars should be built for the future.
I feel like sales of hybrids and EVs have decoupled from gas prices. Up until this quarter, Tesla had record deliveries every quarter, even while gas prices were down over the last year to year and a half. People just realized the benefits of hybrids and that its best of both worlds at this point. Plus the new Prius Prime can almost keep up with some hot hatches and returns 50mpg+ is a testament to how far it has come.
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 07:12 AM
  #33  
asj2024
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
keep doing that confirmation bias 'research' with bogus 'studies'.
Pretty much all studies show that mining and production of Lithium ion batteries produce more pollutants.

https://elements.visualcapitalist.co...gine-vehicles/

https://climate360news.lmu.edu/lithi...as-we-thought/

That is, I'm not talking about considering the entire lifecycle, where electrified vehicles win over pure ICE over the long lifecycle, just the initial production of the vehicles.
asj2024 is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 07:12 AM
  #34  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
What this horrible strategy is actually doing is cementing Toyota into a technology that is going to be replaced by true zero emissions vehicles. Toyota is doing the opposite of what they did with hybrids 25 years ago, think long term. This is a short term play that will have disastrous consequences.

For me personally this ensures I will never buy a Toyota again.
Should they just dive head first into BEV and lose billions like Ford? Even Tesla is starting to struggle at this point. The battery tech is not ready, the charging infrastructure is not ready, consumers for the most part is not ready for the full transition. Even the government is smart enough to recognize those points. Why would Toyota, arguably, the smartest car company in the world dive head first into an empty pool?
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 07:20 AM
  #35  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 703
I think it’s just luck. They didn’t have a better crystal ball. It could have went the other way but they double down and is winning. Their share prices is trending the opposite of Tesla. Hence many commentators have said Toyotas have an anti Tesla strategy.


I have said many years ago here that Toyota should just focus on hybrids and let others invest, market and develop EVs. That is the most profitable strategy. So from a consumer perspective it’s simple - goto TMC for hybrids and elsewhere for EV. Simplicity works wonders.

Toyota has become a very risk adverse company. They will not invest in EV in any significant way unless there is a clear ROI. Hybrids are too profitable as the R&D is done.
I dont think I agree with Toyota becoming risk adverse. Waiting on the sidelines in itself is a huge risk, where they can easily be left behind in this fast moving world. Everything that Toyota does is highly calculated and well thought out and people criticized and laughed at them for not jumping head first into the EV market. They said EVs are not ready for prime time and multiple power train options is the way to go and they were absolutely spot on. Sure, hydrogen is a dud, EV is the future and the bridge to get there are hybrids.
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 07:29 AM
  #36  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Toyota is completely ignoring this to their peril.


What does the 2024 chart look like? You dont think the huge deceleration in growth from 2021 to 2023 is concerning?
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 07:35 AM
  #37  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,053
Received 311 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by situman
What does the 2024 chart look like? You dont think the huge deceleration in growth from 2021 to 2023 is concerning?
No one expected growth to continue to double every year. If it did, this year EVs would make up 2/3 of all car sales, and next year they would be 133%.
geko29 is online now  
Old 04-05-24, 08:28 AM
  #38  
asj2024
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
No one expected growth to continue to double every year. If it did, this year EVs would make up 2/3 of all car sales, and next year they would be 133%.
I think the problem is all plans expected significantly higher growth. One projection was 1.6 million vehicles in 2023 for the USA. It did not come close to that.

https://fortune.com/2024/01/08/us-ev...-will-johnson/

Such slow growth will not be good, given that total EVs in the USA are only less than 1% of all cars on the road.

