Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

50K sport sedans comparo (ACURA RL, M45 and GS430)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-05, 11:58 PM
  #16  
Xenthar
Lead Lap
 
Xenthar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i meant reviews from people outside of edmunds. The m45 sport wasnt equipped with the good (optional) audio system but the gs did have the top of the line optional one. So yes, infiniti gave them the wrong car to review....oh well. This is why they actually mentioned it wasnt infiniti's top of the line audio system that the m45 was equipped with.
Xenthar is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 12:04 AM
  #17  
Xenthar
Lead Lap
 
Xenthar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I didn't see them as liking more luxury over sport. I saw them picking the best car. THe M45 sport was the sportiest but the steering did not match that. And the car rode over irregularities worse than the other 2 (think FX with the 20s). Most roads are not perfect, most are in need or work,. This means straight roads and curvy roads. This car does seem to be the most fun out the box but honestly, for 51-60k, how many people do you think are going to push the car like that?
Most people wont even be buying the gs430 or m45. Most will be buying the gs300 or m35 for normal driving. People who want to spend 51-60k will be getting the gs430 or m45 for its speed and sportiness since interior and exterior are exactly the same in their lower models. Who didnt buy the previous generation gs430 for its better performance?
Xenthar is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 05:43 AM
  #18  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,355
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
In other words, the GS is perfect if you're willing to forego the last 10 percent of the performance envelope. In years past that 10 percent is all I cared about, but at my advanced age that other 90 percent is looking more important all the time.
It's called maturity.....and simple common sense.
There's a lot more to life ( even car life ) than 0-60 times, quarter-mile, skidpad, and braking figures.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 08:24 AM
  #19  
Lil4X
Out of Warranty
 
Lil4X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,926
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
In other words, the GS is perfect if you're willing to forego the last 10 percent of the performance envelope. In years past that 10 percent is all I cared about, but at my advanced age that other 90 percent is looking more important all the time.
AMEN!

Sad to say, but over the years my needs in a car have changed too, from and all-out asphalt burner to a more comfortable, silently competent vehicle that provides comfort with solid handling and a turn of speed. David E. Davis used to call it a "Gentleman's Transport".
Lil4X is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 03:52 PM
  #20  
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
doug_999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I didn't see them as liking more luxury over sport. I saw them picking the best car. THe M45 sport was the sportiest but the steering did not match that. And the car rode over irregularities worse than the other 2 (think FX with the 20s). Most roads are not perfect, most are in need or work,. This means straight roads and curvy roads. This car does seem to be the most fun out the box but honestly, for 51-60k, how many people do you think are going to push the car like that?
I disagree. They picked the car that was the most luxurious IMHO. Xenthar is correct, if it had been the Infiniti M45 non-sport with upgraded radio it might have turned out different - at least according to Edmunds. I am curious what C&D thinks since they probably would have chosen then sportier of the three cars - but who knows. Hopefully we will see soon!

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
In other words, the GS is perfect if you're willing to forego the last 10 percent of the performance envelope. In years past that 10 percent is all I cared about, but at my advanced age that other 90 percent is looking more important all the time.
See that's my problem with the current GS and I just put my finger on this the other day. It is not a fun car - period. It is a luxury car and I need more than that .
doug_999 is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 04:13 PM
  #21  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,355
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
I .

See that's my problem with the current GS and I just put my finger on this the other day. It is not a fun car - period. It is a luxury car and I need more than that .
Well, Doug.......this begs the question, then, if Lexus in general is for you. Maybe what you really need.....or want.......is a Corvette.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-02-05, 06:22 PM
  #22  
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
doug_999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well, Doug.......this begs the question, then, if Lexus in general is for you. Maybe what you really need.....or want.......is a Corvette.
Well those would be two totally different cars now wouldn't they? Personally I don't think a Corvette is for me. There are plenty of cars out there that are fun (I suspect the new M probably is, I know any BMW is, I'm curious about the new A6 and STS, and of course there are others such as the new Legacy that look very interesting as well). My next car will have the fun quotient for sure - for all I know, maybe the 06 GS has it?
doug_999 is offline  
Old 03-03-05, 04:27 PM
  #23  
InfiniD
Driver School Candidate
 
