Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Self-Driving Vehicles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-18, 07:14 PM
  #826  
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
plex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 13,273
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816
Marshall, I agree with all of those things. The sum of those problems is exactly why full autonomous will never happen for the larger public. Im glad you and I get along because you see things objectively, as things should be seen.

And im just loling at some peoples' knowledge on AI. Yall do know that the best AI systems in place are in video games, right? And they can't even get that right. And these developers are some of the brightest folks you can hire. To add insult to injury, video game AI have been in development for the past 20 years. Autonomous vehicles? 6ish.
Guess that was a shot at me and jrmckinley. What's your thought's on IBM's Watson and other deep learning software? Why wouldn't AI be applied fully to Autonomous vehicles? Should self driving car innovation stop now?


Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well-written.

BTW, Och and several others also agree with you.
And mmarshall Och's responses are all based that Autonomous cars won't happen in NYC which I do agree is one of the most unique and challenging places to drive. Self driving car technology isn't just going to go away especially when the government is helping with research and efforts. https://www.transportation.gov/av/3
plex is offline  
Old 12-02-18, 07:32 PM
  #827  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,293
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plex
And mmarshall Och's responses are all based that Autonomous cars won't happen in NYC which I do agree is one of the most unique and challenging places to drive. Self driving car technology isn't just going to go away especially when the government is helping with research and efforts. https://www.transportation.gov/av/3

I'm not saying that the chances are absolute zero that reasonably-competent self-driving cars will arrive (and I don't think that theory816 or Och are, either). Just that the problems are far more complex and widespread (and will continue to be) than a lot of people realize. Tesla and Google have already found that out, with accidents and fatalities.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-02-18, 07:51 PM
  #828  
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
plex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 13,273
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I'm not saying that the chances are absolute zero that reasonably-competent self-driving cars will arrive (and I don't think that theory816 or Och are, either). Just that the problems are far more complex and widespread (and will continue to be) than a lot of people realize. Tesla and Google have already found that out, with accidents and fatalities.
Accidents and unfortunately fatalities are to be expected can't quit the process because of that. Document the lessons learned and make adjustments and keep going that's normal for any system/project development.
plex is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 11:14 AM
  #829  
theory816
Lead Lap
 
theory816's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mo
Posts: 441
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plex
Should self driving car innovation stop now?
Semi autonomous is perfectly fine and efforts should be to fine tune it. Full autonomy for the public is a bad investment because it will never work.

So it comes down to knowing if things are worth the investment.
theory816 is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 11:17 AM
  #830  
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
plex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 13,273
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816
Semi autonomous is perfectly fine and efforts should be to fine tune Semi autonomy.

Full autonomy for the public is a bad investment because it will never work.
I'm curious as to your reasons why it would "never work".
plex is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 11:25 AM
  #831  
jrmckinley
Pole Position
 
jrmckinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: fl
Posts: 3,078
Received 388 Likes on 263 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816

And im just loling at some peoples' knowledge on AI. Yall do know that the best AI systems in place are in video games, right? And they can't even get that right. And these developers are some of the brightest folks you can hire. To add insult to injury, video game AI have been in development for the past 20 years. Autonomous vehicles? 6ish.
LOL all you want, but you're wrong (and I'm not even referencing your video game comment which is absurd). I'm deep on knowledge in AI, neural networks, natural language processing, and machine learning so with all due respect, I know what I'm talking about and can spot people who don't. If a computer can read through MRI and CT scans to diagnose you with cancer (happening now), I have confidence in ultimately letting the computer drive me to the hospital.
jrmckinley is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 12:59 PM
  #832  
theory816
Lead Lap
 
theory816's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mo
Posts: 441
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plex
I'm curious as to your reasons why it would "never work".
In programming, just one little feature can have 100 to million of lines of code. The U.S. military drone uses 3.5 million lines of code. All that thing has to do is take off, land, and fly through the air and not account for anyone else in sight. And if you know anything about military research and development, it aint cheap.

An autonomous drone is programmed to do 3-10 things autonomously. A publicly used autonomous car has to be programmed to do 30-50 things autonomously. That is why SuperCruise only works on a straight line highway. So yea, full autonomy is not going to happen. Maybe in 200 years.

Originally Posted by jrmckinley
LOL all you want, but you're wrong (and I'm not even referencing your video game comment which is absurd). I'm deep on knowledge in AI, neural networks, natural language processing, and machine learning so with all due respect, I know what I'm talking about and can spot people who don't. If a computer can read through MRI and CT scans to diagnose you with cancer (happening now), I have confidence in ultimately letting the computer drive me to the hospital.
I want to be chauffeured by a car also, but its not going to happen. And I can LOL all I want because, as of now, there's no full autonomous car on public roads. Maybe you'll get the last laugh, but we'd all be dead by then.

Last edited by theory816; 12-03-18 at 01:14 PM.
theory816 is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 01:09 PM
  #833  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,195
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816
In programming, just one little feature can have 100 to million of lines of code. The U.S. military drone uses 3.5 million lines of code. All that thing has to do is take off, land, and fly through the air and not account for anyone else in sight. And if you know anything about military research and development, it aint cheap.

An autonomous drone is programmed to do 3-10 things autonomously. An autonomous car has to be programmed to do 30-50 things autonomously. That is why SuperCruise only works on a straight line highway. So yea, full autonomy is not going to happen. Maybe in 200 years.



I want to be chauffeured by a car also, but its not going to happen.
Why haven’t the big automakers consulted you on this? You seem to see something others don’t see. I for one agree, self driving cars are a long way off. I don’t see it happening other than in a limited capacity for a long time
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 01:45 PM
  #834  
riredale
Instructor
 
riredale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Just because something can be imagined does not mean it is practical or even possible. As a kid I mocked the "Star Trek" TV show because they so casually whizzed around the universe at Warp3 or whatever. Yeah, let's just get around that pesky Speed of Light limitation, shall we? Fine, it was in the writer's imagination, but in reality--nope. Not gonna happen.

So, sure, I can imagine myself hopping in an autonomous taxi and not giving the driving a second thought as it drives just like a human driver would around the city and country. But in reality, can you imagine the megamillion-dollar awards that would simply crush an automaker once folks start getting hurt or killed? So in reality--nope. Not gonna happen.

But, again, I can imagine an extremely-limited version of the above fantasy wherein an Interstate highway, modified to very precise standards, allows vehicles, also conforming to very precise standards, to drive completely hands-free while on that road. But we're a long ways from even that situation, in my humble opinion.
riredale is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 01:49 PM
  #835  
theory816
Lead Lap
 
theory816's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mo
Posts: 441
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill


Why haven’t the big automakers consulted you on this? You seem to see something others don’t see. I for one agree, self driving cars are a long way off. I don’t see it happening other than in a limited capacity for a long time


I actually do a lot of consultation in a lot of industries. Ford and I are actually working on a hands free charging system for EVs.

Dont tell them I told you that.

Last edited by theory816; 12-03-18 at 02:05 PM.
theory816 is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 02:59 PM
  #836  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,293
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816
I actually do a lot of consultation in a lot of industries.
The more I see of your posts, the more I'm beginning to believe it.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-03-18, 03:06 PM
  #837  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by riredale
Just because something can be imagined does not mean it is practical or even possible. As a kid I mocked the "Star Trek" TV show because they so casually whizzed around the universe at Warp3 or whatever. Yeah, let's just get around that pesky Speed of Light limitation, shall we? Fine, it was in the writer's imagination, but in reality--nope. Not gonna happen.
Maybe that's not going to happen. But we know that the Star Trek communicator with its "flip open" to activate certainly reminds us of the cell phone revolution back in the day does it not? And the screens that Spock and Sulu viewed look a lot like flat panel displays used in a myriad of ways. How about the viewscreen on the bridge that showed approaching Klingons bent on shooting at the Enterprise? Well that was a flat panel-looking widescreen, which of course turned into our present day 16:9 TVs.

Phasers on stun? Well law enforcement now uses Tasers on Stun
MattyG is offline  
Old 12-04-18, 03:31 AM
  #838  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,913
Received 2,442 Likes on 1,601 Posts
Default

Looking at this as either 'everything will happen' or 'nothing will happen' isn't helpful or accurate.

self driving capability will come to more vehicles but people will still be able to drive them too so if the car can't figure something out and hopefully just stops rather than driving off a cliff then the driver takes over to get through. So not an either or, it can be where the car, like an evolving super cruise can do some, more, or most of the driving. That alone will make a profound difference on the roads.

then the flipside is primarily self driving vehicles, starting out in special scenarios, not 'everything' like handling a blizzard in manhattan. shuttle service is a good example, between cities on mostly highway. Goods movement between depots, ot delivery door to door as what happens at the recipient's home, the vehicle calls the customer to say come get your stuff which isn't so convenient if you're in the 10th floor of a high rise. There's access to gated communities, and many other issues. But a growing number of scnearios will be possible, with compromises.

so maybe people here, shouldn't look at things in such a binary, all or nothing, view.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 12-04-18, 06:57 AM
  #839  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,293
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

In some ways (though I'm not holding my breath, and there are very great difficulties), I hope that self-driving cars are perfected someday. I'm still, even at my age, a pretty sharp driver, in good health except for weak knees, and, though no one has a crystal ball, I don't foresee having to hang up the key/fob any time soon. Barring anything unexpected, I'll be driving safely for decades yet....yes, in big cushy sedans if possible LOL. But, let's face it, all of us, sooner or later, will get to the point where we will have to hang it up...and I'm no exception. Self-drivers, if perfected, will help make it possible for those too old or unable to drive any more to keep living a relatively normal life...along with organizations like Uber. Even with self-drivers, though, someone will still have to know how to program them so that they know where to take their occupant (s).
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-04-18, 07:40 AM
  #840  
theory816
Lead Lap
 
theory816's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mo
Posts: 441
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In some ways (though I'm not holding my breath, and there are very great difficulties), I hope that self-driving cars are perfected someday. I'm still, even at my age, a pretty sharp driver, in good health except for weak knees, and, though no one has a crystal ball, I don't foresee having to hang up the key/fob any time soon. Barring anything unexpected, I'll be driving safely for decades yet....yes, in big cushy sedans if possible LOL. But, let's face it, all of us, sooner or later, will get to the point where we will have to hang it up...and I'm no exception. Self-drivers, if perfected, will help make it possible for those too old or unable to drive any more to keep living a relatively normal life...along with organizations like Uber. Even with self-drivers, though, someone will still have to know how to program them so that they know where to take their occupant (s).

By the time I have to hang up the keys I will have millions in my account. If I have to get around or buy miscellaneous items, I would just hire someone to do all my biddings.

Not only did I create a job but a person will be better than any computer.
theory816 is offline  


Quick Reply: Self-Driving Vehicles



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:57 AM.