The other problem for the automakers was the rise of Chinese EV automakers, who are now very good at making EV for low cost and thus controlling the largest auto market in the world, screwing not only Toyota but most other automakers, especially Tesla I would think.


asj2024 is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 08:44 AM
  #39  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
No one expected growth to continue to double every year. If it did, this year EVs would make up 2/3 of all car sales, and next year they would be 133%.
Why not? If the demand is there and the products are there, doubling of worldwide demand is child's play. Also, if the demand is truly there, there's no reason for the price cuts, especially here in the US. Yes China is trying to dump EVs and dominate the market with government subsidies, but if there's real demand, people would buy it at real prices.
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 08:51 AM
  #40  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,053
Received 311 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by situman
Why not? If the demand is there and the products are there, doubling of worldwide demand is child's play.
So you think it's totally logical to expect that, on a global sales volume of say, 75 million vehicles of all types in 2025, that 100 million of those will be EVs? You took different math courses than I did.
geko29 is online now  
Old 04-05-24, 09:06 AM
  #41  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
So you think it's totally logical to expect that, on a global sales volume of say, 75 million vehicles of all types in 2025, that 100 million of those will be EVs? You took different math courses than I did.
It's not about math. Its about trends. If EVs are expected to overtake ICE in the next 4 to 5 yrs, it has to grow at 50% or possibly yoy. It cant taper down to 25% growth and thats with price cuts and subsidies. You've captured the 10% of the market is are first movers and tech curious. The other 90% is going the sensible route with hybrids. Hyrbids are growing at the expense of EVs right now.
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 09:23 AM
  #42  
asj2024
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
asj2024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: NJ/FL
Posts: 555
Received 118 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by situman
It's not about math. Its about trends. If EVs are expected to overtake ICE in the next 4 to 5 yrs, it has to grow at 50% or possibly yoy. It cant taper down to 25% growth and thats with price cuts and subsidies. You've captured the 10% of the market is are first movers and tech curious. The other 90% is going the sensible route with hybrids. Hyrbids are growing at the expense of EVs right now.
BEVs are at 7% of new sales in the USA last I read. You won't take over anything at that rate anytime soon when 93% of new sales is hybrids and pure ICE, and you only make up less than 1% of the total cars on the road (and that includes PHEVs). Not unless there are large government mandates that last a couple or more decades.
asj2024 is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 09:28 AM
  #43  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,470
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
BEVs are at 7% of new sales in the USA last I read. You won't take over anything at that rate anytime soon when 93% of new sales is hybrids and pure ICE, and you only make up less than 1% of the total cars on the road (and that includes PHEVs). Not unless there are large government mandates that last a couple or more decades.
Well if your stats are accurate, then EVs should definitely have room to grow at a much higher rate than it is now and without price cuts. After all the early adopters and tech curious, most realize EVs are not for them yet. Take this article for what is worth.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tesla...134038780.html
situman is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 09:36 AM
  #44  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,363
Received 488 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by asj2024
Interestingly enough, it also seems to be cleaner to produce gas than Li ion batteries, at least using today's technology. This one I did not know before doing research.

Saying that, electrified vehicles still beat pure ICE cars over the full life cycle of the car when it comes to total pollution.
TMC is betting on hybrids - as a stop gap - until alternative battery chemistries boom, possibly in the next decade.

There is a lot more to motor vehicles than just 0-60, smoothness and quietness.

Battery chemistries must be:
1) Naturally abundant.
2) Not monopolised by "warmongering" nations [which cannot be discussed further].
3) Minimal mining and environmental impact.
4) Rapid charging.
5) High energy density for compactness, lightweight and long range.
6) Robust underpans - can't just scrape the underpan and be in for $40,000 because not covered under warranty.
7) Safety with minimal volatility and explosiveness.
8) Long term longevity and durability.
9) Environmental recyclability.

The good news for Toyota Motor Corp and the whole world is that superior battery chemistries are on the horizon...
peteharvey is offline  
Old 04-05-24, 10:11 AM
  #45  
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 20,673
Received 3,060 Likes on 2,572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
the EV market needs a battery, cost, or charging/availability breakthrough to go from 'early adopter' phase to 'mainstream'. when camry/rav4/f150 buyers decide to buy ev's instead, it's happened.
Very rarely does technology take an instant leap instead things iterate. Which is exactly what we're seeing with battery tech and EV's since the Model S was released batteries now have higher density, way cheaper and charge faster. This curve will continue for at least another 10 years.
LeX2K is offline  


Quick Reply: What do you think about Toyota's strategy to move models to hybrid only?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM.