Another sedan biting the dust.
#107
Excellent points, pete. I agree with virtually all of them...and the numbers do tell the story.
One of the reasons (but not the only one) that crossovers are so popular today is they provide the higher roofline and more interior headroom that sedans used to, but don't any more.
One of the reasons (but not the only one) that crossovers are so popular today is they provide the higher roofline and more interior headroom that sedans used to, but don't any more.
A number of vehicles especially the current 2017-24 Camry, 2018-25 7ES, 5LS and I'm pretty sure the JDM Toyota Crown sedans - all lowered the rooflines, lowered the waistline and lowered the hip position too.
The backrests and seat squabs are now more angled from the manufacturer's diagrams below.
Thankfully, it hasn't been done on standard Benz C/E/S Class, nor standard Beamer 3/5/7 Series, but I'm quite sure the Benz AMG GT 5-door Gran Coupe, and the 4 and 8 Series 4-door gran coupes - will be affected likewise.
Not just rooflines, waistlines and seating positions, but also tiny trunk openings, firm suspension and elastic band tires - all collectively drive consumers to high riding vehicles with wagen tailgates.
I drove an RZ and it has poor range and a plain FWD-based chassis, but it was so smooth riding with excellent sound insulation - unlike the NX with similar exterior dimensions.
Exaggerating to the extreme...
Last edited by peteharvey; 05-03-24 at 12:28 AM.
#109
#110
Based on the 1991-98 Corolla sedan, the 1992-98 Toyota Corolla Ceres sporty hardtop with lowered roofline, lowered waistline, lowered driving position, frameless windows, cozy interior and sports suspension is >30 years old - but it looks like it just fell out of the Space Shuttle...
#112
Below, these three Benzes are based on the same platform with the 2016-23 W213: E Class, CLS and AMG GT 5-door gran coupe.
All three are essentially sedans, but that's where the similarities end...
The AMG GT gran coupe has a fractionally longer wheelbase than the former two.
Thus, there is good reason as to why manufacturers go to all the trouble of making multiple variations of their sedans.
Hence, we can't just turn a blind eye and sweep it under the carpet.
They do have a term, and it is 4-door coupe or gran coupe.
Back in the 1980's, Mazda called theirs a "Hardtop", despite adding a B-pillar.
4-door gran coupes sells in niche numbers.
Hence, the demise of sporty 4-door gran coupes, more so than mainstream sedans.
It's not just the swoopy styling, low roofline, low waistline, low seating position, lower ground clearance, for a lower Center of Gravity to minimise roll to mimimize weight transfer to the outside wheels to maximize grip - nor the shorter overhangs to minimise Polar Moment of Inertia to maximize the speed of change of direction - all at the cost of interior space.
It is also the tiny trunk openings to maximize torsional rigidity & bending stiffness, the front mid-engine layout behind the front axle to maximize near 50/50 weight distribution to maximize grip albeit compromizing the cabin length, plus the firm suspension to minimise weight transfer to maximize grip, and the rubber band tires to minimise flex to speed-up steering response - with both firm suspension & rubber band tires coming at the cost of ride & quietness.
On the 31st of Agust last year, after only 5 years on the market, the 3rd gen CLS was axed.
They say that two is company, but three is a crowd...
All three are essentially sedans, but that's where the similarities end...
The AMG GT gran coupe has a fractionally longer wheelbase than the former two.
Thus, there is good reason as to why manufacturers go to all the trouble of making multiple variations of their sedans.
Hence, we can't just turn a blind eye and sweep it under the carpet.
They do have a term, and it is 4-door coupe or gran coupe.
Back in the 1980's, Mazda called theirs a "Hardtop", despite adding a B-pillar.
4-door gran coupes sells in niche numbers.
Hence, the demise of sporty 4-door gran coupes, more so than mainstream sedans.
It's not just the swoopy styling, low roofline, low waistline, low seating position, lower ground clearance, for a lower Center of Gravity to minimise roll to mimimize weight transfer to the outside wheels to maximize grip - nor the shorter overhangs to minimise Polar Moment of Inertia to maximize the speed of change of direction - all at the cost of interior space.
