UPDATE: thecarconnection.com's First Drive of Lexus LS600hL(+Edmunds Full Test)
#106
Guest
Posts: n/a
Okay so I got to thinking here b/c I am seeing the 600h L getting the "its not worth it" treatment.
So lets look at some other "top of the range" cars and well,"are they worth it". I'll post a couple and what reviwers thought.
BMW M6-the most expensive or 2nd most expsensive BMW, offers no performance advantage over the M6 coupe. It is 4400lbs. A cloth top convert. 4400 lbs. No hardtop. A coupe with a cloth top. BMW builds it b/c its a "halo" car, a M6 convert. They wont build or sell many but its there.
Reviews have been average at best in EVO, CAR etc.
SL 65- I personally think its an incredible car. Sports Car International could not understand why you need this over the SL 55. They said its almost undrivable. THey took it to the track and could not get the car to launch with the stock tires. Benz won't sell many, won't build many. Its a "HALO" car for Mercedes and the AMG brand.
Porsche 911 (996) GT2-Top of the 911 range. You pay $180,000, you lose the AWD, you lose the electronic gadgets, you keep the turbos. So your paying MORE for LESS. Reviews were average at best. It sold okay. It did provide a "halo" for the 911 range, this was the untamed "beast", a true 911 where you are not always in control.
There are others, those are examples I can think of off the top of my head. I've read on forums where of course:
M6 coupe owners
SL 55 owners
911 Turbo or GT3 owners
State "its not worth it" and their reasons behind it. Thing is, someone DOES find them "worth it" as the cars sell. No matter if its to race or just drive around and be seen in, they are the BEST of that range.
The Lexus LS 600h L may not appeal to traditional Lexus buyers. Guess what, its not SUPPOSED to!!! Reading what Lexus has stated, it is for a new kind of Lexus buyer.
The LS 460 and LS 460L are more in tune with traditional and loyal Lexus owners.
The previous Lexus GM stated "we have to expand in new areas, while trying to also please current and loyal buyers".
Lexus rarely, RARELY ever has a miss. We might not like all of their offerings but someone usually does. Lexus had their top engineers and managment working on the 600h L.
I am confident they know a lot more than I do!
So lets look at some other "top of the range" cars and well,"are they worth it". I'll post a couple and what reviwers thought.
BMW M6-the most expensive or 2nd most expsensive BMW, offers no performance advantage over the M6 coupe. It is 4400lbs. A cloth top convert. 4400 lbs. No hardtop. A coupe with a cloth top. BMW builds it b/c its a "halo" car, a M6 convert. They wont build or sell many but its there.
Reviews have been average at best in EVO, CAR etc.
SL 65- I personally think its an incredible car. Sports Car International could not understand why you need this over the SL 55. They said its almost undrivable. THey took it to the track and could not get the car to launch with the stock tires. Benz won't sell many, won't build many. Its a "HALO" car for Mercedes and the AMG brand.
Porsche 911 (996) GT2-Top of the 911 range. You pay $180,000, you lose the AWD, you lose the electronic gadgets, you keep the turbos. So your paying MORE for LESS. Reviews were average at best. It sold okay. It did provide a "halo" for the 911 range, this was the untamed "beast", a true 911 where you are not always in control.
There are others, those are examples I can think of off the top of my head. I've read on forums where of course:
M6 coupe owners
SL 55 owners
911 Turbo or GT3 owners
State "its not worth it" and their reasons behind it. Thing is, someone DOES find them "worth it" as the cars sell. No matter if its to race or just drive around and be seen in, they are the BEST of that range.
The Lexus LS 600h L may not appeal to traditional Lexus buyers. Guess what, its not SUPPOSED to!!! Reading what Lexus has stated, it is for a new kind of Lexus buyer.
The LS 460 and LS 460L are more in tune with traditional and loyal Lexus owners.
The previous Lexus GM stated "we have to expand in new areas, while trying to also please current and loyal buyers".
Lexus rarely, RARELY ever has a miss. We might not like all of their offerings but someone usually does. Lexus had their top engineers and managment working on the 600h L.
I am confident they know a lot more than I do!
#107
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's really just a preference of the company and what their marketing departments think will work best.
Could Lexus made an IS with basic economy motor and spartan equipment? Yes. Would they? Depends if they think it would sell well enough to risk tarnishing their image as a 'high end only' nameplate. Instead they sell the Camry for cheap and then draw the line somewhere between that and the ES and don't allow for much overlap.
Could Lexus made an IS with basic economy motor and spartan equipment? Yes. Would they? Depends if they think it would sell well enough to risk tarnishing their image as a 'high end only' nameplate. Instead they sell the Camry for cheap and then draw the line somewhere between that and the ES and don't allow for much overlap.
There is no cheap 4 cylinder IS (in America)b/c Lexus research indicates 4 cylinder and luxury brand in America= cheap and "avoid like the plague".
Clearly BMW and Benz got that memo as they stopped selling us 4 cylinder cars as well.
Europe is a different story but I cannot hold a A2 or 1-series in high regard I don't care if it has a Rolls Royce badge, its Corolla competition.
#108
Lexus Champion
Why would you expect the convertible version of the same car to perform any better? You're only paying for the convertible top and required enhancements to the chassis.
#109
Okay so I got to thinking here b/c I am seeing the 600h L getting the "its not worth it" treatment.
So lets look at some other "top of the range" cars and well,"are they worth it". I'll post a couple and what reviwers thought.
BMW M6-the most expensive or 2nd most expsensive BMW, offers no performance advantage over the M6 coupe. It is 4400lbs. A cloth top convert. 4400 lbs. No hardtop. A coupe with a cloth top. BMW builds it b/c its a "halo" car, a M6 convert. They wont build or sell many but its there.
Reviews have been average at best in EVO, CAR etc.
So lets look at some other "top of the range" cars and well,"are they worth it". I'll post a couple and what reviwers thought.
BMW M6-the most expensive or 2nd most expsensive BMW, offers no performance advantage over the M6 coupe. It is 4400lbs. A cloth top convert. 4400 lbs. No hardtop. A coupe with a cloth top. BMW builds it b/c its a "halo" car, a M6 convert. They wont build or sell many but its there.
Reviews have been average at best in EVO, CAR etc.
SL 65- I personally think its an incredible car. Sports Car International could not understand why you need this over the SL 55. They said its almost undrivable. THey took it to the track and could not get the car to launch with the stock tires. Benz won't sell many, won't build many. Its a "HALO" car for Mercedes and the AMG brand.
Porsche 911 (996) GT2-Top of the 911 range. You pay $180,000, you lose the AWD, you lose the electronic gadgets, you keep the turbos. So your paying MORE for LESS. Reviews were average at best. It sold okay. It did provide a "halo" for the 911 range, this was the untamed "beast", a true 911 where you are not always in control.
State "its not worth it" and their reasons behind it. Thing is, someone DOES find them "worth it" as the cars sell. No matter if its to race or just drive around and be seen in, they are the BEST of that range.
I do not feel the examples you gave were the best examples out there. A convertible vs. a coupe? Isn't that a clear difference between the cars? Someone wants a drop top. Okay, that makes sense. Why does someone by a convertible M6? To put the top down. Why does someone buy a SL65 compared to a SL55? To boast, hey I have a gazillion more HP than you. Fine. Why does someone buy a Hybrid? To get better gas mileage.
Lexus rarely, RARELY ever has a miss. We might not like all of their offerings but someone usually does. Lexus had their top engineers and managment working on the 600h L.
Last edited by OC 335d; 04-24-07 at 03:14 PM.
#110
Competition would indicate people cross-shopping the two. I couldn't imagine cross shopping an A2/1 series vs. a Corolla. I absolutely hate the way the Corolla drives. I'd take a Civic anyday.
#111
Lexus Champion
I think 'not worth it' is stemming from the fact that Lexus added a LOT of weight, a LOT of complexity, and a LOT of extra cost and it appears to not perform much, if any better than the regular ol' LS460 both in acceleration and in fuel economy. I've always heard all the way along that the LS600h wasn't going to be about fuel economy as it was going to be about "V12 performance with V8 economy". Well, I just don't see V12 performance here. Do you?
I'm sure off idle response tooling around town is a little more satisfying due to the torque from the electric motor at lower rpms, but really, is that all V12 performance means?
I'm sure off idle response tooling around town is a little more satisfying due to the torque from the electric motor at lower rpms, but really, is that all V12 performance means?
#112
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
Well, won't people buy the LS600hL because of the HP difference alone?
It's not just bragging rights on having the best hybrid technology, but also having about 50 hp more than a "regular" and "common" LS. To Hell with MPG!!!
