Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

July 2006 Car Sales Official Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-06, 01:54 PM
  #31  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by jrock65
Heavily SUV dependent lineup (mostly truck-based) + aging sedans = bad move

Once the Versa inventories catch up and the sedan comes out, sales should level off at around 5000.

The new Altima and Sentra should help stem the bleeding later in the year.
I agree with those observations. I think sales will continue though, overall to be down, not breaking even. Your thoughts?

And with Infinitii, they have a new G35 sedan coming but nothing else, will that make sales even? And it seems 10k a month is their max.
 
Old 08-01-06, 02:01 PM
  #32  
Hypnotik
Lead Lap
 
Hypnotik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They did predict and anticipate that sales for the nissan and infiniti line would be down due to the lack of new product. Not a smart move imo. We'll see how things go as the new products roll in. Besides the M, there are no other new products to attract buyers into the dealerships. I think the G will help
Hypnotik is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 02:05 PM
  #33  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Well Nissan has an aging lineup and cant seem to be able to sell their aging cars, so whenever they update the vehicle, their sales will go up... It just sucks for them that their cars are down in the age when everyone's passanger cars are up. It shows they are not doing something right.

Infiniti I dont know anymore. Sedans are doing fine (G35 is still doing awesome), but their SUV's are doing horrible.
spwolf is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 03:00 PM
  #34  
jrock65
Lexus Test Driver
 
jrock65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: None
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
I agree with those observations. I think sales will continue though, overall to be down, not breaking even. Your thoughts?

And with Infinitii, they have a new G35 sedan coming but nothing else, will that make sales even? And it seems 10k a month is their max.
I think that sales will be okay once their new sedans come out. So starting about October, sales will probably break even, or maybe even go up a couple percentage points. We'll just have to wait and see.

Infiniti will probably break even once the new G35 and coupe are out (i.e., compensating for dropping FX and QX sales; M should hold steady).

The goal for Infiniti, shouldn't really be overall sales. The goal should be to do well in the segments that they are in. The G does well in its segment, and so does the M. The Q is simply a colossal failure.

The QX actually is on target to meet the annual sales goal of 10,000. But Infiniti missed a golden opportunity to really make a name for itself in this segment and give the Escalade a run for its money. The QX is too similar to the Armada and has had too many quality problems. It's tough to sell fullsize SUVs in this market anyway with these gas prices.

That brings us to the FX. I happen to think that 25,000 annual sales is okay for this vehicle. The FX will never go anywhere near the RX's 100,000 annual sales. While it is true that the FX and RX are both luxury "SUVs" for about the same price, and some shoppers do cross-shop the two, IMO they compete in different markets. The FX is a RWD-biased wagon that has a harsh ride, great handling, and little utility. It also has very polarizing styling. The RX is FWD-biased, soft-riding, and is all about luxury.

So basically the FX is more of a niche, sporty raised wagon, and the RX is more of a mainstream luxury SUV. Both vehicles do an excellent job of what they're supposed to do.

I don't think that Infiniti plans on making a more conventional Murano-based SUV to directly compete against the RX and MDX.
jrock65 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 03:43 PM
  #35  
GS69
Lead Lap
 
GS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 4,238
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Lightbulb My Quick $.02

  • The Corolla sales are baffling -- this much of an increase over last year? I read somewhere it was bc GM cut back their fleet sales so Corolla took over. In these times of people being gas consumption aware - I think that it is appropriate if it outsells the Camry
  • The Accord is oddly only a couple of thousand behind the Camry -- which unless I am looking at it wrong, is slightly down from last year this month despite not having a negative mark
  • GS - eh, I will let everyone else argue this but I am sure sales will go up w/ the new engines
  • The RL @ least has stabilized its low sales
  • IS/ES - Thank goodness for these 2 or Lexus sales would not look cute
  • Suzuki is on a roll - lucky 4 them SUV/truck sales are down & compacts are up
  • Honda needs to hurry up & build that plant bc I hear it is hard to get a Civic & Fit & that might explain their relatively low sales
  • I am surprised by the Yaris sales - that thing looks cheap to me; the Scion Xa looks more expensive & nicer
  • I only wish the best for Mitsubishi & Isuzu

