Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Japanese cars = low torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-07, 12:12 PM
  #1  
freddymoo
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
freddymoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: va
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Japanese cars = low torque

why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?
freddymoo is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 12:15 PM
  #2  
IS_Mine
Lexus Test Driver
 
IS_Mine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you were looking for a Jap car NA that was a torque monster I think you were in the wrong market to begin with. :P

Besides this will just raise the argument between torque amount vs horse power.

Is your car made for crusing or are you going to the track? Because really, you only need massive amounts of torque if you're going from a dig. It helps you get off the line! Maybe you like torque because you like to be thrown back in your chair.. but for whatever reason! If you are buying a car for torque this is the wrong market for you! Unless you turbo charge an I6 :P
IS_Mine is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 12:39 PM
  #3  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by freddymoo
why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?
Can you post some specific examples? What cars, or better yet, what engines are you comparing? I think you'll find that if you compare C.I. to C.I. the Japanese engines come out ahead in HP AND torque.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 12:46 PM
  #4  
GNN60GT500
Driver
 
GNN60GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by freddymoo
why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?
I smell a troll-

I dont know why- why is the Earth round?

Why do I perfer skinny girls to fat ones?

Why do BMWs have to break down so much?

If you want torque, the only real place to get it is via a Muscle Car or REAL Sports car- (Lambo, Ferrari exc exc)

All sports/luxury/ blah blah blah - basically

the only car in this segment with real torque is the CTS-V

335, IS350, G35, A4 they all pretty much suck if you are just looking for the car with the most torque

Maybe the Japanese are looking at one side, the sales side of a famous quote-

Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races

- Carroll Shelby
GNN60GT500 is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 12:52 PM
  #5  
Reyngel
Lead Lap
 
Reyngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by freddymoo
why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?


Three things:

1. Nice try, troll.

2. To humor you with a response, Japanese cars don't have low torque. They just typically have it higher in the rev range as opposed the typical low-end torque of American cars.

3. The term "Jap" isn't very appropriate. It's actually pretty offensive.
Reyngel is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 01:25 PM
  #6  
insider
Pole Position
 
insider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NV
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps he's refering to the BMW 335i with its 300 ft.lbs of torque at only 1,400 rpm?
insider is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 01:33 PM
  #7  
ElitistK
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
ElitistK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by freddymoo
why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?

torque = displacement. most japanese cars have smaller displacements compared to euro and domestic engines. But then again, domestic engines are OHV, which allows them to have big displacement within a rather small physical engine space. But either way, i smell a troll.

Originally Posted by GNN60GT500

Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races

- Carroll Shelby
torque alone isn't a winning factor. you have to account for aerodynamics, gearing, hp, weight, suspension setup, and most important of all, tires.

Last edited by ElitistK; 04-14-07 at 01:38 PM.
ElitistK is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 01:55 PM
  #8  
Gtidan
Lead Lap
 
Gtidan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by insider
Perhaps he's referring to the BMW 335i with its 300 ft.lbs of torque at only 1,400 rpm?
Car & Driver......
3-SERIES COUPE
Vehicle type: front-engine, rear- or 4-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe
Base price: $35,995-$41,295
Engines: DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter inline-6, 230 hp, 200 lb-ft; twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter inline-6, 300 hp, 300 lb-ft

So lets see here. BMWs 3.0 liter kicks out 230 and 200 lb-ft.

My IS250 2.5 liter (not 3.0 liter) or 31 cubic inches LESS than the BMW puts out 204 hp and 185 lb-ft. Sounds to me like Lexus knows what their doing here.

Is it fair to compare a TWIN TURBO's torque with a normally aspirated engine? Maybe to the Motor Trend comic book group....I don't know
Gtidan is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 01:59 PM
  #9  
IS2Fizzle
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
 
IS2Fizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by insider
Perhaps he's refering to the BMW 335i with its 300 ft.lbs of torque at only 1,400 rpm?
you gotta come up with a better one than that because the 335i puts down the power at 1400 rpm with boost. I believe the guys talking about all motor.
IS2Fizzle is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 02:03 PM
  #10  
STIG
Lexus Test Driver
 
STIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by freddymoo
why do J cars always lack behind in the torque dept? from their v4 to v6 and now upcoming v8 models?

they can increase their hps to match their american/euro rivals, however they always seem to be behind in the Torque?

is it their engineering/design?
And when did Japaneses start making V4 motors?
STIG is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 03:10 PM
  #11  
socalJD
Lexus Champion
 
socalJD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STIG
And when did Japaneses start making V4 motors?
You'd have to look b/w your legs when straddling the appropriate Honda, Kawasaki or Suzuki . . .
socalJD is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 03:50 PM
  #12  
STIG
Lexus Test Driver
 
STIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 6,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by socalJD
You'd have to look b/w your legs when straddling the appropriate Honda, Kawasaki or Suzuki . . .
you are right. How could I forgot about it?

The OP is right, those V4s are really weak in tq department.
STIG is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 03:54 PM
  #13  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

07 tundra V8 makes 'enough' hp & tq.
newr is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 03:56 PM
  #14  
GRAND_LS 4
3UZ-FEEEE
iTrader: (2)
 
GRAND_LS 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 6,253
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Lets keep the discussion civil please.
GRAND_LS 4 is offline  
Old 04-14-07, 04:02 PM
  #15  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,273
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS350jet
Can you post some specific examples? What cars, or better yet, what engines are you comparing? I think you'll find that if you compare C.I. to C.I. the Japanese engines come out ahead in HP AND torque.
Drive a Mitsubishi Evo if you want a Japanese-designed machine with torque.
I promise you...even with AWD, that little 4-cylinder turbo will get out of its own way, especialy as RPM's build.

Other Japanese-designed vehicles with good torque and acceleration are the Nissan 350Z and Subaru STi.

If you are looking for low-end torque, I would suggest avoiding Honda and Toyota-designed designed VTEC fours. They are generally the opposite...little torque throughout the RPM range and mostly high-end HP.

If you are looking for Japanese truck-type torque for hauling and carying heavy loads, the Tundra's new 5.7 L I-Force V8, with 401 ft.-lbs. of torque at fairly low RPM should fit the bill nicely.

Last edited by mmarshall; 04-14-07 at 04:11 PM.
mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: Japanese cars = low torque



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 AM.