Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Dead Sedan Announcements Thread (now the merits of CUV/SUV's vs sedans thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-24 | 12:23 PM
  #61  
jwong77's Avatar
jwong77
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 15
From: CA
Default

I wonder if this means the Skyline in Japan is dead as well.
Old 08-21-24 | 12:25 PM
  #62  
gor134's Avatar
gor134
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Ever since Carmaker1 reported on the cancellation of the FM platform successor development in 2018, it was obvious the Q50 wouldn't see any successor until a full EV replacement. Kinda sad of how the Q50 languished.

I was hoping Infiniti would at the very least give the Q50 a very heavy facelift like Lexus did with the 2021 IS, to keep it fresh but seems they can't afford to or have no incentive to.
Old 08-21-24 | 03:02 PM
  #63  
LH1's Avatar
LH1
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 200
From: PA
Default

Not shocked the Q50 is dead. Infiniti has a new QX80 and what else? Wouldn't be shocked if the brand is dead in a couple years.
Old 08-21-24 | 03:18 PM
  #64  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,144
Likes: 9
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
That ones a shame
Is it? It's been the same platform for 10 years.
Old 08-21-24 | 04:18 PM
  #65  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,138
Likes: 106
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Is it? It's been the same platform for 10 years.
10? More like 20. The Q50 is just the G35/G37 by another name and they've been on the FM platform for 20 years.
Old 08-21-24 | 05:03 PM
  #66  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,080
Likes: 61
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Is it? It's been the same platform for 10 years.
It is a shame in the sense that the Japanese have totally given up on the idea of a 4-door RWD platform that isn't a body on frame truck. Soon the aging IS and LS will also be on the chopping block.
Old 08-22-24 | 02:36 AM
  #67  
LH1's Avatar
LH1
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 200
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
It is a shame in the sense that the Japanese have totally given up on the idea of a 4-door RWD platform that isn't a body on frame truck. Soon the aging IS and LS will also be on the chopping block.
LS will be axed first. IS may live on a bit longer.
Old 08-22-24 | 03:47 AM
  #68  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,466
Likes: 2,546
From: Present
Default

if lexus axes the LS i think the brand itself will suffer.
Old 08-22-24 | 04:08 AM
  #69  
LH1's Avatar
LH1
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 200
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
if lexus axes the LS i think the brand itself will suffer.
Not having a flagship luxury sedan could be damaging but LS sales are so terrible. 1,370 sold as of July. On this trajectory they may not even crack 2,000 this year. I'm guessing 2025 may be the final year for the LS?








Old 08-22-24 | 05:15 AM
  #70  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,466
Likes: 2,546
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by LH1
Not having a flagship luxury sedan could be damaging but LS sales are so terrible. 1,370 sold as of July. On this trajectory they may not even crack 2,000 this year. I'm guessing 2025 may be the final year for the LS?
just because it's bad now doesn't mean it couldn't be better. could even mean they make the ls more 'suv'-like (heresy i know ).
Old 08-22-24 | 05:48 AM
  #71  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,372
Likes: 488
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by LH1
Not having a flagship luxury sedan could be damaging but LS sales are so terrible. 1,370 sold as of July. On this trajectory they may not even crack 2,000 this year. I'm guessing 2025 may be the final year for the LS?
5LS did not sell poorly because it's a sedan.
5LS sold poorly because it was too sporty..
Nowadays, 5LS is also selling poorly because it's too long in the tooth.

