Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

04' Sienna

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-04, 12:02 PM
  #31  
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
XeroK00L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by mmarshall
Well, the Chrysler Town and Country has sold quite well over the years, in spite of the fact that it is a premium nameplate and has both siblings Dodge Caravan and Chrysler Voyager in the lineup. The Voyager started out as a Plymouth and was tranferred to Chrysler when Plymouth bit the dust. The Town and Country always was a Chrysler, though...in in 2WD and AWD forms. Mercury is now marketing an upmarket version of the new Ford Freestar....the Monterrey. Oldsmobile sold an upmarket version of the Chevy Lumina APV....the Silhouette. With Olds' demise, Buick will now carry on with an upmarket minivan of its own...the 2005 Terraza. Sorry, folks....we're just going to have to agree to disagree here. I just don't buy the argument that upmarket minivans don't ( and won't ) sell. So...we'll just disagree and leave it at that.
Sorry to sound like continuing an argument here.

While I totally see your point, the thing is that, unlike DaimlerChrysler, GM and Ford, Toyota doesn't own a whole lot of brands. Chrysler, Oldsmobile and Mercury represent those manufacturer's respective entries to the mid-luxury market, while the Lexus brand was created only to pursue the higher-end luxury market. That's why we aren't seeing a Mercedes, a Cadilac, or a Jaguar minivan. So for Toyota, anything that doesn't convey a high-end image should fall into the Toyota branding territory.

Last edited by XeroK00L; 08-25-04 at 12:05 PM.
XeroK00L is offline  
Old 08-25-04, 12:28 PM
  #32  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,169
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally posted by XeroK00L
Sorry to sound like continuing an argument here.

While I totally see your point, the thing is that, unlike DaimlerChrysler, GM and Ford, Toyota doesn't own a whole lot of brands. Chrysler, Oldsmobile and Mercury represent those manufacturer's respective entries to the mid-luxury market, while the Lexus brand was created only to pursue the higher-end luxury market. That's why we aren't seeing a Mercedes, a Cadilac, or a Jaguar minivan. So for Toyota, anything that doesn't convey a high-end image should fall into the Toyota branding territory.
Ok...fair enough. As I said, we'll just leave it at that.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-25-04, 08:53 PM
  #33  
darden
Lexus Champion
 
darden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by XeroK00L
the Lexus brand was created only to pursue the higher-end luxury market. That's why we aren't seeing a Mercedes, a Cadilac, or a Jaguar minivan. So for Toyota, anything that doesn't convey a high-end image should fall into the Toyota branding territory.
i know the discussion has ended, but i just like to say that i agree with Xerokool and others who don't think lexus should make mini vans.

i simply cannot see a BMW, Mercedes, nor a Lexus minivan. the whole concept of the mini van just does not match the brand images.
darden is offline  
Old 08-26-04, 08:16 AM
  #34  
thisguy_06
Racer
 
thisguy_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,265
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Well when/if u do get the wheels on the van, be sure to post pictures because i've never seen wheels on a the current gen Sienna before.
thisguy_06 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wald GS
Car Chat
22
05-20-04 11:36 AM
ntran18
Great Deals
8
05-17-04 10:35 PM
Lexls400
Car Chat
17
11-01-03 07:11 PM
airahcaz
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
5
08-26-02 06:39 AM



Quick Reply: 04' Sienna



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 PM.