AMG SL65 In it's Element... The Dragstrip!
01-05-05 | 01:17 PM
#1
AMG SL65 In it's Element... The Dragstrip!
Last edited by TXSTYLE; 01-05-05 at 03:28 PM.
01-05-05 | 02:45 PM
#4
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 1
From: rip current, CA
this is so sweet. thanks for the clip txstyle.
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht...
edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360
MSRP $179,720.00*
Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht...
edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360
MSRP $179,720.00*
Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
Last edited by tzu911; 01-05-05 at 02:48 PM.
01-05-05 | 03:24 PM
#5
Originally Posted by 2000gs300
this is so sweet. thanks for the clip txstyle.
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht...
edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360
MSRP $179,720.00*
Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht...
edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360
MSRP $179,720.00*
Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine
Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm
Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm
How would it do against an SLR? Anyone know???
01-05-05 | 03:44 PM
#7
Lexus Champion
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Originally Posted by GS3Tek
Wow!!! Didn't look like there were any worty competitors
How would it do against an SLR? Anyone know???
How would it do against an SLR? Anyone know???
EDIT: Treynor's a ************ nutcase with his cars, damn!
James
Last edited by jet864; 01-05-05 at 03:48 PM.
Trending Topics
01-05-05 | 04:20 PM
#9
Lexus Champion
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Washington
It's weird, it's like a family website but under his page it's basically all about his cars. Here's direct to his page.
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm
James
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm
James
01-05-05 | 04:49 PM
#10
Lexus Champion
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by jet864
It's weird, it's like a family website but under his page it's basically all about his cars. Here's direct to his page.
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm
James
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm
James
He's a "Site Reliability Czar, Google"
In other words:
SL65 courtesy of overvalued IPO.
M.
01-06-05 | 12:39 AM
#13
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Sweet car, but...
According to the latest C&D article:
"What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet.
All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin."
Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.
According to the latest C&D article:
"What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet.
All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin."
Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.
01-06-05 | 02:48 AM
#14
Originally Posted by XeroK00L
Sweet car, but...
According to the latest C&D article:
"What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet.
All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin."
Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.
According to the latest C&D article:
"What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet.
All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin."
Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.
though i agree that for the price difference the sl65 is definitely a lot more money for a little more
