What do you think about Toyota's strategy to move models to hybrid only?
#61
Work such as this that could double BEV range would be useful
https://scitechdaily.com/stanford-li...tric-vehicles/
But even then, I have a feeling a sizeable chunk of the public will still resist it, perhaps because of political ideology, tech anxiety, or other reasons. Thus, hybrids will be with us for a long time still.
https://scitechdaily.com/stanford-li...tric-vehicles/
But even then, I have a feeling a sizeable chunk of the public will still resist it, perhaps because of political ideology, tech anxiety, or other reasons. Thus, hybrids will be with us for a long time still.
The answer is alternative chemistry batteries.
It depends how good the new alternative battery chemistries are.
If the first batch of alternative chemistry batteries aren't that great, then TMC hybrids will continue to sell well as a stop gap.
However, if the alternative chemistry batteries are a genuine hit, then EV sales will spike, and the mainstream market will transition to EV's.
Last edited by peteharvey; 04-07-24 at 11:21 AM.
#62
Lexus Fanatic
if everyone could just agree that gasoline, gasoline hybrid, diesel, diesel, hybrid, battery electric, and hydrogen fuel cells, could all coexist and live together eventually, you’d get to net zero industry with hydrogen being the end solution. Different solutions for different markets until then
Spoiler
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 04-07-24 at 01:14 PM.
#63
Lexus Fanatic
I don't think all of those technologies can or will coexist. The infrastructure for Hydrogen vs EV for instance is totally different...I agree that gas and hybrid and EV will coexist for a long, long time to come but hydrogen isn't going to be the solution.
#65
Lexus Fanatic
Who said for the rest of humanity? There is no "endgame solution"...new technologies will come along, might we see Hydrogen cars en masse 100 years from now? Sure but in our lifetimes EV has too big a head start to make that feasible.
#66
Lexus Fanatic
‘common sense. America can be energy self sufficient with either gasoline or hydrogen. Eventually Tesla will build hydrogen cars. Relying on lithium and mining from a country on the other side of the world sets America backwards.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 04-07-24 at 01:59 PM.
#68
Lexus Fanatic
think about this. America, Canada, I think, Russia, and maybe a country or two in Europe can be self-sufficient on a number of factors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and energy. Why would you want to rely on on a mined resource from the other side of the world for your energy of cars? That sets America backwards. China is not a self-sufficient country. Hydrogen will absolutely win as it will become a national security risk
#69
Lexus Fanatic
I understand that viewpoint, but that doesn't mean that all of a sudden people are going to reverse course on all of the investments made in EVs and EV architecture and chase another technology from scratch.
#70
Lexus Fanatic
look at the Vinfast models sitting on the lot near me. I took this today. (But a waiting list for a Toyota hybrid)
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 04-07-24 at 02:28 PM. Reason: Fa
#71
Lexus Fanatic
Theres a difference between delaying EVs for Hybrids and trying to adopt yet another powertrain design requiring extensive nationwide architecture which doesn't exist.
#72
Lexus Fanatic
a proper electrical grid that can support 15-17 million new electric vehicles in the USA doesn’t exist either.
#73
However, solutions can be found with alternative chemistry battery breakthroughs - which surely will come in the next decade.
#75
Lexus Fanatic
but why would America want to rely on a resource from outside of North America? Like I said, the United States is a self-sufficient country. Taking away your energy independence, is backwards when it comes to national security either do it with gasoline or do it with it hydrogen gas.
The American and British and Canadian gas companies will convert if you force them to
There is NO hydrogen infrastructure at all.