trade my 92 SC400 for 97 TEG GSR?
01-24-06, 06:03 PM
#16
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
You have the FOGGIEST idea what your talking about. The SC and Supra share nothing but the 2JZ in the SC 300. Please stop with the ridiculous propoganda.
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
The Civic and Integra are indeed related, in comparison. And don't get me wrong, I LOVE both these cars in that era.
The Intergra GSR is a blast to drive, if u drive it hard, gas savings will be minimal, someting to think about
The Intergra GSR is a blast to drive, if u drive it hard, gas savings will be minimal, someting to think about
Agreed, and like I said before, the only good reason to make this trade is only to get a newer car with lesser mileage.
01-25-06, 06:21 PM
#19
Uh, the entire suspension is the same as the Supra from the hubs to the frame.
The Integra I had didn't get all that great of gas mileage, had no low end, was overweight imo.
Very over engineered though, and yes it was stolen.
The Integra I had didn't get all that great of gas mileage, had no low end, was overweight imo.
Very over engineered though, and yes it was stolen.
01-25-06, 10:16 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Och
Didn't mean it in a bad way - but I though the SC was based on Supra chassis? Wasn't SC called "supra something" in japan? In any case, whether it is based on Supra or not, I didn't mean it in a bad way, Supra is one of the best sport cars ever made, and there's no shame in basing anything on it's platform.
Agreed, and like I said before, the only good reason to make this trade is only to get a newer car with lesser mileage.
Agreed, and like I said before, the only good reason to make this trade is only to get a newer car with lesser mileage.
Lexus spares no expense in its top models, the LS and SC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NAZTY97
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
17
11-22-02 05:34 AM