InfiniD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It says 50K sport sedan comparison. That's what Infiniti sent. Their sportiest version for 50K. As it turns out that's not what they were testing for. I think a fully loaded M35X would have walked away with this comparison test. They didn't really care how sporty the car was. The M35X performs on the level of the other cars and has more equipment than either one. I think Infiniti can get back at Edmunds though. The next time they have a 20K sport coupe comparison, they should just send a G35 coupe. It's 10 grand more but from this review that shouldn't matter. The GS that they tested was 60K. I just read this review again and it contradicts itself over and over. I think Edmunds should be banned from any further comparison testing. They are clearly incompetent.
InfiniD is offline  
Old 03-03-05, 04:51 PM
  #24  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by InfiniD
It says 50K sport sedan comparison. That's what Infiniti sent. Their sportiest version for 50K. As it turns out that's not what they were testing for. I think a fully loaded M35X would have walked away with this comparison test. They didn't really care how sporty the car was. The M35X performs on the level of the other cars and has more equipment than either one. I think Infiniti can get back at Edmunds though. The next time they have a 20K sport coupe comparison, they should just send a G35 coupe. It's 10 grand more but from this review that shouldn't matter. The GS that they tested was 60K. I just read this review again and it contradicts itself over and over. I think Edmunds should be banned from any further comparison testing. They are clearly incompetent.
OMG, let it die. Infinti lost this one. Period. Stop making excuses. Ya'll were singing praises when the M35 own in Motor Trend.

Let it go, breathe, your holy car placed third, behind a V-6 RL. Complain to Edmunds. Tell professional car editors they are idiots. Now u suggest for them to send a loaded M35x. Some say they should have gotten a M45 non-sport. Next thing ya'll will say is they should have waited for the next generation 2010 M45.

There will be more comparisons in the future and the M45 will probably do very well.
 
Old 03-03-05, 07:26 PM
  #25  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,997
Received 2,466 Likes on 1,618 Posts
Default

The least expensive GS430 configuration with ML audio is just under $58K according to the Lexus web site so that certainly isn't "50K". Amazingly there's an $11K option package that takes the car to $62,829 again according to Lexus' web site. That's a bunch of coin. Is it worth it? Probably, this is a serious chunk of hardware and refinement. But no one should be under the illusion you can get an 06 GS430 for "$50K". No chance, unless it's used or damaged.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-03-05, 07:26 PM
  #26  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
OMG, let it die. Infinti lost this one. Period. Stop making excuses. Ya'll were singing praises when the M35 own in Motor Trend.

Let it go, breathe, your holy car placed third, behind a V-6 RL. Complain to Edmunds. Tell professional car editors they are idiots. Now u suggest for them to send a loaded M35x. Some say they should have gotten a M45 non-sport. Next thing ya'll will say is they should have waited for the next generation 2010 M45.

There will be more comparisons in the future and the M45 will probably do very well.
so well said.... it doesn't make any sense whining about it man.... just move on to the next test (my 2 cents)
rominl is offline  
Old 03-03-05, 11:50 PM
  #27  
Xenthar
Lead Lap
 
Xenthar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No ones really whining, they are just sharing their opinion on the review. Most forums ive been to are talking about the same thing--that the cars werent evenly equipped. And thats okay. Lexus won this review. No biggie.
Xenthar is offline  
Old 03-04-05, 05:53 AM
  #28  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,104
Received 226 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

The GS430 is better equipped, but because of that it loses points in the price criteria in the comparison to both RL & M45, so it's not as if they want to give the advantage to the better equipped but pricier car. It rather is how they weigh the criteria, & the arbitrariness in the reviewers assigning a point value to each criteria that can be questioned. But then you can raise the same questions in almost any comparison test in the car magazines as well if you want to take it apart.

I have said before, the rankings of these comparison tests are mostly worthless, they do it just to try to sell more magazines. The stats they generate & some of their impressions on the cars are informative, but their rankings of the cars are not to be taken seriously.
Gojirra99 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gojirra99
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
4
12-19-06 12:14 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
2
12-04-06 11:19 AM
LexFather
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
1
10-27-06 10:17 PM
jwaters
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
32
05-28-05 07:27 AM
LexFather
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
10
07-07-04 04:50 AM



Quick Reply: 50K sport sedans comparo (ACURA RL, M45 and GS430)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 AM.