Evo fq400 (hp) v/s Lambo Murcielago (top gear video)thanks TXSTYLE for vid
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Evo fq400 (hp) v/s Lambo Murcielago (top gear video)
#2
Wow...400bhp out of a 2.0L engine...beats the Lambo Murci in the lap times too!
Too bad the turbo lag makes it unfeasible for daily use, practically defeating the purpose of the four-door design.
Thanks for the great video, Sick!
Too bad the turbo lag makes it unfeasible for daily use, practically defeating the purpose of the four-door design.
Thanks for the great video, Sick!
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
To sum it up it places an amazing question. Can a 2.0 liter, 4 door keep up with an exotic that costs 3 times as much and has 3 times as much liters and displacement?
Then the 2nd part of the video goes into the EVOs drawbacks of creating such an extreme car.
Review by my boy, Clarkson.
This EVO is the most extreme and of course we don't get it.
Then the 2nd part of the video goes into the EVOs drawbacks of creating such an extreme car.
Review by my boy, Clarkson.
This EVO is the most extreme and of course we don't get it.
Trending Topics
#11
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
To sum it up it places an amazing question. Can a 2.0 liter, 4 door keep up with an exotic that costs 3 times as much and has 3 times as much liters and displacement?
To sum it up it places an amazing question. Can a 2.0 liter, 4 door keep up with an exotic that costs 3 times as much and has 3 times as much liters and displacement?
#14
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
This particular EVO would cost maybe, 60k here?
This particular EVO would cost maybe, 60k here?
If Mitsu landed that car here @ $45k - it would be THE track car.
But that would kinda suck as the SCCA would undoubtably EVOlve into a boring Evo-fest.
M.
#15
Re: Evo fq400 (hp) v/s Lambo Murcielago (top gear video)
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
http://www.evolutionfq.com/subd/plug...00-Topgear.wmv
http://www.evolutionfq.com/subd/plug...00-Topgear.wmv
NIce vid