Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

So Three-Cylinder Engines are Dogs, are They?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-24, 03:58 PM
  #121  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
I believe you when you say your Encore GX gets 50MPG on the highway. 21MPG over the EPA estimate

Typically 40-45, sometimes 50. I can't fully explain it either. Either the EPA did not do their highway test properly, or they did it under much different conditions than I had on I-95 and 66. Or the trip/fuel-computer is not reading properly, except that my brother got more or less similar results with his Seltos (40-45), considering it has a slightly larger engine.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 04:08 PM
  #122  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,921
Received 2,720 Likes on 1,948 Posts
Default

So now it’s 40-45 not 50 lol.

You clearly mean 30-35, even that would be a stretch.

Sorry Mike, it doesn’t get double the EPA estimated mileage in your hands lol. My cars always beat the EPA estimates too…by 10%…15%…20%…not 80%. I think you’re probably looking at the instant economy and you see 45 and 50 when it’s under very light load but it’s not actually averaging anything close to that.

Last edited by SW17LS; 07-07-24 at 04:12 PM.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 04:43 PM
  #123  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,811
Received 94 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
So now it’s 40-45 not 50 lol.

You clearly mean 30-35, even that would be a stretch.

Sorry Mike, it doesn’t get double the EPA estimated mileage in your hands lol. My cars always beat the EPA estimates too…by 10%…15%…20%…not 80%. I think you’re probably looking at the instant economy and you see 45 and 50 when it’s under very light load but it’s not actually averaging anything close to that.
It seems to me he's resetting the meter while cruising in ideal conditions and using that number before it drops.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 05:16 PM
  #124  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,953
Received 1,194 Likes on 887 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
you're trading in the audi for a for a buick gx?
No lol! My old TDI is gonna be my daily back and forth car, my wife uses the LS or SUV depending on what she needs or if I need to haul something. The Audis are driven whenever and wherever I'm not working or after I'm home from work....and sometimes if I have a day not involving a lot of dirt. It's hard not to drive them
Striker223 is online now  
Old 07-07-24, 05:45 PM
  #125  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
So now it’s 40-45 not 50 lol.
40-45 on slight hilly Interstates.....50 or so on flat level stretches.

You clearly mean 30-35, even that would be a stretch.
No, I do NOT mean 30-35. I meant exactly what I said.

Sorry Mike, it doesn’t get double the EPA estimated mileage in your hands lol. My cars always beat the EPA estimates too…by 10%…15%…20%…not 80%. I think you’re probably looking at the instant economy and you see 45 and 50 when it’s under very light load but it’s not actually averaging anything close to that.
OK, you're always chiding me for telling you things that you say you know....you are doing exactly the same thing with me. I know the difference between the instant-MPG meter and trip/accumulated MPG.

There's only way you are going to see for yourself...I'll have to take a camera-shot of the gauges myself and post it. I'll do that the next time I'm on I-95.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 06:06 PM
  #126  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,921
Received 2,720 Likes on 1,948 Posts
Default

Yeah no. No way you’re getting 50 MPG sustained in an Encore GX.

Im sure you can get the gauge to read 50, but not after 100 miles of driving on the highway. You’re resetting the fuel economy measure and reading it before it has enough data to actually make an average. No car overperforms its EPA estimates by 80%.

I can get my car to say it’s getting 38 MPG on the highway the same way. It doesn’t get 38.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 06:08 PM
  #127  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Yeah no. No way you’re getting 50 MPG sustained in an Encore GX.

Im sure you can get the gauge to read 50, but not after 100 miles of driving on the highway. You’re resetting the fuel economy measure and reading it before it has enough data to actually make an average.

I can get my car to say it’s getting 38 MPG on the highway the same way. It doesn’t get 38.

Like I said, I'll post it myself. No need to keep arguing here.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 06:34 PM
  #128  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,926
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Typically 40-45, sometimes 50. I can't fully explain it either. Either the EPA did not do their highway test properly, or they did it under much different conditions than I had on I-95 and 66. Or the trip/fuel-computer is not reading properly, except that my brother got more or less similar results with his Seltos (40-45), considering it has a slightly larger engine.
I get 40 mpg in my 4Runner. Rated for 19 hwy.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 07-07-24 at 06:38 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 08:20 PM
  #129  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,953
Received 1,194 Likes on 887 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
I get 40 mpg in my 4Runner. Rated for 19 hwy.
There is no way in hell you can get 40 in a 4Runner, the best I have ever gotten in any of my cars was 32.3 in the LS460 on a 600 mile trip. There is zero change an SUV with totally inferior MPG related optimizations can somehow beat a car like that.
Striker223 is online now  
Old 07-07-24, 08:59 PM
  #130  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,921
Received 2,720 Likes on 1,948 Posts
Default

Methinks its a funny...
SW17LS is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 09:58 PM
  #131  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
There is no way in hell you can get 40 in a 4Runner,
Highly doubtful unless it is coasting down a long hill. ....the 4Runner is essentially a truck, not a relatively light crossover.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-07-24, 10:35 PM
  #132  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,811
Received 94 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Yeah, there's absolutely no way anybody is getting 40 MPG in any 4Runner.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-08-24, 01:13 AM
  #133  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,998
Received 239 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
40-45 on slight hilly Interstates.....50 or so on flat level stretches.
well i just wanna say i do believe you mike, i'm pretty good at hypermiling when i want to be and i've well exceeded the official mpg estimates by a significant amount on a multitude of cars... however to truly get the best possible mpgs it generally involves either: completely holding everyone up with painfully slow acceleration and speeds, and/or avoiding touching the brake pedal by ANY means necessary

these are from drives i've made in a corolla le and standard prius (both from around 2016)... the mpg number in the corolla is from roughly 10 straight minutes on the highway after already getting up to about 60 mph, and the prius was an entire 28 mile journey from start to finish including local and highway driving




the windows were up and the a/c off for both drives so i was basically miserable the whole time haha, real world practical numbers wouldn't be this good but it can be done... after that prius drive especially i was exhausted, getting seriously good mpgs is very hard work
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 07-08-24, 04:05 AM
  #134  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,926
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default




I got 784 MPG this morning.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 07-08-24 at 05:59 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 07-08-24, 04:59 AM
  #135  
patgilm
Lead Lap
 
patgilm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,035
Received 285 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
well i just wanna say i do believe you mike, i'm pretty good at hypermiling when i want to be and i've well exceeded the official mpg estimates by a significant amount on a multitude of cars... however to truly get the best possible mpgs it generally involves either: completely holding everyone up with painfully slow acceleration and speeds, and/or avoiding touching the brake pedal by ANY means necessary

these are from drives i've made in a corolla le and standard prius (both from around 2016)... the mpg number in the corolla is from roughly 10 straight minutes on the highway after already getting up to about 60 mph, and the prius was an entire 28 mile journey from start to finish including local and highway driving.

the windows were up and the a/c off for both drives so i was basically miserable the whole time haha, real world practical numbers wouldn't be this good but it can be done... after that prius drive especially i was exhausted, getting seriously good mpgs is very hard work
This example is for a short trip though, have you sustained that mpg for a full tank or an average? Anyone could hyper mile a short distance and claim way higher than EPA estimates but that is completely misleading unless you can sustain that.

So in your case or Mike’s case would you be ok with EPA setting the mpg that way? I would bet most people wouldn’t.
patgilm is online now  


Quick Reply: So Three-Cylinder Engines are Dogs, are They?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM.