C&D Avalon wins comparo vs Ford 500 and Chrysler 300
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by whipimpin
No surprise here - the 500 is just trash and the 300 is about as refined, elegant and luxurious as an oil field.
I saw a white Avalon XLS on the road today - pretty nice. The trunk didn't quite fit on perfectly - but hey, if you get all flustered over a few milimeters - it's time to buy a Lexus.
M.
I saw a white Avalon XLS on the road today - pretty nice. The trunk didn't quite fit on perfectly - but hey, if you get all flustered over a few milimeters - it's time to buy a Lexus.
M.
![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#32
Lexus Champion
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
Why do you call the 500 trash? Have you seen or driven one...or its wagon-brother the Freestyle?
The general complaint is low HP (203) but the super-efficient CVT transmission (standard on AWD's) gives it performance equal to 230-240 HP with a conventional automatic, with mileage comparable to a stick.
The general complaint is low HP (203) but the super-efficient CVT transmission (standard on AWD's) gives it performance equal to 230-240 HP with a conventional automatic, with mileage comparable to a stick.
Yeah as a matter of fact - I've test-driven a Five-Hundred Limited w/ AWD & CVT. The brakes and handling are above par (FAR better than that of the Taurus it replaces) but the cabin isn't very well isolated (especially considering the price tag which hovered around 30 grand for trim level I drove) and the interior presentation is merely acceptable due in large part to the relatively crappy materials employed throughout (the lid of the storage bin on the dash didn't sit properly, for instance). As for the drivetrain - the engine was way too noisy (and it's not a pleasant noise either) for me to accept the tach to sit around 2500 rpm under moderate acceleration; 30 seconds of crappy engine noise really got under my skin. In other words - I don't like the engine tranny combo. I'm sure I'd much prefer the 6 speed auto in the FWD version.
All in all - for a safe, reliable vehicle that gets decent mileage - I'd recommend the car to anyone - just not the upper trim levels b/c there's too much of the low $20k base model to be found in them.
M.
#33
Pole Position
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon6.gif)
The 500 is way underpowered however.....I don't mind the look of it personally (although close to the Passat).....but Ford really dropped the ball when they didn't come out of the blocks with at least the 3.5L V6.
Hence the reason why it's been a very slow seller compared to other vehicles in their class!
Goes even double for the Freestyle which I just love the styling!
But no gut's!
The Chrysler 300 came to market with no less than 3 engine choices (4 now as far as I know!) & the Ford has just 1 for 2 new models? Unacceptable imo!
& yes I have driven both vehicles with just passengers & not even any cargo.
![Egads!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/pat.gif)
![Sad](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Thumb Up](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Thumb Down](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
![EEK!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/eek1.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by Lexusfreak; 06-04-05 at 01:06 PM.
#34
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by flipside909
I drove it's Mercury brother the other day at a Mercury test drive event, it sure is a step above the Taurus and the Crown Vic in terms of interior space. Very smooth and compliant. But it does have the great qualities of a Hertz Rent A Car (It actually was a new Hertz fleet car with the tags and everything).
#35
Pole Position
![Wink](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon12.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
Your assessment is pretty close, flip.....it is competent, well-designed, and an excellent suburban all-weather soccer-mom vehicle, but not terribly exciting.
![Big Grin](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Egads!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/pat.gif)
#36
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Lexusfreak
The 500 is way underpowered however.....I don't mind the look of it personally (although close to the Passat).....but Ford really dropped the ball when they didn't come out of the blocks with at least the 3.5L V6.
Hence the reason why it's been a very slow seller compared to other vehicles in their class!
Goes even double for the Freestyle which I just love the styling!
But no gut's!
The Chrysler 300 came to market with no less than 3 engine choices (4 now as far as I know!) & the Ford has just 1 for 2 new models? Unacceptable imo!
& yes I have driven both vehicles with just passengers & not even any cargo. ![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Egads!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/pat.gif)
![Sad](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Thumb Up](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Thumb Down](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsdown.gif)
![EEK!](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/eek1.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Of course you guys may have a point once you get all the seats filled with adults and the cargo area filled up. CVT or not, with 203 HP it may THEN be underpowered.
Last edited by mmarshall; 06-04-05 at 01:17 PM.
#37
Pole Position
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon6.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
Depends on what you consider "underpowered" . True, it's no Dodge Viper, but like said earlier, the AWD's CVT transmission makes the most out of every available horse and gives it performance roughly equal to a non-CVT 230 or 240 HP. If that is still underpowered in your book, fine...I'll respect your opinion.
