Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Should the Design of Automatic Transmission-Shifters in New Vehicles be Standardized?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-24, 08:33 AM
  #16  
KennyFSU
Instructor
 
KennyFSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: FL
Posts: 845
Received 321 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

No, I think the less government regulations/involvement, the better.
KennyFSU is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 09:38 AM
  #17  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,919
Received 1,190 Likes on 885 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KennyFSU
No, I think the less government regulations/involvement, the better.
You reminded me I never answered the question lol!

I agree, feds can back off.
Striker223 is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 10:14 AM
  #18  
KevinGS
Pole Position
 
KevinGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,378
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

No, there should be no standardization. If you don't like the design of the shifter, don't buy that car.
KevinGS is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 10:31 AM
  #19  
Margate330
Lexus Test Driver
 
Margate330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 6,892
Received 965 Likes on 770 Posts
Default

I had no idea all these new kinds of shifters existed.
I'm getting schooled. Lol
Margate330 is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 11:17 AM
  #20  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,069
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Margate330
I had no idea all these new kinds of shifters existed.
I'm getting schooled. Lol

Go out and do some test-drives (or look at some video-reviews) and you will see for yourself.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 11:21 AM
  #21  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,069
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Personally, I like the separate Park button better. You are more likely to accidentally shift into park than you are to accidentally press the park button. Especially in cars where the "P" button is on the console, and not on the shift lever.

In general, with a lever, I'll agree it's better to have the Park button on the console than on the lever itself. Problem is, though, that can also be a bad design if all of the shift buttons are on the console with it....like we see on some GM and Honda designs.

Last edited by mmarshall; 06-24-24 at 11:39 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 11:22 AM
  #22  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,062
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In general, with a lever, I'll agree it's better to have the Park button on the console than on the lever itself. Problem is, though, that tan also be a bad design if all of the shift buttons are on the console with it....like we see on some GM and Honda designs.
The rows of buttons are just bad design all around; you have to look down no matter what gear you are selecting. On both my BMWs, with the "joystick" style and toggle, it's by feel only, no problem.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 11:49 AM
  #23  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,807
Received 94 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

The BWM monoshifter(I guess that's what these are called?) works very well. Push it forward for reverse, pull it back for drive. Push the button for park. Slap it to the side for sport mode and for manual shifting if you don't want to use the paddle shifters I guess. I've had zero complaints, though it is a learning moment for family members who have never driven a BMW before. I have never pushed P by accident, and I suspect the car won't let it do anything unless you're stopped.


FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 06-24-24, 12:08 PM
  #24  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,849
Received 2,718 Likes on 1,946 Posts
Default

Absolutely there should be standardization
SW17LS is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 02:04 AM
  #25  
TriC
Racer
 
TriC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,542
Received 266 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
The rows of buttons are just bad design all around; you have to look down no matter what gear you are selecting.
Agreed! My Ridgeline has buttons on the console that take up every bit as much space as a conventional shifter. The reverse button is unique so there's some saving grace there.

One thing that is nice is that regardless of what gear it is in, it automatically shifts to park when the engine is turned off.
TriC is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 06:04 AM
  #26  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,626
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Absolutely there should be standardization
it's not possible with such a diverse range of 'em already.

you're going to force tesla to put a shifter into their cars?
or force some econobox manufacturer to put some other mechanism in?
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 06:06 AM
  #27  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,626
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

my ioniq is the first car i've driven that finally 'make sense' to me.
ALL other shifters i've used, from neutral for example, have you press FORWARD to go BACKWARDS (reverse) and BACKWARD to go FORWARDS (drive)

the ioniq 5 has a stalk shifter you twist the stalk FORWARD to go FORWARD and BACKWARD to go BACKWARD.

even on dinosaur shifters, why should we shift through reverse to get to drive? so why isn't it PDNRL?

bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 06:52 AM
  #28  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,069
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna

even on dinosaur shifters, why should we shift through reverse to get to drive? so why isn't it PDNRL?
Think about that one for a minute, bit......that would not make sense.

If you wanted to downshift from Drive, for instance, going down a hill, to reach Low, the shifter would actually move through the Neutral and Reverse positions for a second or two before reaching low, first jerking the transmission out of gear as it hits Neutral, and then Reverse for a split second, risking an even bigger jolt and damage to the transmission. Then, upshifting back to Drive from Low at the bottom of the hill, the same damaging process over again....in Reverse (no pun intended).

That is why it was standardized to PRNDL almost 60 years ago....with GM's PNDLR, drivers were accidentally going a little too far, into Reverse, when they wanted Low, and, of course...........good-bye transmission, or an accident.

That's why, when I opened this thread, I asked if the shifters themselves should be standardized, not the PRNDL sequence, which, in most cases, seems to work fine.

Last edited by mmarshall; 06-26-24 at 11:52 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 07:16 AM
  #29  
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Striker223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,919
Received 1,190 Likes on 885 Posts
Default

Most people don't use the shifter for low range anymore, they have paddles or the shifter slides over to a manual mode of some sort......

I don't disagree that forward for drive makes sense but you only see that on certain shift interfaces that are never a sequential shift. It's always a joystick of some sort for good reason imo.

If things are standardized it won't be "upwards" it will be lowest common denominator like all things .gov/communist so expect a base GM shifter in your 100k+ car
Striker223 is offline  
Old 06-25-24, 05:53 PM
  #30  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,849
Received 2,718 Likes on 1,946 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
it's not possible with such a diverse range of 'em already.

you're going to force tesla to put a shifter into their cars?
or force some econobox manufacturer to put some other mechanism in?
There should be general guidelines around how gears are selected, there is too much variation where there used to be more standardization.

Yes I think Teslas should have gear selectors and turn signal stalks.
SW17LS is offline  


Quick Reply: Should the Design of Automatic Transmission-Shifters in New Vehicles be Standardized?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:46 AM.