GM highest in loss per vehicle in North America, report says
#1
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
GM highest in loss per vehicle in North America, report says
August 31, 2005
Troy, Michigan - General Motors had the worst per-vehicle net income of North America's top six automakers during the first half of 2005, according to a report from Harbour Consulting.
GM lost an average of US$1,227 per vehicle sold in North America during the first six months of 2005. Ford was second with a per-vehicle loss of US$139, while the Chrysler group showed a profit, of US$186 per vehicle.
All three top Japanese manufacturers also showed a profit: Nissan was the highest at US$1,826 per vehicle, followed by Toyota at US$1,488 and Honda with US$1,023.
source : canadiandriver.com
Troy, Michigan - General Motors had the worst per-vehicle net income of North America's top six automakers during the first half of 2005, according to a report from Harbour Consulting.
GM lost an average of US$1,227 per vehicle sold in North America during the first six months of 2005. Ford was second with a per-vehicle loss of US$139, while the Chrysler group showed a profit, of US$186 per vehicle.
All three top Japanese manufacturers also showed a profit: Nissan was the highest at US$1,826 per vehicle, followed by Toyota at US$1,488 and Honda with US$1,023.
source : canadiandriver.com
#4
Lexus Champion
Originally Posted by CleanSC
Yet they are *still* selling cars with employee discounts.
"Introducing the all-new Chevy Silverado. It's the all-American man's truck from the 'Heartbeat of America'... proudly made in Brazil."
#5
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: None
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's sad because I just don't see any solutions to GM's problems.
Also, I'm surprised at how high Nissan's profit per vehicle is (thought that Toyota would be tops). It's almost twice that of Honda. So I guess even though Honda sold more cars, Nissan made more money.
Total U.S. vehicle profits through June 2005.
Nissan: $1,826 x 542,721 = $991,008,546
Toyota: $1,488 x 1,114,070 = $1,657,736,160
Honda: $1,023 x 692,364 = $708,288,372
I don't even wanna calculate GM's total loss. Sad.
Also, I'm surprised at how high Nissan's profit per vehicle is (thought that Toyota would be tops). It's almost twice that of Honda. So I guess even though Honda sold more cars, Nissan made more money.
Total U.S. vehicle profits through June 2005.
Nissan: $1,826 x 542,721 = $991,008,546
Toyota: $1,488 x 1,114,070 = $1,657,736,160
Honda: $1,023 x 692,364 = $708,288,372
I don't even wanna calculate GM's total loss. Sad.
#7
Lexus Champion
Originally Posted by jrock65
Also, I'm surprised at how high Nissan's profit per vehicle is (thought that Toyota would be tops).
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Leets
Nissan does a lot of manufacturing down in Mexico where labor is extremely cheap.Toyota and Honda are primarily manufactured in the US where labor is relatively expensive. That's my guess as to why the profit numbers are what they are.
#9
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: None
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leets
Nissan does a lot of manufacturing down in Mexico where labor is extremely cheap.Toyota and Honda are primarily manufactured in the US where labor is relatively expensive. That's my guess as to why the profit numbers are what they are.
Nissan's profits are probably due to a combination of platform sharing, cost-cutting, and desirable products.
Although Nissan actually as the highest platforms to sales ratio.
Toyota has 7 platforms for 2.2M annual sales
Nissan has 6 platforms for 1.1M annual sales
Honda has 4 platforms for 1.4M annual sales.
It's gotta be cost-cutting then, which are evidenced by lower marks for the interior for some of its vehicles.
Last edited by jrock65; 08-31-05 at 10:43 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post