Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Infiniti more dangerous than Lexus says BMW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-07, 01:03 PM
  #31  
Hypnotik
Lead Lap
 
Hypnotik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
It is a good thing that BMW actually acknowledges Lexus instead of ignoring them.

Rest assured, the F line of Lexus cars will bring a whole new group of buyers into the Lexus brand.

I find it strange though that a BMW representattive would make such a statement against Infiniti, considering the limited brand appeal they have in North America and worldwide (more limited than Lexus). Not only that, but he fails to mention how important BMW's image and brand name is, and a lot of people will simply ignore or not even look at Infiniti, just based on price.

The luxury car market functions differently than the mainstream car market. With Lexus models moving closer in price to BMW and Benz, as well as the Lexus lineup expanding, the Lexus brand image is growing.
The fact that BMW even acknowledged the infiniti name means that infiniti is doing something right and is becoming more known in the luxury world. Infiniti doesnt even exist in all markets in the world yet and BMW is worried. Perception seems to be changing pretty fast. Very good thing for infiniti imo
Hypnotik is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 01:06 PM
  #32  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mavericck
You need to take a re-look at your accounting book there Bean, Porsche has the highest proft margin of any manufacturer with BMW close behind them. Porsche is the worlds most profitable auto manufacturer per unit.
You're mostly correct...I would modify your statement slightly to say that Porsche is perhaps the world's most profitable mass-producer of cars (even in spite of sky-high labor prices and low productivity in German factories).

But......there's a reason for that. Porsche vehicles, for the most part, are simply overpriced, brand-new, for what they offer, especially compared to many of their competitiors. They can be great buys, though, when they are a couple of years old and have depreciated some.

But as brand-new cars, IMO they are grossly overpriced. For instance, the brand-new Porsche Boxster I reviewed a few weeks ago, at $48,000, IMO did not offer substantially more for the money than a $35,000 Honda S2000. And it offered little more driving fun than a $24,000 Miata that is literally half the price. Yes, Porsches have great sheet metal, excellent paint jobs, and plenty of power, but still IMO are overpriced.

OK.....sorry....I know I got off topic, but just wanted to make that ppint.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-15-07 at 01:13 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 01:07 PM
  #33  
Hypnotik
Lead Lap
 
Hypnotik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Is Infiniti only marketed to North America only? Or is it global?
Infiniti is marketed in North America, Canada, Taiwan, the middle east, Korea, Russia, china
Hypnotik is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 01:54 PM
  #34  
JZA80MHU38
Lead Lap
 
JZA80MHU38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
But......there's a reason for that. Porsche vehicles, for the most part, are simply overpriced, brand-new, for what they offer, especially compared to many of their competitiors. They can be great buys, though, when they are a couple of years old and have depreciated some.
If Porsche are "simply overpriced", then the demand should drop like crazy, right? How can they still be the most profitable car manufacturer in the world then?

Also, if you think a company can "simply" make money by overpricing their cars, then why don't Toyota and Lexus do so?
JZA80MHU38 is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:38 PM
  #35  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JZA80MHU38
If Porsche are "simply overpriced", then the demand should drop like crazy, right? How can they still be the most profitable car manufacturer in the world then?
No, not necessarily. Porsche-o-Philes, high price or not, are dedicated people. I have a friend who ordered one of the original, first-year Boxsters in March 1997. He waited thirteen months for the car without complaining....and paid a dealer mark-up as well. Took delivery in April 1998, despite a second new assembly plant for Boxsters built in Finland at the time.
The car was technically over a year old when he got it, which ordinarily would have cut into its value except for the terrific demand for early Boxsters. When you market and sell to people like that, you can charge high prices......and get them. Demand will not drop.


Also, if you think a company can "simply" make money by overpricing their cars, then why don't Toyota and Lexus do so?
The basic answer is that Toyota gets terrific competition from Honda, Subaru, and Hyundai in building low-priced, reliable vehicles. Subaru, of course, sells only AWD vehicles in the American market, but the other companies dig right at Toyota's heels in both the 2WD and AWD categories.
Hyundai, in many ways, is rapidly becoming the new Toyota...they are not yet as big as Toyota, but are now producing vehicles of Toyota/Honda build quality ( yes, I'm serious ) with lower prices and longer warranties.....prices and warranties that Japanese manufacturers, except for Suzuki, as yet cannot equal....and Suzuki's American-market passenger cars, ironically, are mostly Korean ( Daewoo) built too.

Also, another factor in this class of vehicles is the fact that, unlike many Porsche-o-Philes and BMW junkies, entry-level vehicle buyers are not necesarily die-hards. They have shown a remarkable tendency to gravitate to other makes if they produce comparable quality at lower prices.....a major reason for Hyundai's huge rise in the last several years.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-15-07 at 03:40 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:47 PM
  #36  
JZA80MHU38
Lead Lap
 
JZA80MHU38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In a nutshell, Porsche is not overpriced. At least Adam Smith will agree.
JZA80MHU38 is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 02:49 PM
  #37  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JZA80MHU38
In a nutshell, Porsche is not overpriced. At least Adam Smith will agree.
Yes and no. It is not necessarily overpriced if you look at it from a purely capitalist market and demand standpoint. It most definitely IS when you look at value for the money.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:00 PM
  #38  
JZA80MHU38
Lead Lap
 