Last edited by GS69; 08-01-06 at 03:51 PM.
GS69 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 04:11 PM
  #36  
RON430
Lexus Fanatic
 
RON430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No point discussing GS sales, or lack thereof. The 350 should be generating numbers sometime and we can see what it does for the volume GS model. We shouldn't have too many more months to wait for LS sales numbers. As for a GS460 set of numbers, I don't expect any data for a long time. I just don't think it is a priority for Lexus to put the 460 in the GS very quickly.

I wonder if gas mileage is starting to affect luxo sales? In Merc, the S is doing well but then it is living off of the first year gottahaves. I am sure the bimmophiles will be able to post the reason for the bimmer declines due to huge incentives or some such thing last year but the year over year July numbers don't look like a trend that they should be happy about if it sticks around.

A6 sales increased 13%? Whodathunk?
RON430 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 04:38 PM
  #37  
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
encore888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Lexus is doing well, coasting on the strength of its big volume models...ES/IS/RX...and may I say, they are best-in-class and well-deserving of their high sales.

The 'Lexus Golden Opportunity' sales event just started, I wonder what effect that will have? Lexus sales are already up to record levels.
encore888 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 05:06 PM
  #38  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrock65
I think that sales will be okay once their new sedans come out. So starting about October, sales will probably break even, or maybe even go up a couple percentage points. We'll just have to wait and see.

Infiniti will probably break even once the new G35 and coupe are out (i.e., compensating for dropping FX and QX sales; M should hold steady).

The goal for Infiniti, shouldn't really be overall sales. The goal should be to do well in the segments that they are in. The G does well in its segment, and so does the M. The Q is simply a colossal failure.

The QX actually is on target to meet the annual sales goal of 10,000. But Infiniti missed a golden opportunity to really make a name for itself in this segment and give the Escalade a run for its money. The QX is too similar to the Armada and has had too many quality problems. It's tough to sell fullsize SUVs in this market anyway with these gas prices.

That brings us to the FX. I happen to think that 25,000 annual sales is okay for this vehicle. The FX will never go anywhere near the RX's 100,000 annual sales. While it is true that the FX and RX are both luxury "SUVs" for about the same price, and some shoppers do cross-shop the two, IMO they compete in different markets. The FX is a RWD-biased wagon that has a harsh ride, great handling, and little utility. It also has very polarizing styling. The RX is FWD-biased, soft-riding, and is all about luxury.

So basically the FX is more of a niche, sporty raised wagon, and the RX is more of a mainstream luxury SUV. Both vehicles do an excellent job of what they're supposed to do.

I don't think that Infiniti plans on making a more conventional Murano-based SUV to directly compete against the RX and MDX.
you think Nissan wants only 25k sales of FX? Considering they sell mostly in the US, I dont see how they can justify the cost of development.

It is probably the worst selling luxury SUV, I doubt anyone targets that.
spwolf is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 05:42 PM
  #39  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
you think Nissan wants only 25k sales of FX? Considering they sell mostly in the US, I dont see how they can justify the cost of development.

It is probably the worst selling luxury SUV, I doubt anyone targets that.
I do agree with Jrock they could not possibly want 100k sales a year like the RX or even 70k like the MDX but 25k is awful, especially since it just got revised this year, they have a HUGE advertising campaign and sales are down.

Not sure what to think anymore. The Q45 is now discontinued, its not on the website for 2007 or 2007 print. QX sales will continue to drop as M sales. The G35 sedan comes, then the coupe a year later. That is basically it.

We are looking at a lineup of 2 cars (G/M 35/45) and 2 SUVs (FX/QX).
 
