When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Slightly torn here, because on the one hand what GM did absolutely deserves punishment but on the other Ken Paxton isn’t exactly a paragon of virtue and ought to be serving time himself.
Slightly torn here, because on the one hand what GM did absolutely deserves punishment but on the other Ken Paxton isn’t exactly a paragon of virtue and ought to be serving time himself.
Even a blind squirrel can find a nut I'm surprised no other AG has gone after GM for this
I'm surprised no other AG has gone after GM for this
Probably just not a strong enough case....there's evidence on both sides. It is true that corporations do not have an unlimited right to collect and sell personal driving data, but it is also just as true that driving is legally a privilege, not a Constitutional right, and drivers do not have an absolute right to unlimited privacy behind the wheel.
Probably just not a strong enough case....there's evidence on both sides. It is true that corporations do not have an unlimited right to collect and sell personal driving data, but it is also just as true that driving is legally a privilege, not a Constitutional right, and drivers do not have an absolute right to unlimited privacy behind the wheel.
This is about deceptively selling data. There aren't "both sides" to this. People suffered harm because, among other things, insurers were raising rates on drivers who did not know GM had sold them out.
Probably just not a strong enough case....there's evidence on both sides. It is true that corporations do not have an unlimited right to collect and sell personal driving data, but it is also just as true that driving is legally a privilege, not a Constitutional right, and drivers do not have an absolute right to unlimited privacy behind the wheel.
Freedom of travel is a right, as is speech....I don't see you hand writing letters? Tech changes and protections need to be extend to modern methods of doing things
Slightly torn here, because on the one hand what GM did absolutely deserves punishment but on the other Ken Paxton isn’t exactly a paragon of virtue and ought to be serving time himself.
Probably just not a strong enough case....there's evidence on both sides. It is true that corporations do not have an unlimited right to collect and sell personal driving data, but it is also just as true that driving is legally a privilege, not a Constitutional right, and drivers do not have an absolute right to unlimited privacy behind the wheel.
It's not a constitutional issue because the constitution protects you from government overreach, not from companies.
This could be a violation of consumer protection statutes, however.
I hope we ramp up consumer privacy protection x10 as a result of this.