Don't get me wrong MM, I like the styling of both the 500 & Freestyle (my wife want's to price one out when her lease is up) & the quality I feel is fantastic with these new models as is the CVT technology.......it's just someone was seriously asleep at the switch in the power department especially if the vehicles have a full load of people & cargo to carry.
![Sad](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
About a dozen automobile write up's on both vehicles (American & Canadian) say the exact same thing.
![Wink](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#38
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know this for an absolute fact, but my strong guess is that the 203 HP engine was picked because Ford engineers wanted to use the CVT for CAFE mileage requirements and that is the largest engine and the most torque that the they felt that the CVT could safely handle. Gotta remember...the CVT is only now (along with Audi) beginning to be used with more powerful V6's. Up to now the CVT has had problems with longevity, is relatively unproven long-term technology, and has primarily been used with low-power in-line fours and the old Subaru Justy in-line three. But I think......as I mentioned before....that you will soon see many more of them, especialy if Ford and Audi CVT's prove reliable with V6's.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
#39
Pole Position
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon6.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I don't know this for an absolute fact, but my strong guess is that the 203 HP engine was picked because Ford engineers wanted to use the CVT for CAFE mileage requirements and that is the largest engine and the most torque that the they felt that the CVT could safely handle. Gotta remember...the CVT is only now (along with Audi) beginning to be used with more powerful V6's. Up to now the CVT has had problems with longevity, is relatively unproven long-term technology, and has primarily been used with low-power in-line fours and the old Subaru Justy in-line three. But I think......as I mentioned before....that you will soon see many more of them, especialy if Ford and Audi CVT's prove reliable with V6's.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
![Wink](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
But your right MM, must not lose sight of the other vehicles in the test.
![Thumb Up](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Cool](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I don't know this for an absolute fact, but my strong guess is that the 203 HP engine was picked because Ford engineers wanted to use the CVT for CAFE mileage requirements and that is the largest engine and the most torque that the they felt that the CVT could safely handle. Gotta remember...the CVT is only now (along with Audi) beginning to be used with more powerful V6's. Up to now the CVT has had problems with longevity, is relatively unproven long-term technology, and has primarily been used with low-power in-line fours and the old Subaru Justy in-line three. But I think......as I mentioned before....that you will soon see many more of them, especialy if Ford and Audi CVT's prove reliable with V6's.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
So why do we get the aneamic engines. I don't even jump on the "more hp is better' bandwagon but 200hp was ample 10 years ago. That was a feat. In 2005, the 4 cylinder Acura TSX has that much peak power.
Ford can do it, they just refuse too. And are losing sales.
#41
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I don't know this for an absolute fact, but my strong guess is that the 203 HP engine was picked because Ford engineers wanted to use the CVT for CAFE mileage requirements and that is the largest engine and the most torque that the they felt that the CVT could safely handle. Gotta remember...the CVT is only now (along with Audi) beginning to be used with more powerful V6's. Up to now the CVT has had problems with longevity, is relatively unproven long-term technology, and has primarily been used with low-power in-line fours and the old Subaru Justy in-line three. But I think......as I mentioned before....that you will soon see many more of them, especialy if Ford and Audi CVT's prove reliable with V6's.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
OK, so much for the 500. There were two other cars in the test. Let's not forget them either.
![Smilie](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#43
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I'm sure Arizona's cities have their share of traffic...and are growing, but if you want to see REAL traffic jams, try the Washington-Baltimore area or (even more) the L.A. basin in SoCal.
And basing on the cars accelaration times... I dont see how it even matches those that have 230-240 hp alternatives that are anywhere from a whole second to nearly 2 seconds faster in the 1/4! (depending if comparing auto or manual competitors.)
#44
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bean
The Nissan Murano handles their 3.5L VQ just fine ![Smilie](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#45
Lexus Fanatic
![Default](https://www.clublexus.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Inabj2
Believe me phoenix traffic Matches that of Baltimore-Washington DC area. Especially in Phoenix Az. I witnessed the 2 plenty of times and its pretty damn comparable. I might even lean to Az being slightly worse! The stuff that I see in I-17 or I-10 can easily compared to what can be found on the Beltway! Especially on friday afternoons.
Last edited by mmarshall; 06-06-05 at 05:09 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XeroK00L
Car Chat
15
06-16-05 11:02 AM