Old 08-01-06, 05:47 PM
  #40  
GS69
Lead Lap
 
GS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 4,238
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Arrow B4 Anyone Asks

Entry Level Sales:
  • 3 Series 8,585
  • ES 7,803
  • TL 6,304
  • C Class 5,285
  • G35 3,128/2,090 - 5,218
  • IS 4,848
  • A4 2,917

Mid Level Sales:
  • E class 4,479
  • 5 Series 3,474
  • M 2,293
  • GS 1,776/299 - 2,075
  • A6 1,652
  • RL 1,272





GS69 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 06:21 PM
  #41  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by genearch
A

Actually, the only Lexus models that have a sales increase were the ES @ a 19% clip and the great sales of the IS... without those, Lexus would be in the *****ter. As a brand, Lexus was up a mere 1.5%. 78% of all Lexus cars sold were either the ES (48%) and IS (30%)

Nissan is in bad shape all around. I think the Audi Q7 will sell, the issue is that there aren't many available quite yet.
well, thats why you have new models, to increase sales, yeah? Or is there some other reason?
And actually, Lexus was up 5.6%
:-).

Whats your take on BMW's poor performance this month? 13.4% down is pretty darn big.
spwolf is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 06:45 PM
  #42  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by genearch
No.. Lexus as a whole was up (July/July) 1.5%

No take on BMW sales.. why do I even care? I've never made a point about BMW vs Lexus. (feel free to search)

I generally only raise BMW issues when facts are not being spoken. My BMW's were purchased because Lexus offered no equal in either segment. Find me a Lexus model that can match what I have across the board, and I'd have likely purchased it.

Keeping it real...
BMW (Group) was down 12% July05 /July06, but up 5.3% Y-T-D (180,857 sold)
BMW (Brand) was down 13.5% july05/ July06, but up 7.7% Y-T-D (157,303 sold)
Lexus was up 1.5% july 05/ July 06, but up 5.4% Y-T-D (177,700 sold)
No, Lexus as an whole was up 5.6%. Passanger cars Lexus was up 22%. Percentages are adjusted based on selling days in the month.

And you are adding Mini sales to BMW sales, BMW brand sells considerably less vehicles than Lexus - BMW brand sold 20k in July vs 26k for Lexus for example. For the year, numbers are 157k for BMW brand vs 177k for Lexus.

Now, BMW's drop of 13.7% is a lot more of an problem than Lexus having "only" 3 big hits :-).
spwolf is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 06:58 PM
  #43  
GS69
Lead Lap
 
GS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 4,238
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Talking Toyota #2


Ford Displaced by Toyota as #2 Automaker
Toyota knocked Ford out of the number two automaker slot in July, for the first time ever. But that wasn't the only major shift in the top five this month. Honda also pushed the Chrysler Group out of fourth place. While DaimlerChrysler as a whole outsold Honda by around 20,000 units, this marks a change from last month, when Chrysler Group outsold Honda.

* 1. General Motors (406,298)
* 2. Toyota (241,826)
* 3. Ford (240,011)
* 4. Honda (151,804)
* 5. Chrysler Group (150,349)


GS69 is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 06:59 PM
  #44  
biker
Lead Lap
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GS69
Entry Level Sales:
  • 3 Series 8,585
  • ES 7,803
  • TL 6,304
  • C Class 5,285
  • G35 3,128/2,090 - 5,218
  • IS 4,848
  • A4 2,917

TSX - 3799 another record
biker is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 07:07 PM
  #45  
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
doug_999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
No, Lexus as an whole was up 5.6%. Passanger cars Lexus was up 22%. Percentages are adjusted based on selling days in the month.
Spwolf - do you work in marketing? Something tells me you do

Yes, Toyota uses the tricky DSR (Daily Selling Rate ) for their percentages - makes your numbers look better if you need them to.

BMW does not.

So, with DSR
Lexus up 5.6%
BMW down 9.9%

So without DSR
Lexus up 1.5%
BMW down 13.4%
doug_999 is offline  


Quick Reply: July 2006 Car Sales Official Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 PM.