Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Hybrids a bad bet money-wise (says Edmunds)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-05, 08:04 PM
  #16  
xioix
Racer

 
xioix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so. cal
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i didnt read the whole article, but did this guy mention the tax breaks?
xioix is offline  
Old 06-01-05, 09:26 PM
  #17  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,202
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

What you guys are forgetting, though, is that, while it s true that hybrids will improve in the years ahead, so will small diesels and diesel fuel...especially here in the U.S. And diesels, IMO, are already a better bet than hybrids because they offer comparable mileage, if not emissions, to hybrids with much less complexity and hardware. And new anti-emission diesel fuel and technologies.....trust me on this.....are on the way very shortly. The EPA has already mandated low-sulfur diesel fuel here starting next year.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 12:11 AM
  #18  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
Performance is a mixed bag because of the extra weight of batteries, motors, maybe more complex transmission, etc.

As far as 'panache, image, and prestige' - I don't think it's there yet, but they're certainly a talking point if you have one. But do people think you're cool if you have one, or just weird?



I guess we said the same thing.



Well the future will be, different from today, but I'm not interested in a hybrid yet. Too expensive, too complicated, too unrefined.



Yup - in 5-6 years they will be a lot better than today's ones.



That's amazing - and there's definitely a market, particularly in Lexus' demographic for a 'sensible' vehicle that's also luxurious and reliable.

Bit, if I had the dough, I'd get the GS 450h in a heartbeat, even over any 460h (unless it has 400hp like I think)

Funny, this article was on CNN today as they were talking about this very Edmunds article.
 
Old 06-02-05, 05:56 AM
  #19  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,099
Received 224 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What you guys are forgetting, though, is that, while it s true that hybrids will improve in the years ahead, so will small diesels and diesel fuel...especially here in the U.S. And diesels, IMO, are already a better bet than hybrids because they offer comparable mileage, if not emissions, to hybrids with much less complexity and hardware. And new anti-emission diesel fuel and technologies.....trust me on this.....are on the way very shortly. The EPA has already mandated low-sulfur diesel fuel here starting next year.
In the longer run , there will be no more diesels to burn ( & who knows how high diesel prices will go even in shorter terms) , supporting the advancement of hybrid technology that can work with fuel cells & other alternate sources is the way to go
Gojirra99 is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 06:46 AM
  #20  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,202
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AmethySC
In the longer run , there will be no more diesels to burn ( & who knows how high diesel prices will go even in shorter terms) , supporting the advancement of hybrid technology that can work with fuel cells & other alternate sources is the way to go
I agree hydrogen and fuel cells are ultimately best, but affordable ones for automotive use are still a long way off. And....as far as higher fuel prices, of course this will affect hybrids as well as diesels......ANYTHING that burns petroleum-based fuel.

I have written and posted in other threads about the possibility of a synthetic-oil industry...something IMO we should have done years ago when OPEC first started socking it to us.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 08:06 AM
  #21  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,791
Received 2,419 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IVXX
Exactly! So instead of *****ing over $3,000 they should chill out and be happy that it's working. I highly doubt the people that buy $40,000 are actaully unhappy they paid a little extra to save gas, and this planet...
Yes, but it's laughable because they go home and fire up that nice huge Jenn-Air grill they've got and pump out 10 times the emissions!
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 08:14 AM
  #22  
Milla...
Registered User
 
Milla...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My biggiest concern over these Hybs is maintenance what is the cost when these complicated systems start to have issues, and how long would this sort of repair take. I don't think you can simply take one of these to your neigborhood mom and pop shop to save yourself from getting ripped by inflated dealer prices.
Milla... is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 08:26 AM
  #23  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,791
Received 2,419 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Bit, if I had the dough, I'd get the GS 450h in a heartbeat, even over any 460h (unless it has 400hp like I think) .
Why? Because you think the performance and fuel economy figures will be worth the money? I'm not convinced yet that someone paying $60K for a car cares much about the cost of fuel. Now they may care on environmental grounds about the consumption of fuel, but if that's the case, they're probably interested in an Accord Hybrid or something like that as well (i.e., they're not that interested in performance). It will be interesting to see how well the 450h does. Given how new all this technology is, another reason I wouldn't buy one is that I like to keep cars a long time and would not want to own a 10 or even 5 year old hybrid that was new at the time. Once warranty's over that thing could cost a FORTUNE to repair.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 10:00 AM
  #24  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,202
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
Why? Given how new all this technology is, another reason I wouldn't buy one is that I like to keep cars a long time and would not want to own a 10 or even 5 year old hybrid that was new at the time. Once warranty's over that thing could cost a FORTUNE to repair.
The most significant long-term item on a gas-electric hybrid likely to wear out is the heavy and expensive nickel-hydride battery pack.....but they are warrantied for at least 8 years and 100,000 miles.

