Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
View Poll Results: Is a car that traps a 127mph 1/4 mile capable of running 10's?
Yes
33.33%
No
16.67%
Not enough info.
50.00%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Trap speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-06, 07:29 AM
  #1  
baggio2000
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
baggio2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Trap speed

Hey guys, quick question, do you think a car that traps a 127mph 1/4 mile is capable of running 10's? thanks!

Last edited by baggio2000; 01-26-06 at 07:32 AM.
baggio2000 is offline  
Old 01-26-06, 09:44 AM
  #2  
mkorsu
Zombie Slayer
 
mkorsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East Bumble F, NJ
Posts: 6,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My vote is leaning towards no. Maybe with a great 60 foot a 10.8+ is attainable, but I'm still inclined to say 127 trap speed will result in a time just short of the 10's.
mkorsu is offline  
Old 01-26-06, 10:17 AM
  #3  
picus
Lexus Test Driver
 
picus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ON
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's impossible to say without more information; as mkorsu mentioned a 60' would be very helpful. I've seen quite a few low 11's with 129-130mph traps, so I'd say it's possible but not probable - but more information is definitely needed.
picus is offline  
Old 01-26-06, 12:56 PM
  #4  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,246
Received 163 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

I don't know. I have seen a muscle car at my local track (7,400 foot elevation) pull a 10.7 with 200 km/h trap. However, I have noticed that vehicle speeds run differently from car to car. I raced a V8 modified truck and the difference in times was .1 second, but his vehicle speed was about 8 km/h slower than mine.
Lexmex is offline  
Old 01-27-06, 07:02 AM
  #5  
baggio2000
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
baggio2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok, guys, what about with optimal track conditions, 60ft time of 1.6s, and a good driver.
baggio2000 is offline  
Old 01-27-06, 07:07 AM
  #6  
mkorsu
Zombie Slayer
 
mkorsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East Bumble F, NJ
Posts: 6,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A 1.6 60 is pretty good. That, a good driver, and a cool evening and I would say it's doable. I still think that even with all those factors, the times would be in the 10.8x to 11.1x range.

One run might be in the 10's and the next might be in the 11's. Only way to know for certain is to get that cat out there and run it!!!
mkorsu is offline  
Old 01-27-06, 07:53 AM
  #7  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,246
Received 163 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

You'll definitely do under 2 seconds in the 60 foot department. 1.6 should be possible.
Lexmex is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bax
Car Chat
43
09-04-13 05:22 PM
caymandive
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
23
09-01-07 05:21 PM



Quick Reply: Trap speed



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:11 PM.