Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Self-Driving Vehicles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-15, 11:41 AM
  #226  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

i am thinking this will never happen, ever... 2-3 crashes could cost them more than what they make from US market, and they dont have to really be guilty in jury trial anyway.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-07-15, 11:55 AM
  #227  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,633
Received 2,373 Likes on 1,558 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
i am thinking this will never happen, ever... 2-3 crashes could cost them more than what they make from US market, and they dont have to really be guilty in jury trial anyway.
never happen? you mean they'll reverse what they've just said they'll do?
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 10-07-15, 01:59 PM
  #228  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
never happen? you mean they'll reverse what they've just said they'll do?
yes, i think they will not do what they said they will, at least not in this sense... remember, this tech is 4-5-6 years away from production vehicles.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-07-15, 02:24 PM
  #229  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,296
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

I remember that video. Wasn't that Volvo accident with a Volvo NOT equipped with pedestrian detection?
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-07-15, 03:49 PM
  #230  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I remember that video. Wasn't that Volvo accident with a Volvo NOT equipped with pedestrian detection?
yes, at least what Volvo said... but also these systems dont work at low speed under 10kmh. In any case, stupid to even do this.
spwolf is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 03:53 PM
  #231  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,296
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default CEO Embraces Responsibility, Presses Federal Governent For Consistency

Volvo chief executive officer and president Håkan Samuelsson says one of the most vexing challenges facing the auto industry can be solved with a simple statement: Manufacturers should be held responsible if their autonomous technology causes car accidents. Two days after the Swedish automaker pledged to be "fully liable" for accidents caused by its self-driving technology, Samuelsson pushed the entire industry to follow Volvo's lead.

"We are the suppliers of this technology and we are liable for everything the car is doing in autonomous mode," he said Thursday during an appearance in Washington DC. "If you are not ready to make such a statement, you shouldn't try to develop an autonomous system."

Google and Mercedes-Benz have made similar pledges, but it's not yet clear whether other automakers will follow. A spokesperson for the Auto Alliance, an industry trade group representing major OEMs says the organization has no position on whether the industry should be held liable.

But in the span of a few short days, the series of announcements from Volvo, Google, and Mercedes-Benz set a substantial precedent. Even though self-driving cars aren't yet on sale, the industry has been mulling questions over autonomous liability for some time, and no clear answers had emerged. Samuelsson said further inaction would hinder progress on commercial implementation of autonomobiles and stumped for federal guidance and regulation that would ready roads for deployment.

Details of Volvo's liability pledge are still being discussed, but the CEO said his plan was ultimately a simple one. Volvo would accept liability for all crashes caused by the self-driving technology. It would not include coverage for incidents that occurred when autonomous-capable cars were under human control, nor would it cover instances when a car operated in autonomous mode could not avoid the reckless actions of another vehicle.

"If the system is causing an accident or over-speeding because it didn't read a sign in the right way, that is what I mean," he said. "That is what should be included."

Signs might not even be needed in an autonomous future, a possibility raised during a panel discussion at the House of Sweden, where Samuelsson made the announcement. If that prospect struck some in the transportation community as far-fetched, it struck others as obvious, just as the notion that automakers should be held responsible for their products did.

"Why would Volvo accept liability for autonomous vehicles?" asked Alain Kornhauser, faculty chair of Princeton's Autonomous Vehicles Engineering program. "Because they know it's not going to cost them anything. They're going to make it safe. They're going to sell these suckers and make money off it, and insurance companies that see that will get rich off that."

More than 32,000 people are killed and 400,000 injured in car crashes every year in the United States. Automakers haven't said their autonomous technology will be perfect, but with human error responsible for 94 percent of accidents, they believe they can sharply improve on that toll. Embracing the liability may be a signal the technology is nearing readiness for deployment.

"Any corporation putting its name on something that will be driven without a driver is going to do that," said Ron Medford, director of safety for Google's self-driving car project. "Regulation is fine, and we support efforts being made to make sure the vehicle is safe. But the primary responsibility will be with the manufacturer, because it has to be."

