Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

How does the "F" series compete with the "M"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-07, 06:05 AM
  #61  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

IS-F competes but not directly, it competes in its own way not being a Lexus carbon copy of the M
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 06:14 AM
  #62  
JZA80MHU38
Lead Lap
 
JZA80MHU38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
IS-F competes but not directly, it competes in its own way not being a Lexus carbon copy of the M
What does it really mean?
JZA80MHU38 is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 07:58 AM
  #63  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JZA80MHU38
What does it really mean?
The IS-F is not trying to be "another" M3.

The IS-F is Lexus' expression of its own unique performance sports sedan.

You want to compare it to the M3 or S4 or CTS-V? Do it. Will it make you happy? Maybe.

Will the IS-F suit your needs, instead of just being part of a contest between one car versus another? You'll find out in about a year...
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 08:02 AM
  #64  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Remember, The IS-f is being made by the same comapnt that created the Supra. Philip is right^^. Let us wait and see what comes about with this car. But, I love the discussions so far
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 09:06 AM
  #65  
mavericck
Lexus Test Driver
 
mavericck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
IS-F competes but not directly, it competes in its own way not being a Lexus carbon copy of the M
What do you mean not compete directly with the M, S/RS, and AMG? That is exactly what the IS-F is meant to do. That's exactly what the IS, GS, and LS were meant to do.
mavericck is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 09:14 AM
  #66  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ff_
...which is a cop-out. They know that they still have to make it a Lexus, which means softer suspension, less feel, less noise making its way into the cabin.


Compared to a Corolla or Camry, sure. But compared to its competition, it handles poorly. Again, soft suspension, lack of feedback to the driver, and too much weight.


I'm afraid, for Lexus' sake, that the rules they break will result in a car that won't be classified as a performance car.
Softer suspension? Have you ever driven an IS350 with sport package? Would you call that soft? And compared to an IS350 Sport Package, the IS-F will have a stiffer, lower, and flatter suspension.

How does it handle poorly? Can you specifically elaborate on this point? Does it lack sporty FEEL, or does it objectively handle poorly?

Would you classify the IS350 as "performance car"? For instance, 0 - 60 in 4.9 sec, 1/4 mile in 13.5 sec, and a faster slalom time than either the new G35 or the TL-S, as recorded by R & T.

Is a "performance car" defined only by a sporty feel, objectively strong performance numbers, or both? Is then a Civic Si or a Mini Cooper S a "performance car"? Is the G35 a "performance car"?

It appears many enthusiasts, including some on ClubLexus, change their definition of what a "performance car" is to favour their arguments in a certain context.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 09:22 AM
  #67  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
Hehe, that aside, of course MY GS400 with 19s handled great, but that was an expensive suspension setup that I doubt will be implemented in the IS-F but who knows, they've got a year!
Exactly, who knows!

Point is, the suspension, the anti-roll bars, the bushings, the springs, and even the steering are all exclusively designed for the IS-F. This is straight from Lexus PR. So right there we have confirmation that quite a lot of parts in the IS-F are exclusive from the IS250, and even the IS350. The exhaust is also likely unique, and then engine certainly is unique, being the 5.0L 2UR-FSE with performance tuned heads (Yamaha helping out). How about the exclusive direct sport shift 8 speed? This has more gears than the IS350, *and* it shifts faster than an IS350.

Does the IS-F have a stiffer chassis, or chassis enhancements? Does it have underbody bracing like the Tacoma X-Runner or Camry SE? Who knows. Lexus has definitely not revealed all details.

The only thing we know so far, is that having seen the spy videos of the IS-F test mules running aroung the 'Ring, this thing is FAST, corners very flat, and was able to hang with M5s and 911s on the track. This is a totally different league than the IS350.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 09:49 AM
  #68  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Exactly, who knows!

Point is, the suspension, the anti-roll bars, the bushings, the springs, and even the steering are all exclusively designed for the IS-F. This is straight from Lexus PR. So right there we have confirmation that quite a lot of parts in the IS-F are exclusive from the IS250, and even the IS350. The exhaust is also likely unique, and then engine certainly is unique, being the 5.0L 2UR-FSE with performance tuned heads (Yamaha helping out). How about the exclusive direct sport shift 8 speed? This has more gears than the IS350, *and* it shifts faster than an IS350.

