2002 Acura CL Type S
#61
Originally Posted by Iceman
Thanks for the info! My Acura experience has obviously been completey different. My CL is approaching 75K miles and has had fewer service problems than my 4-year-newer and approaching 45K miles GS. I should post pictures of the interior--you would swear it's a brand new car on the showroom floor. And I haven't had any issues with the windshield (that one sounds REALLY strange to me).
I used to drive an Integra GS-R that I traded in for an M Roadster. That Integra was, in so many ways, automotive perfection. The Bimmer was such a horror story that I'll probably never buy one again. My sister has driven nothing but Integras (and now RSXs) since their first year of production. Once they get to about 200,000 miles she gets a new one, not due to any "falling apart" like your friends seem to experience, but just to get the latest safety features, luxury upgrades, etc. My old officemate looked at the G35 and TSX, felt the choice was a no-brainer, and has loved her TSX for over a year now (and it, too, still looks brand new).
So we each have differing personal and second-hand experiences. I guess this is my basic point to G35_TX: personal anecdotes do not make for a strong basis of a factual case. If someone had only talked to me, they would think Acuras are some of the best-built cars sold today (and actually the J.D. Power and other quantitative sources would seem to agree). If they only talked to you, they would think Acuras are all cheaply-assembled, substandard POSs. Opinions are great (after all, the OP asked for them), but they're like, well, you know the rest of the saying...
I used to drive an Integra GS-R that I traded in for an M Roadster. That Integra was, in so many ways, automotive perfection. The Bimmer was such a horror story that I'll probably never buy one again. My sister has driven nothing but Integras (and now RSXs) since their first year of production. Once they get to about 200,000 miles she gets a new one, not due to any "falling apart" like your friends seem to experience, but just to get the latest safety features, luxury upgrades, etc. My old officemate looked at the G35 and TSX, felt the choice was a no-brainer, and has loved her TSX for over a year now (and it, too, still looks brand new).
So we each have differing personal and second-hand experiences. I guess this is my basic point to G35_TX: personal anecdotes do not make for a strong basis of a factual case. If someone had only talked to me, they would think Acuras are some of the best-built cars sold today (and actually the J.D. Power and other quantitative sources would seem to agree). If they only talked to you, they would think Acuras are all cheaply-assembled, substandard POSs. Opinions are great (after all, the OP asked for them), but they're like, well, you know the rest of the saying...
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
#62
Originally Posted by 260hpTypeS
I agree with you ICEMAN. All bias aside, Acura's and Lexus's have that same tradition of buiding motors/cars that last forever. With 77K miles, my 02TL-S still ran like the day it was new. Say what you want about the CL-S, but the J32A2 motor is one of the best V6's ever produced IMHO. I remember when the CL-S first came out, articles would rave about the engine. How could you not love that VTEC roar of the slightly modded J32A2?
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
That is great that your 02 TL made it to 77K without having to replace the tranny, but many don't make it that far.
#63
Originally Posted by 260hpTypeS
I agree with you ICEMAN. All bias aside, Acura's and Lexus's have that same tradition of buiding motors/cars that last forever. With 77K miles, my 02TL-S still ran like the day it was new. Say what you want about the CL-S, but the J32A2 motor is one of the best V6's ever produced IMHO. I remember when the CL-S first came out, articles would rave about the engine. How could you not love that VTEC roar of the slightly modded J32A2?
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
#64
Originally Posted by 260hpTypeS
I agree with you ICEMAN. All bias aside, Acura's and Lexus's have that same tradition of buiding motors/cars that last forever. With 77K miles, my 02TL-S still ran like the day it was new. Say what you want about the CL-S, but the J32A2 motor is one of the best V6's ever produced IMHO. I remember when the CL-S first came out, articles would rave about the engine. How could you not love that VTEC roar of the slightly modded J32A2?
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
VIDEO CL-S 0-100 MPH
G35_Tx is a notorious hypocrit on the internet, so dont be bothered by him ICEMAN. Just one example---(his old screenname was SilverBulletCLS on acurazine).
Here's one where he says he likes the 3rd gen TL better than the G35 :
http://tl.acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70110
Many more instances can be found on maxima forums, but I'm not going to embarass the guy...
#65
Originally Posted by G35_TX
Blind web believers? LOL! You sir have no clue what you are talking about. Besides the fact you haven't proven otherwise that the trannys haven't had a problem. When we have proven to you all the other reasons they have.
Your so-called evidence is a guy with one post on an Acura website talking about a class-action suit. And a bunch of posts, again from an internet message board, talking about Odyssey problems. Do you believe everything you read on the net?
You haven't proven a thing except that you get defensive when called on the mat. That's usually a sign of lack of faith in one's position anyway.
#66
Originally Posted by Och
You have a 3.0 CL, which did not have any transmission problems. It is the transmissions in the newer generation 3.2 TL and CL that are faulty.
You did correctly point out the fact (one of the only facts we can all agree on!) that Honda extended the warranties on these vehicles. But that fact could be interpreted to mean one of two things: 1) the transmissions did have an inherent design flaw that led to some (but not most) of them failing in a non-dangerous way, or 2) there was a mistaken PERCEPTION that they had a transmission problem and American Honda, in typical fashion, chose to proactively head off the issue in the interest of good PR and customer goodwill.
Personally I believe that #1 is the case, that there WAS something wrong with that design, but what I have been arguing here is that the extent of the problem has been blown way out of proportion and probably shouldn't seriously impact the OP's purchase decision. It's like people talking about how "delicate" plasma screens are. All it takes is one person who's buddy drops his new TV while installing it, complains about how easily it broke, it gets posted on the net, and suddenly people who have no clue what they're talking about think they are authoritative experts on the failure rate of plasma screens. And they conveniently forget about how they all seem to survive transport within the factory, shipping across the Pacific, trucking and train movement to warehouses across the U.S., shipment to retailers, and the thousands upon thousands that are taken home and installed with no problem.
#67
Originally Posted by Iceman
Do you believe everything you read on the net?
The transmission problems in the TL/CL is a fact. Do you really think that thousands of people are going to make up stories of their tranny's failing and post that online, and even sign a petition pleading for Acura to fix the problem?
#68
Originally Posted by Iceman
How am I supposed to prove a negative? Prove to me that Nissan DOESN'T inflate all their HP figures. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. In this case, that some large percentage of Acura CL/TL/MDX and Honda Odyssey transmissions fail prematurely.
Your so-called evidence is a guy with one post on an Acura website talking about a class-action suit. And a bunch of posts, again from an internet message board, talking about Odyssey problems. Do you believe everything you read on the net?
You haven't proven a thing except that you get defensive when called on the mat. That's usually a sign of lack of faith in one's position anyway.
Your so-called evidence is a guy with one post on an Acura website talking about a class-action suit. And a bunch of posts, again from an internet message board, talking about Odyssey problems. Do you believe everything you read on the net?
You haven't proven a thing except that you get defensive when called on the mat. That's usually a sign of lack of faith in one's position anyway.
I haven't proven a thing? Or your just ignoring the fact which is obvious.
Nissan has always underated there engines especially the VQ. All dyno tests have proven this and 1/4 times.
I know people with Odysseys, and they have also been through trannys which are also NOT on the forum.
#69
you know, you guys NEVER listen, period. i posted clearly in my post that i DO NOT want to see anymore name calling. i just want to see the thread getting back on track and back on topic about the car, acura cl-s
but you guys do not listen, never. all i see is completely finger pointing, and i start to see stuff about infiniti and what not. what the is that, did i NOT make myself clear?
260hp, you get a warning for starting all these. before your post, everything was still ok, i still saw good info and facts going back and forth. you started the name calling and you KNEW excatly what's going to follow.
g35, you get a warning for continue to fight back even after my warning. i know you are trying to stay on track, but you completely missed my point of the warning to stop this thread from being closed.
iceman, you get a warning for name calling and also bringing completely off topic and unnecessary information to a thread with a lot of heat. why did you just have to bring in infiniti stuff? does it have anything to do with this thread? NO. did you read my post about no name calling? NO...
i have seen enough of these threads between acura and infiniti. 90% of the time these threads end up closed. i am so tired of this and i don't want to see it anymore...
but you guys do not listen, never. all i see is completely finger pointing, and i start to see stuff about infiniti and what not. what the is that, did i NOT make myself clear?
260hp, you get a warning for starting all these. before your post, everything was still ok, i still saw good info and facts going back and forth. you started the name calling and you KNEW excatly what's going to follow.
g35, you get a warning for continue to fight back even after my warning. i know you are trying to stay on track, but you completely missed my point of the warning to stop this thread from being closed.
iceman, you get a warning for name calling and also bringing completely off topic and unnecessary information to a thread with a lot of heat. why did you just have to bring in infiniti stuff? does it have anything to do with this thread? NO. did you read my post about no name calling? NO...
i have seen enough of these threads between acura and infiniti. 90% of the time these threads end up closed. i am so tired of this and i don't want to see it anymore...
Last edited by rominl; 11-17-05 at 01:18 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post