Just as S Class sold 14k recently, an all new 6LS would have sold better than recent S Class, because traditionally, all new LS's have outsold all new S Class equivalents.

https://carfigures.com/us-market-brand/mercedes-benz/s-class


Last edited by peteharvey; 08-22-24 at 05:53 AM.
Old 08-22-24 | 05:53 AM
  #72  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,129
Likes: 328
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by peteharvey
5LS sold poorly because it was too sporty...
...and too small inside. Despite only being available in a LWB model, it's dramatically less roomy than the smaller ES. It's the first flagship sedan I've ever sat in where I've felt cramped.
Old 08-22-24 | 10:27 AM
  #73  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,666
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

It is pretty obvious that consumers are wanting crossovers. Sedans really are a hard sell in the modern era The lack of a flagship sedan really is irrelevant now as the younger generation have grown up now with crossovers. Smart to move on from them.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 08-22-24 at 10:31 AM.
Old 08-22-24 | 02:01 PM
  #74  
peteharvey's Avatar
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,372
Likes: 488
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
...and too small inside. Despite only being available in a LWB model, it's dramatically less roomy than the smaller ES. It's the first flagship sedan I've ever sat in where I've felt cramped.
Yes, pity they had to switch from 1-4LS's traditional RWD layout to the 5LS's front mid-engine layout for even nearer 50/50 weight distribution in the name of superior handling, which heavily compromized cabin length for SteveLS.







My 3GS which I passed onto my staff had lovely soft spring and damper rates for a record 33,500+ units sold on debut in USA.
Akio Toyoda was an avid racer at the Nurburgring with his friend the engineer Dr Ulrich Bez as former CEO of Aston Martin, who heavily brainwashed Akio into thinking that TMC products were "bland", so when Akio took over the reins of TMC in 2009, Akio vowed "No more boring cars".
Hence, my 2015 4GS RWD was so firm riding - though I admit that the 4GS RWD almost handled like a compact sedan!
The GS450h hybrid did have a softer ride, great bottom end torque and economy, and I was tempted but I could not accept the small trunk with no cabin pass through for long thin cargo.
I have never driven the AWD version, although normally AWD's are matched with more compliant suspension for superior traction in the snow.

At the midlife refresh, probably due to consumer feedback or whatever, the 4.5GS did an about face and softened the suspension and increased the sound insulation too.
Hence, my RWD with a very tiring ride, I had to retrofit 2016-2020 RWD coil springs and shock absorbers which were much softer - though still only medium soft, and not as genuinely soft as my old 3GS.
Hence, I also had to downsize twice: 1" into 18", and then another inch into 17" to get a decent ride.
Now, it rides so smoothly, I could drive all day and never get tired nor bored...

My advice to Koji Sato is to copy off Benz and Beamer and only fit sports suspension to their F Sport trims.
Meanwhile the Luxury trims should have appropriately softer suspension.
Please do NOT fit sports suspension standard across the range, because this will cause sales will suffer too.


Below, different suspension part numbers with different spring & damper rates used across the 4GS Series.




Below, notice how the 2015 RWD front coils have 1" shorter unsprung axial height than 2016-20 RWD front coils - yet the same ride height?
The longer the unsprung axial coil height, the softer the coil spring - given they are designed for the same ride height...




Below, OEM 235/40 R19:
Handles almost like a compact sedan, but a tiring ride.​​​​


Below, 1" downsized to 235/45 R18:
Intermediate all rounder.


Below, 2" downsized to 235/50 R17's:
Unfashionably tall side walled, but finally a beautiful ride.
Plus, fractionally quicker acceleration, fractionally better fuel economy, superior wet traction, and very cheap replacement tires.

Last edited by peteharvey; 08-23-24 at 05:03 PM.
Old 08-22-24 | 05:14 PM
  #75  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,080
Likes: 61
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by peteharvey
Yes, pity they had to switch from 1-4LS's traditional RWD layout to the 5LS's front mid-engine layout for even nearer 50/50 weight distribution in the name of superior handling, which heavily compromized cabin length for SteveLS.
Except the weight distribution is exactly the same as the 460L:





The only reason the LS500 had the long hood was so that it could accompany the (cancelled) TTV8. Essentially the vehicle we have from Lexus is a half-baked product that they gave up on in the middle of development because Akio has the product planning skills of an ADHD child, which is also why Toyota cancelled the GS without being able to engineer the ES to accompany an AWD system with the V6.


Quick Reply: Dead Sedan Announcements Thread (now the merits of CUV/SUV's vs sedans thread)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 PM.