Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

So Three-Cylinder Engines are Dogs, are They?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-24, 01:55 PM
  #91  
LH1
Instructor
 
LH1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,016
Received 189 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Lol oh I love saying "I have a 350" in my LX. Or "there's a 350 in there."
Not anymore. You have to start saying "I have a 345.6" or "there's a 345.6 in there."

You need to re-badge your LX to say LX5663. I'd hate for anyone in Tennessee to be confused that you're driving an LX570 lol.
LH1 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 02:03 PM
  #92  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,926
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LH1
Not anymore. You have to start saying "I have a 345.6" or "there's a 345.6 in there."

You need to re-badge your LX to say LX5663. I'd hate for anyone in Tennessee to be confused that you're driving an LX570 lol.
This is the problem with not using the metric system and looking at inches. The Toyota 5.7 is 5663cc which is an exact measurement it is also 5663 millilitre, converted to imperial is exactly 345.6 just like you said. But what is .6 of an inch?

A true 350 engine is 5735cc. I believe Chevrolet has a true 350 V8 also 5.7 litres but not the same size as Toyota's 5.7 which is actually smaller at 346

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 07-06-24 at 02:26 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 02:05 PM
  #93  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,811
Received 94 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

We didn't win WW2 just to use made up Euro numbers.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 02:09 PM
  #94  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,926
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrankReynoldsCPA
We didn't win WW2 just to use made up Euro numbers.
The US Military actually uses the metric system. (with some rare omissions in some segments). WW2 US used the metric system for Army ground forces.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 07-06-24 at 02:25 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 02:34 PM
  #95  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,953
Received 1,194 Likes on 887 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrankReynoldsCPA
We didn't win WW2 just to use made up Euro numbers.
Damn right! I have me a 383 W12
Striker223 is online now  
Old 07-06-24, 02:38 PM
  #96  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,921
Received 2,720 Likes on 1,948 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrankReynoldsCPA
We didn't win WW2 just to use made up Euro numbers.
LOL, exactly.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 03:33 PM
  #97  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,212
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Huh? 56xx cubic centimeters in the 3UR equates to 5.7 liters. They always round up. If it were 54xx it wouldn't be a true 5.7 liter.
AJT123 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 04:08 PM
  #98  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,811
Received 94 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
Damn right! I have me a 383 W12
The irony is that our cars were made by companies that have uh..... unflattering histories in that war.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 04:57 PM
  #99  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,998
Received 239 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LH1
I've used the 2L bottle of soda analogy to visualize an engine's displacement. Doesn't everyone do that?

Liter is the only metric measurement that gained mass market/widespread adoption in the US.
i probably first saw that done by clarkson to visualize the evo 8 engine size haha... except he was holding a 2.3 liter 'litre' carton of milk


Stroock639 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 05:06 PM
  #100  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,212
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

All I know is 5.7 liters is a very healthy size and a pretty large V8.
AJT123 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 05:08 PM
  #101  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,998
Received 239 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrankReynoldsCPA
I've never owned a 4 cylinder, NA or turbo.

I've had:
2.8 V6 - total dog
4.0 V8 - eh, okay at 250 hp. Great highway cruiser, but not a torque monster.
3.0 V6 - sufficient
5.0 V8 - beast and a screamer. Love it.
3.0 I6 - first turbo and it's amazing.
you really owe it to yourself to drive one of the 1998-2000 LS or GS 400s with the updated 300hp 1UZ, totally different animal to the original version and impressively punchy for its size (and age at this point) with a significantly broader power curve... although now that you're used to a B58 it may no longer feel quite as torquey haha

now the 4.6 in my crown vic THAT was a total dog, ford should be ashamed for selling such an engine into the 2010s
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 06:01 PM
  #102  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
you really owe it to yourself to drive one of the 1998-2000 LS or GS 400s with the updated 300hp 1UZ, totally different animal to the original version and impressively punchy for its size (and age at this point) with a significantly broader power curve... although now that you're used to a B58 it may no longer feel quite as torquey haha

now the 4.6 in my crown vic THAT was a total dog, ford should be ashamed for selling such an engine into the 2010s
If you remember, Ford put that engine in the 2003/2004 Mercury Marauder. I test-drove one, and, yes, I agree..it was no match for the 5.7L Impala SS.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 06:17 PM
  #103  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,998
Received 239 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
If you remember, Ford put that engine in the 2003/2004 Mercury Marauder. I test-drove one, and, yes, I agree..it was no match for the 5.7L Impala SS.
the version in the marauder is at least DOHC and has other minor upgrades here and there (essentially the mustang GT engine i think), the crown vic only ever had the basic 2 valve modular engine which made very little power or torque at any rpm... sure drank gas like it did though lol
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 07-06-24, 11:09 PM
  #104  
bkowa092
Driver
 
bkowa092's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: pa
Posts: 74
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Chevy still making vehicles with 155hp, LOL.
bkowa092 is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 06:17 AM
  #105  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bkowa092
Chevy still making vehicles with 155hp, LOL.

I have that engine in my Encore GX, and it has enough torque for all my normal driving needs, even with AWD. I get up to 50 MPG cruising on the highway at moderate speeds, even though it's EPA-rated much lower than that. And the torque speak is at a very low 1500-1700 RPM, so there is enough power to easily get you rolling from a stop. The engine's only flaw is a tendency to have more vibrations at low speeds than those with more cylinders, but even that is managed pretty well with Buick's well-known Quiet Tuning system, I'd buy another one in a heartbeat....at least if I wasn't going to keep it 200,000 miles.
mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: So Three-Cylinder Engines are Dogs, are They?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 AM.