It is also the tiny trunk openings to maximize torsional rigidity & bending stiffness, the front mid-engine layout behind the front axle to maximize near 50/50 weight distribution to maximize grip albeit compromizing the cabin length, plus the firm suspension to minimise weight transfer to maximize grip, and the rubber band tires to minimise flex to speed-up steering response - with both firm suspension & rubber band tires coming at the cost of ride & quietness.
On the 31st of Agust last year, after only 5 years on the market, the 3rd gen CLS was axed.
They say that two is company, but three is a crowd...
Last edited by peteharvey; 05-03-24 at 03:36 AM.
#113
But making the connection between that styling driving low sales is difficult given which "traditional" sedans have remained fully upright and boxy and which have gone a little bit more swoopy.
Toyota: Avalon stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Camry continues.
Chevrolet: Impala stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Incredibly inferior but curvy Malibu remains
Subaru: Perhaps the boxiest sedan of all discontinued due to poor sales.
Ford: Taurus sales dropped 90% when it went from the last curvy model (6th gen?) to the big, squared off version (which spent 2 years as the Five Hundred). First sedan Ford cancelled.
Buick: Brand comprised almost entirely of traditional sedans essentially dissolved and reborn as SUV-only.
The overall market for sedans has shrunk dramatically. Automakers are doing all they can to save what they can, or just exiting the market altogether.
Toyota: Avalon stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Camry continues.
Chevrolet: Impala stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Incredibly inferior but curvy Malibu remains
Subaru: Perhaps the boxiest sedan of all discontinued due to poor sales.
Ford: Taurus sales dropped 90% when it went from the last curvy model (6th gen?) to the big, squared off version (which spent 2 years as the Five Hundred). First sedan Ford cancelled.
Buick: Brand comprised almost entirely of traditional sedans essentially dissolved and reborn as SUV-only.
The overall market for sedans has shrunk dramatically. Automakers are doing all they can to save what they can, or just exiting the market altogether.
#114
But making the connection between that styling driving low sales is difficult given which "traditional" sedans have remained fully upright and boxy and which have gone a little bit more swoopy.
Toyota: Avalon stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Camry continues.
Chevrolet: Impala stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Incredibly inferior but curvy Malibu remains
Subaru: Perhaps the boxiest sedan of all discontinued due to poor sales.
Ford: Taurus sales dropped 90% when it went from the last curvy model (6th gen?) to the big, squared off version (which spent 2 years as the Five Hundred). First sedan Ford cancelled.
Buick: Brand comprised almost entirely of traditional sedans essentially dissolved and reborn as SUV-only.
The overall market for sedans has shrunk dramatically. Automakers are doing all they can to save what they can, or just exiting the market altogether.
Toyota: Avalon stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Camry continues.
Chevrolet: Impala stayed squared off, discontinued due to poor sales. Incredibly inferior but curvy Malibu remains
Subaru: Perhaps the boxiest sedan of all discontinued due to poor sales.
Ford: Taurus sales dropped 90% when it went from the last curvy model (6th gen?) to the big, squared off version (which spent 2 years as the Five Hundred). First sedan Ford cancelled.
Buick: Brand comprised almost entirely of traditional sedans essentially dissolved and reborn as SUV-only.
The overall market for sedans has shrunk dramatically. Automakers are doing all they can to save what they can, or just exiting the market altogether.
#115
Eg, the 5LS used its massive wheelbase for a front mid-engine layout for nearer 50/50 weight distribution to maximize handling - at the expense of cabin length and rear legroom.
I've spent thousands retrofitting softer midlife refresh suspension spec, downsizing to 18", and now possibly downsizing further to 17" on my 4GS RWD.
Below are original 2013 4GS RWD front coils vs 2016-20 midlife refresh which partially returned to being slightly softer and fractionally quieter vehicle.
The mid-life refresh has a 1" taller unsprung axial height, because it is a softer spring rate to provide the same sprung vehicle ride height.
If the softer spring rate had the same unsprung axial height, then when sprung, it would have a lower ride height, and as we know, 4GS and 4.5GS midlife refresh has the exact same ride height.
4GS AWD and 450h hybrids have their own springing and damping rates and were said to be softer than RWD versions.
A costly exercise retrofitting suspension spec for a softer ride.