Another sign autonomous deployment may be nearing: After testing cars on public roads for six years, Google recently hired auto-industry veteran John Krafcik as the first CEO of its self-driving car program. While technology may be ready, public policy still needs development and refinement. Samuelsson, pictured above, pressed both the industry and federal government to find ways to ensure laws and regulations are adopted and consistent across the United States. In Europe, he said a patchwork of varying laws may hamper the sale and functionality of autonomous vehicles crossing from one jurisdiction into the other. He said the US could adopt a lead role by avoiding such confusion here.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration officials say they're researching ways to create uniform testing practices and have initiated the process of rule-making for vehicle-to-vehicle communications, which could affect how self-driving cars interact in a broader traffic environment. The irony of an automaker calling for regulations and standards, which are often loathed by industry insiders, wasn't lost on NHTSA administrator Mark Rosekind.

"From where I sit, you can have all kinds of strong voices literally yelling at us – 'Don't regulate, you'll constrain innovation!' – and at the same time, President Samuelsson is saying you need some consistency across the board," he said.
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/10/09/v...car-liability/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-29-15, 04:33 AM
  #232  
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver

 
JessePS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: QC/FRANCE
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bloomberg: Can Detroit Beat Google to the Self-Driving Car?


Illustrations by Bratislav Milenkovic

Here is a little part of the very interesting article...

Cadillac, which was two decades old when flappers were saying things like “the cat’s meow,” will be the first GM make to come with Super Cruise, the company’s most ambitious technological foray since automatic transmission. The system isn’t fully autonomous. Pairing adaptive cruise control with lane-centering technology, it will allow drivers, or whatever they’re called in the future, to let the car take over only on the highway. It will also, if all goes according to plan, propel GM into a multibillion-dollar race for the future of human mobility.

The question is whether GM can get to the future on time. Super Cruise won’t hit the market until 2017. Elon Musk has just begun offering autopilot on his Tesla Model S. Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, and Volvo have similar hands-free driving systems in the works. Then there’s Google, which wants to skip the half-measures and do a full-on moonshot: totally autonomous cars that, regulators willing, won’t even come with a steering wheel or gas pedal. Google’s latest prototypes are already driving themselves around Silicon Valley, where they’re known as Koala cars because of their bulbous shape, and they may be available for purchase right around the time GM’s hands-free Caddy hits showrooms.
(Courtesy of Bloomberg Businessweek)
JessePS is offline  
Old 12-22-15, 07:48 AM
  #233  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,633
Received 2,373 Likes on 1,558 Posts
Default

rumor is ford will build google's self-driving cars... next year

http://www.computerworld.com/article...next-year.html

bitkahuna is offline  
Old 12-22-15, 10:51 AM
  #234  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 89 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
rumor is ford will build google's self-driving cars... next year

http://www.computerworld.com/article...next-year.html

interesting. I wonder if the iconic mustang will get this self driving feature.
jadu is offline  
Old 12-22-15, 09:31 PM
  #235  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,077
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
interesting. I wonder if the iconic mustang will get this self driving feature.
I generally am not very thrilled on the idea of self-driving cars. But, judging by what I've seen a number of Mustang V8 drivers do on their own, I might be willing to make an exception.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-22-15, 10:37 PM
  #236  
JessePS
Lexus Test Driver

 
JessePS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: QC/FRANCE
Posts: 8,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't wait to see what Foogle comes up with

Plus Ford submitted a record number of patents this year: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...yes-innovation

Also I heard Google/Alphabet will be starting a new subsidiary in 2016 for self-driving cars: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ompany-in-2016
JessePS is offline  
Old 12-23-15, 09:33 AM
  #237  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,633
Received 2,373 Likes on 1,558 Posts
Default

excellent article on possible ford/google partnership and why others should worry, and finally speculation on societal impact of driverless cars.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamu...hip-with-ford/
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:16 PM
  #238  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,633
Received 2,373 Likes on 1,558 Posts
Default

google admits their self-driving car (a lexus rx450h) bears some responsibility in this fender bender that occurred...

http://www.computerworld.com/article...-accident.html
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 02-29-16, 09:55 PM
  #239  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,050
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

^^ very interesting. Accidents will undoubtedly happen until we have car to car communication, coming out this year in the E class
RXSF is offline  
Old 03-01-16, 01:45 AM
  #240  
Sh1nra
Pole Position
 
Sh1nra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
google admits their self-driving car (a lexus rx450h) bears some responsibility in this fender bender that occurred...

http://www.computerworld.com/article...-accident.html
Good thing no one got hurt.
I would say it they (google-self driving car) bears majority of the fault and responsibility.
It's dangerous to assume other drivers will yield or do something especially when your going much slower than traffic is poor judgement.
Sh1nra is offline  


Quick Reply: Self-Driving Vehicles



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:29 AM.