MY biggest apprehension with hybrids, though, has nothing to do with the warranty...or cost of repair. It is having the battery pack sit behind the rear seat directly on top of the fuel tank under the trunk panel. In a major rear-end impact, it is not out of the question that you could have sparks from damaged batteries come into contact with fuel leaking out of a ruptured gas tank.
...............Need I explain the result?
mmarshall is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 10:05 AM
  #25  
Milla...
Registered User
 
Milla...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The most significant long-term item on a gas-electric hybrid likely to wear out is the heavy and expensive nickel-hydride battery pack.....but they are warrantied for at least 8 years and 100,000 miles.
Likely but surely not limited to, and I wouldn't want to be the one find that out.
Milla... is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 12:20 PM
  #26  
WhiteTiger
Lexus Champion
 
WhiteTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would agree that some get these for environmental reasons, but my friend that bought one tells me he purchased it for economic reasons. Question, what happens to the batteries when they go bad, probably sit in a junkyard someplace or does someone know if they are recycleable? If not, maybe they aren't as environmentally friendly as one might think. And IMO, for hybrids to really make a difference on emission outputs a significantly larger percentage of the population will need to start driving them. At this point, with the few hybirds that are out there I doubt it is having any real impact environmentally. Not that it won't in the future, but as of now, the impact is minimal.

I also agree that there might be quite a few downsides to these vehicles that previous poster's have mentioned (maintenance/disposal of batteries, etc.), no track record regarding reliability and performance, potential danger in a rear end collission, etc.

Bit, that comment re: the Jenn-Aire grills was too funny
WhiteTiger is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 05:31 PM
  #27  
jet864
Lexus Champion
 
jet864's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

White Tiger,

Toyota is very serious about their batteries being taken of carefully. Here is a link (thanks xioix)

http://pressroom.toyota.com/photo_li...ml?id=20040623

Is there a recycling plan in place for nickel-metal hydride batteries?

Toyota has a comprehensive battery recycling program in place and has been recycling nickel-metal hydride batteries since the RAV4 Electric Vehicle was introduced in 1998. Every part of the battery, from the precious metals to the plastic, plates, steel case and the wiring, is recycled. To ensure that batteries come back to Toyota, each battery has a phone number on it to call for recycling information and dealers are paid a $200 "bounty" for each battery.
James
jet864 is offline  
Old 06-02-05, 07:06 PM
  #28  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well here is my point. If we are going to bash the cost of hybrids and "they are not worth the money"., well lets question everything then.

B/C lets take our beloved Lexus GS for example. THe GS 430 has an almost $9,000 increase in price over a GS 300. It does come with more features, like a hybrid Lexus. Do you really need the V-8? Do we really need the V-8 cars over the V-6 counterparts? How many times will we race or go to the track? How many times will be pass someone in traffic? How many times do we really need that extra power?

Do we really need A S600 or s SL 65 when a S 500 or hell a SL 55 can do? Audi's S4 is more than capable for 99% of people, yet there is a RS4 nearly doubling the price with 80 more hp? Is it worth it.

Getting to an M3, when u get down to it, its based of a 3 series, a 325. Is a M3 worth twice the price?

Its easiter for people to "Calculate" the price/cost ratio of hybrids and we here seem to find any reason not to get cars that are lighter or smaller or more fuel efficent.

VIVA LA SUV!!
 
Old 06-07-05, 08:27 PM
  #29  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What you guys are forgetting, though, is that, while it s true that hybrids will improve in the years ahead, so will small diesels and diesel fuel...especially here in the U.S. And diesels, IMO, are already a better bet than hybrids because they offer comparable mileage, if not emissions, to hybrids with much less complexity and hardware. And new anti-emission diesel fuel and technologies.....trust me on this.....are on the way very shortly. The EPA has already mandated low-sulfur diesel fuel here starting next year.
What you're still forgetting is that hybrid systems can be added to diesel engines. Toyota could release a hybrid diesel system very soon, and it will leave many manufacturers in the dust.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 06-07-05, 09:16 PM
  #30  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,791
Received 2,419 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Well here is my point. If we are going to bash the cost of hybrids and "they are not worth the money"., well lets question everything then.

B/C lets take our beloved Lexus GS for example. THe GS 430 has an almost $9,000 increase in price over a GS 300. It does come with more features, like a hybrid Lexus. Do you really need the V-8? Do we really need the V-8 cars over the V-6 counterparts? How many times will we race or go to the track? How many times will be pass someone in traffic? How many times do we really need that extra power?

Do we really need A S600 or s SL 65 when a S 500 or hell a SL 55 can do? Audi's S4 is more than capable for 99% of people, yet there is a RS4 nearly doubling the price with 80 more hp? Is it worth it.

Getting to an M3, when u get down to it, its based of a 3 series, a 325. Is a M3 worth twice the price?

Its easiter for people to "Calculate" the price/cost ratio of hybrids and we here seem to find any reason not to get cars that are lighter or smaller or more fuel efficent.

VIVA LA SUV!!
Hehe... well 'needs' vs. 'wants' - two very different things. If it's just about needs, then get only that. Your existing car is just fine. But if we talk about 'wants'... If a hybrid floats your boat, go for it! You're right that a V8 is pretty useless if you're stuck in gridlock all the time which is why I was ready to sell my GS400 if I hadn't moved. While I'd be stupid to drive the GS at top speed on public roads, I at least get to enjoy the accleration and torque and handling now!

Anyway, back on hybrids, it doesn't meet my criteria for needs or wants which is why I'm currently not interested, but I'm sure they will become MUCH more interesting in a few years.
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: Hybrids a bad bet money-wise (says Edmunds)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.