You think you'll get a softer ride trading-in for a brand new 2024 7ES?
You'll be surprized how firmly sprung and firmly damped the 2024 7ES is!
7ES also has "pinched tail" styling with a smaller and shallower trunk.
Hence, the booming popularity of high riding vehicles with wagen tailgates...
Last edited by peteharvey; 05-03-24 at 09:57 AM.
#116
Where is the Avalon? The Impala? The Taurus? the entire Buick lineup? All were exactly what you suggest the market really wants. All gone because no one actually did want them. Just like the Legacy.
I'm not a sedan hater by any stretch. That's all I've owned for a quarter century without exception, so you might say I'm a bit of a fan. But I can recognize that my preferences are not the predominant ones anymore. That's why I waited 8 months to buy the last RWD, manual transmission sedan that will ever be made by anyone.
#117
IMO, people didn't like sedans anymore because many models became too sporty.
Eg, the 5LS used its massive wheelbase for a front mid-engine layout for nearer 50/50 weight distribution to maximize handling - at the expense of cabin length and rear legroom.
I've spent thousands retrofitting softer midlife refresh suspension spec, downsizing to 18", and now possibly downsizing further to 17" on my 4GS RWD.
Below are original 2013 4GS RWD front coils vs 2016-20 midlife refresh which partially returned to being slightly softer and fractionally quieter vehicle.
The mid-life refresh has a 1" taller unsprung axial height, because it is a softer spring rate to provide the same sprung vehicle ride height.
If the softer spring rate had the same unsprung axial height, then when sprung, it would have a lower ride height, and as we know, 4GS and 4.5GS midlife refresh has the exact same ride height.
4GS AWD and 450h hybrids have their own springing and damping rates and were said to be softer than RWD versions.
A costly exercise retrofitting suspension spec for a softer ride.
You think you'll get a softer ride trading-in for a brand new 2024 7ES?
You'll be surprized how firmly sprung and firmly damped the 2024 7ES is!
7ES also has "pinched tail" styling with a smaller and shallower trunk.
Hence, the booming popularity of high riding vehicles with wagen tailgates...
Eg, the 5LS used its massive wheelbase for a front mid-engine layout for nearer 50/50 weight distribution to maximize handling - at the expense of cabin length and rear legroom.
I've spent thousands retrofitting softer midlife refresh suspension spec, downsizing to 18", and now possibly downsizing further to 17" on my 4GS RWD.
Below are original 2013 4GS RWD front coils vs 2016-20 midlife refresh which partially returned to being slightly softer and fractionally quieter vehicle.
The mid-life refresh has a 1" taller unsprung axial height, because it is a softer spring rate to provide the same sprung vehicle ride height.
If the softer spring rate had the same unsprung axial height, then when sprung, it would have a lower ride height, and as we know, 4GS and 4.5GS midlife refresh has the exact same ride height.
4GS AWD and 450h hybrids have their own springing and damping rates and were said to be softer than RWD versions.
A costly exercise retrofitting suspension spec for a softer ride.
You think you'll get a softer ride trading-in for a brand new 2024 7ES?
You'll be surprized how firmly sprung and firmly damped the 2024 7ES is!
7ES also has "pinched tail" styling with a smaller and shallower trunk.
Hence, the booming popularity of high riding vehicles with wagen tailgates...
#118
Carmakers don't make products people don't want. If the market were saying sedans are too sporty, manufacturers would have reversed course there. Reality is, the mainstream consumer overwhelmingly has been abandoning sedans for 20 years, and carmakers are adapting sedans to have a selling proposition beyond comfort, because the consumer who wants comfort and practicality buys crossovers
#119
The GS didn't die because it was too "sporty" it was because it no longer made sense for a shrinking market of buyers when the ES was right across the showroom for $15K less and more spacious to boot. Softening the suspension did nothing to change the cause of its demise. The only way to have saved the GS was to kill the ES, which Lexus would never risk.
#120
The GS didn't die because it was too "sporty" it was because it no longer made sense for a shrinking market of buyers when the ES was right across the showroom for $15K less and more spacious to boot. Softening the suspension did nothing to change the cause of its demise. The only way to have saved the GS was to kill the ES, which Lexus would never risk.