Does the IS-F have a stiffer chassis, or chassis enhancements? Does it have underbody bracing like the Tacoma X-Runner or Camry SE? Who knows. Lexus has definitely not revealed all details.

The only thing we know so far, is that having seen the spy videos of the IS-F test mules running aroung the 'Ring, this thing is FAST, corners very flat, and was able to hang with M5s and 911s on the track. This is a totally different league than the IS350.
Post up the vids around the ring for us to see
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 10:07 AM
  #69  
Hameed
EV ftw!!!

 
Hameed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lake Ontario
Posts: 8,580
Received 314 Likes on 192 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
Post up the vids around the ring for us to see
I remember watching one vid, just don't remember where I saw it. Try searching on YouTube.
Hameed is online now  
Old 01-11-07, 10:15 AM
  #70  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IS-F 'Ring video

Enjoy :

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...deoID=20108483
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 10:16 AM
  #71  
sdbrandon
Lead Lap
 
sdbrandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mavericck
What do you mean not compete directly with the M, S/RS, and AMG? That is exactly what the IS-F is meant to do. That's exactly what the IS, GS, and LS were meant to do.
Don't see it that way. Lexus is very conservative which consistently holds them back. Unless they get more agrressive in design, push the technology envelope more, etc. they will have a hard time competing with MB and BMW. Sure they will sell cars to those moving up from Toyota and such. However, I don't see them taking business away from BMW or MB, but rather from other Japanese brands.

To me a Lexus, Mercedes, and BMW are three different cars. It comes down to which one you like best. However, they do not compare much.

I remember back in the 90's, it seemed every car was a Maxima. People grew tired of driving the same car as everyone else. That is why a manufacturer like Toyota may sell more cars than anyone else, however, the market share will always remain low. People get bored and they will get bored with any car and desire something different.

Talk to friends a coworkers about Lexus. The name suggests luxury sedans which is the mold they created for themselves and will be very hard to get out of.

Ultimately it is the consumer who decides which cars compete, not a car company.

Last edited by sdbrandon; 01-11-07 at 10:32 AM.
sdbrandon is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 11:29 AM
  #72  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
Softer suspension? Have you ever driven an IS350 with sport package? Would you call that soft? And compared to an IS350 Sport Package, the IS-F will have a stiffer, lower, and flatter suspension.

How does it handle poorly? Can you specifically elaborate on this point? Does it lack sporty FEEL, or does it objectively handle poorly?

Would you classify the IS350 as "performance car"? For instance, 0 - 60 in 4.9 sec, 1/4 mile in 13.5 sec, and a faster slalom time than either the new G35 or the TL-S, as recorded by R & T.

Is a "performance car" defined only by a sporty feel, objectively strong performance numbers, or both? Is then a Civic Si or a Mini Cooper S a "performance car"? Is the G35 a "performance car"?

It appears many enthusiasts, including some on ClubLexus, change their definition of what a "performance car" is to favour their arguments in a certain context.
I agree totally.

Sporty FEEL and actual OBJECTIVE handling data(track times, slalom times) can be totally different things.
natnut is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 11:34 AM
  #73  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I suspect that Toyota doesn't WANT to produce a hard-edged handle-at-all-costs sports sedan rather than it CAN'T.

It has literally billions of reserves to throw at automotive engineering research.

The only question is : does it want to spend the money to produce a world-beating suspension/chassis? Does it think that its target market will embrace such a deviation from its current philosophy?

It's a matter of will, not capability.
natnut is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 11:46 AM
  #74  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
The only question is : does it want to spend the money to produce a world-beating suspension/chassis? Does it think that its target market will embrace such a deviation from its current philosophy?
From a business standpoint, if you market to the 80% of people that buy sedans and SUVs for everyday driving, and (unfortunately) not primarily focus on the 20% of people that buy cars for speed and performance, the business will still be "profitable."

However, times change, market demands fluctuate, and technology is innovated. Toyota needs to spend money on an aggresive suspension/chassis design for a sports sedan/coupe, but it does not need to make it a "world-beating" design...
PhilipMSPT is offline  
Old 01-11-07, 06:27 PM
  #75  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guys again, M is almost 3 decades old, if more than that.
F is 3 days old

Lets just be happy Lexus has joined the party.
The same people that are saying "F" is crap, probably though "LEXUS" was crap in 1989....
 


Quick Reply: How does the "F" series compete with the "M"



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.