Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

California Sues Carmakers (including Toyota)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-06, 01:07 AM
  #31  
Inabj2
Lexus Champion
 
Inabj2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

**** it id pull out of that market. See how cali likes that. No more new cars for you. You would see people in cali very rapidly voting off their current legislators.

The only way to deal with their problem of having to meet to strict of legislations is to do just that. Get together as car companies and boycott the state. the dollars lost in sales would be compensated in having to meet more reasonable standards.
Inabj2 is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 02:19 AM
  #32  
jracerlmn
Lexus Champion
 
jracerlmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,973
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i know i said liberals...but there can be liberal republicans just as there can be conservative democrats...

i just wish people would use common sense before suing...
jracerlmn is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 04:39 AM
  #33  
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
 
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't they also realize what would happen to automotive pricing if these companies were forced to use the highest technologies available to meet the standards California is looking for?

Entry level cars (Corolla class, ect.) for $35,000?

It's not that easy California! Otherwise it would already be happening.

Even Toyota with its substantial wealth would be hardpressed to rush something like this onto the market and expect them to sell at premium prices.
-J-P-L- is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 05:46 AM
  #34  
Tammy
Lexus Champion
 
Tammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

California, as all states, have too many attorneys.

These lawyers need to be held personally responsible to the taxpayer for filing these suits against the public. When they lose, they pay the defense cost to the taxpayer. Let's also make the schools that train them also financially responsible.

The public in California are the ones purchasing the fuel, driving the autos and polluting the air. Most have multiple vehicles. No one is suing for multiple vehicles, because the attorneys are then part of the problem.

If there were limits on how many vehicles a family may register at a single household, the vehicle numbers and pollution would drop dramatically.
Tammy is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 06:22 AM
  #35  
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
 
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tammy
....
If there were limits on how many vehicles a family may register at a single household, the vehicle numbers and pollution would drop dramatically.
This wouldn't really change anything because people can only drive ONE of their cars at a time. If every driver had one car, there would be the same amount of cars on the road as if each driver owned three cars each.

It would only change if car pooling increased. And we know that most can't really car pool as they have different origins and destinations.
-J-P-L- is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 06:40 AM
  #36  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,991
Received 2,466 Likes on 1,618 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JLSC4
This wouldn't really change anything because people can only drive ONE of their cars at a time. If every driver had one car, there would be the same amount of cars on the road as if each driver owned three cars each.
Perhaps what Tammy meant was if a household has two parents and 3 teenagers the home might have 5 or more vehicles ALL GOING AROUND CONCURRENTLY. By limiting that to 3 (which I'm not advocating) there would be at most only 3 on the road at once forcing trip consolidation, although it's debatable how much pollution might be reduced.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 06:51 AM
  #37  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,247
Received 163 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Inabj2
**** it id pull out of that market. See how cali likes that. No more new cars for you. You would see people in cali very rapidly voting off their current legislators.

The only way to deal with their problem of having to meet to strict of legislations is to do just that. Get together as car companies and boycott the state. the dollars lost in sales would be compensated in having to meet more reasonable standards.
I so agree.

In Mexico, a lot of foreign auto manufacturers would not sell in Mexico due to requirements that required usually a manufacturing plant in Mexico. In some cases like VW and some other groups, this made sense since there were definitely going to be potential buyers to justify it, but in other cases it made absolutely no sense since the market was limited...that is why you have to pay a small fortune (due to taxes) to buy a Ferrari here.

There actually has been enough pressure put via trade treaties (especially in the case of Japan) to limit the amount of required investment, but for years Mexico had a take it or leave it policy.

I can imagine if the auto manufacturers basically ignored CA due to emissions requirement, people would indeed make the political decision to curtail CARB and politicians.
Lexmex is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 09:06 AM
  #38  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

cali needs to fix their abyssmal transit or highway system, then there would be less cars on the road and less pollution, OH NOES LOGIC
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 09:18 AM
  #39  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,344
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
.

Is Schwarzenegger really supporting this?
An interesting question, considering that he owns THREE Hummer H1's...one of the most polluting vehicles on the road.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 09:20 AM
  #40  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,344
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Inabj2
**** it id pull out of that market. See how cali likes that. No more new cars for you. You would see people in cali very rapidly voting off their current legislators.
EXACTLY what I was thinking, Inabj2....you just beat me to the posting.

Last edited by mmarshall; 09-21-06 at 09:29 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 10:09 AM
  #41  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,247
Received 163 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

When I was a kid and first learned about emissions testing (we had it in Florida for almost 10 years before it got canned ), I just could not believe when my CA relatives told me about all these restrictions and the like...I was like WTF...I always had this beautiful picture of California being the greatest place on the earth to modify and beautify cars.
Lexmex is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 10:24 AM
  #42  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

California is run by old geezers with a combined IQ of 13.
GSteg is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 11:38 AM
  #43  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,344
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
California is run by old geezers with a combined IQ of 13.
When I listen to the people talk who represent the state in Congress.....especially Pelosi and Boxer....even that may be stretching it.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 11:57 AM
  #44  
EmeraldLexuSC3
Pole Position
 
EmeraldLexuSC3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 3,122
Received 36 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

The lawsuit is absolutely asinine!
This is only directed to Automakers, if emissions is a global thing, they fail to mention the Big rig TRUCKS!! and most of these come through California from out-of state.
do we not pay the State to have our vehicles' check for compliance of emissions???
EmeraldLexuSC3 is offline  
Old 09-21-06, 12:05 PM
  #45  
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Max707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,728
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GS69
Cali Sues Carmakers Over Greenhouse Effect
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California filed suit against Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Toyota Motor Corp. and three other carmakers on Wednesday, charging that greenhouse gases from their vehicles have cost the state millions of dollars.

State Attorney General Bill Lockyer said the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California was the first of its kind to seek to hold manufacturers liable for the damages caused by their vehicles' emissions.

The lawsuit also names Chrysler Motors Corp., the U.S. arm of Germany's DaimlerChrysler, and the North American units of Honda Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

Why don't they sue Mexico over the illegal aliens? Makes more sense.
Max707 is offline  


Quick Reply: California Sues Carmakers (including Toyota)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 AM.