Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

M5 outsmarts itself - Clunky high-tech shifter mars BMW's smooth performance . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-06, 09:12 AM
  #16  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
The 425hp "300C" is not just a 300C with a bigger engine. It's the SRT-8 version with massively upgraded brakes, handling, and pretty much everything. It pulls 0.90g on the skidpad, can go 66+ mph through slalom courses, stop from 60 mph in about 120 ft, and runs about 13-flat in the 1/4 mile. That's all on a par with if not better than a BMW 550i for a good $20-30k less.

And not everybody cares about interior quality.
Yeah, for what 39-40k, its a smoking deal. Not really M5 competiton but IMO, a MUCH better deal than the STS-V. The CTS-V is more but does have a manual.

Honestly if brute power is what you want, its hard to go around the SRT-8.
 
Old 05-07-06, 10:16 AM
  #17  
UberNoob
Lexus Fanatic
 
UberNoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles/Vancouver
Posts: 6,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
The 425hp "300C" is not just a 300C with a bigger engine. It's the SRT-8 version with massively upgraded brakes, handling, and pretty much everything. It pulls 0.90g on the skidpad, can go 66+ mph through slalom courses, stop from 60 mph in about 120 ft, and runs about 13-flat in the 1/4 mile. That's all on a par with if not better than a BMW 550i for a good $20-30k less.

And not everybody cares about interior quality.
that actually seems good numbers for such a heavy car
but how does it fair on the track against Pontiac GTO for example?
UberNoob is offline  
Old 05-07-06, 10:20 AM
  #18  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by UberNoob
that actually seems good numbers for such a heavy car
but how does it fair on the track against Pontiac GTO for example?
SRT-8 is no track car! Neither is the GTO though
 
Old 05-07-06, 01:44 PM
  #19  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,089
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Getting smooth ( or acceptably smooth ) automatic or semi-automatic shifts out of a transmission without a fluid-filled torque converter compartment or a fluid-filled transmission itself like Buick's old Dynaflow has proven to be exceedingly difficult for transmission engineers to master. Because of the mechanical, rather than fluid, nature of the transmission you invariably have metal-to-metal contact parts instead of fluid where the shift-shock can be dispersed in. Audi, with the double-clutch DSG ( Direct-Shift-Gearbox ) seems to have done by far the best job...that transmission is truly a major advance in powertrain enginneering.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-07-06, 01:55 PM
  #20  
J.P.
Lexus Test Driver

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DaveGS4
Interesting article, but I've seen some of the most biased drivel come out of that newspaper over the past few years that I pay it little attention. Home town paper sells to stoke the local egos.

The freep and the news has always been that way and chances are, always will. Take it for what it is, a Detroit news paper.....
J.P. is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DASHOCKER
Car Chat
19
05-19-09 10:58 PM
genearch
Car Chat
8
07-18-07 04:40 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
14
10-26-05 10:56 PM



Quick Reply: M5 outsmarts itself - Clunky high-tech shifter mars BMW's smooth performance . . .



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 AM.