JZA80MHU38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yes and no. It is not necessarily overpriced if you look at it from a purely capitalist market and demand standpoint. It most definitely IS when you look at value for the money.
Value is an individual perspective. One may think it's not worth it (personal opinion), or one just can't afford it (personal financial situation), but it doesn't mean that particular product is overpriced (big picture).
JZA80MHU38 is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:04 PM
  #39  
xioix
Racer

 
xioix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so. cal
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrUnBiased
Actually, Porsche owns that title.
No, Porsche makes more money per car sold than Toyota, but Toyota makes the most money of any car manufacturer in the world, and is one of the most profitable companies around
xioix is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 03:06 PM
  #40  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I love Porsches but they are very overpriced. I mean for what 20hp, you have to order an over $15,000 package on the 911. The Boxster and 996 911 shared I think 40% of its parts. Hell both front ends WERE THE SAME to save money. This was NOT passed on to consumers for the most part. The Cayman S can be optioned to over 70k with NO issues.
The Boxster/911/Cayman have the SAME interiors. The Cayman/Boxster gets what, oval vents to differentiate themselves.
The crazier thing is THE MORE YOU PAY, the more sameness you get. a 911 Turbo interior has basically identical to a basic 911.
The GT2 is the most expensive 911, and guess what, they TAKE AWAY the AWD system!
Yeah they get different wings, different suspensions and crazily, they can make 911s drive like different cars.

And now the brand is so HOT, people will pay anything.

I mean I have a HUGE respect and love for Porsche but value and price/power is not one of their selling points!
 
Old 01-15-07, 05:21 PM
  #41  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mavericck
You need to take a re-look at your accounting book there Bean, Porsche has the highest proft margin of any manufacturer with BMW close behind them. Yes Toyota may have more assets and make more money in total, but thats because they just sell more vehicles and are a much bigger company. Porsche is the worlds most profitable auto manufacturer per unit.
Actually, Toyota has higher profit margin than BMW. And we are not talking about Lexus, but global Toyota, with millions of Yaris's, Corolla's and Camry's sold. Thats for 2006 fiscal year.

Porsche has bigger profit margin than Toyota, but Porsche is considerably more luxurios and premium brand than BMW or Lexus, let alone Toyota. They probably make 70x less cars than Toyota.
spwolf is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 06:05 PM
  #42  
rcracer_tx
Driver
 
rcracer_tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: texas
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrUnBiased
Who is in second place here? Last I checked, BMW was the number one (#1) selling luxury car manufacturer in the world. I've done the math before in another thread.... Even if you take away 1-series, 3-series and Mini sales away from BMW, they still outsell Lexus worldwide.

World>U.S.
You are aware that Lexus branding is only sold to a small part of the world, right? Most of the world, Lexus is marketed as a Toyota. Example: Lexus SC series is a Toyota Soarer almost everywhere except America.

Originally Posted by mmarshall

But as brand-new cars, IMO they are grossly overpriced. For instance, the brand-new Porsche Boxster I reviewed a few weeks ago, at $48,000, IMO did not offer substantially more for the money than a $35,000 Honda S2000. And it offered little more driving fun than a $24,000 Miata that is literally half the price. Yes, Porsches have great sheet metal, excellent paint jobs, and plenty of power, but still IMO are overpriced.

OK.....sorry....I know I got off topic, but just wanted to make that ppint.
Power isn't everything, Take the Boxster S to a slalom course, its has amazing handling, and it will beat the Ferrari Enzo. Also, The Boxster is far superior in terms of quality compared to an s2000 or miata.

And on another note, BMW might be one of the top sellers, but they couldn't even make the top ten list in terms of reliability, What a POS.
rcracer_tx is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 06:07 PM
  #43  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by rcracer_tx
You are aware that Lexus branding is only sold to a small part of the world, right? Most of the world, Lexus is marketed as a Toyota. Example: Lexus SC series is a Toyota Soarer almost everywhere except America.

.
Sorry dude its the other way around, Lexus is Lexus everywhere EXCEPT in Japan and I think Australia. Everywhere else, it pretty much was Lexus.
 
Old 01-15-07, 06:09 PM
  #44  
insider
Pole Position
 
insider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NV
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course BMW is not worried as much about Lexus. The cars simply just do not handle well enough to compete with the BMW. Lexus as been around over ten years and still can't get a decent handling car. The IS350 just handles poorly compared to the BMW. Infiniti, on the other hand, does offer a nice handling car, like the BMW. So I can see why BMW made that statement.
insider is offline  
Old 01-15-07, 06:16 PM
  #45  
JZA80MHU38
Lead Lap
 
JZA80MHU38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Sorry dude its the other way around, Lexus is Lexus everywhere EXCEPT in Japan and I think Australia. Everywhere else, it pretty much was Lexus.
This is not completely correct. In certain countries/regions Lexus doesn't carry all the models like they do in the US, so the local "grey market" dealers will carry the Toyota products. For example, before Crown Motor (the distributor for Toyota/Lexus in HK) import the Lexus badged SC430, some other dealers are importing the Soarers. Those dealers also had Harrier Hybrid before Crown imported the Lexus badged RX400h
JZA80MHU38 is offline  


Quick Reply: Infiniti more dangerous than Lexus says BMW



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:34 PM.