I mean, comparing it to Mercedes, there is a huge difference in status and presence between a regular MB versus an AMG version. I think people will think and feel the same when an LS600hL rolls along...
It's not just bragging rights on having the best hybrid technology, but also having about 50 hp more than a "regular" and "common" LS. To Hell with MPG!!!
I mean, comparing it to Mercedes, there is a huge difference in status and presence between a regular MB versus an AMG version. I think people will think and feel the same when an LS600hL rolls along...
#113
Phillip, I'd rather it be a 100+ hp increase w/o the Hybrid technology but that's just me. The difference in AMG to non-AMG Mercedes is a lot more than just HP increase though. But yes, people will still buy it. I haven't doubted the sales potential at all. That 50+ hp difference is negated by its considerable bloat increase though.
#114
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
I've seen people's opinions about the IS-F. I think it would have been cool to have a supercharged hybrid, but the IS-F with a 5.0L engine is more economical and intuitive for being a compact sports sedan.
"There is no replacement for displacement..."
#115
Super Moderator
The Price increase vs. performance gain comparison with the difference between the SL65 & SL55 above is relevent, just looked up these numbers from the Mercedes website :
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
The SL65 & SL600 have better interior materials than the SL55 (better leather, alcantra lining), I know some mags have tested faster times than those numbers above, but basically, the SL65 have only a very slim performance gain(about 0.2 sec. 0-60mph) over the SL600 & SL55, yet it cost a whopping $57,200 over the SL55. I would say very few people can justify such an enormous price difference over what you get extra over the SL55 & SL600.
From a Value for $ perspective, it doesn't make much sense.Those people who get the SL65 are people who can & want the exclusivity, plus the satisfaction of owning the most expensive top of line model.
Similar prices & performances numbers for the S65 vs. S600, & CL65 vs CL600 . . .
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
The SL65 & SL600 have better interior materials than the SL55 (better leather, alcantra lining), I know some mags have tested faster times than those numbers above, but basically, the SL65 have only a very slim performance gain(about 0.2 sec. 0-60mph) over the SL600 & SL55, yet it cost a whopping $57,200 over the SL55. I would say very few people can justify such an enormous price difference over what you get extra over the SL55 & SL600.
From a Value for $ perspective, it doesn't make much sense.Those people who get the SL65 are people who can & want the exclusivity, plus the satisfaction of owning the most expensive top of line model.
Similar prices & performances numbers for the S65 vs. S600, & CL65 vs CL600 . . .
#117
Lexus Fanatic
For those who don't see the point of the LS600hL vs. the LS460L, you are not comparing apples to apples until:
1. The 2008/2009 LS460L AWD is released.
2. The EPA fuel economy figures for the LS460L AWD are released.
3. Magazines known for the best acceleration times (C&D, R&T) release their test figures for the LS600hL AND the LS460L AWD.
Trust me, there WILL be a significant gain in both performance and fuel economy for the LS600hL versus the 2008/2009 LS460L AWD. We just need to wait for those figures to come in.
I wish Lexus would also release a RWD version of the LS600hL just to shut up those people who are disappointed at the acceleration performance of the LS600hL AWD versus the LS460L RWD.
1. The 2008/2009 LS460L AWD is released.
2. The EPA fuel economy figures for the LS460L AWD are released.
3. Magazines known for the best acceleration times (C&D, R&T) release their test figures for the LS600hL AND the LS460L AWD.
Trust me, there WILL be a significant gain in both performance and fuel economy for the LS600hL versus the 2008/2009 LS460L AWD. We just need to wait for those figures to come in.
I wish Lexus would also release a RWD version of the LS600hL just to shut up those people who are disappointed at the acceleration performance of the LS600hL AWD versus the LS460L RWD.
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
The Price increase vs. performance gain comparison with the difference between the SL65 & SL55 above is relevent, just looked up these numbers from the Mercedes website :
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
The SL65 & SL600 have better interior materials than the SL55 (better leather, alcantra lining), I know some mags have tested faster times than those numbers above, but basically, the SL65 have only a very slim performance gain(about 0.2 sec. 0-60mph) over the SL600 & SL55, yet it cost a whopping $57,200 over the SL55. I would say very few people can justify such an enormous price difference over what you get extra over the SL55 & SL600.
From a Value for $ perspective, it doesn't make much sense.Those people who get the SL65 are people who can & want the exclusivity, plus the satisfaction of owning the most expensive top of line model.
Similar prices & performances numbers for the S65 vs. S600, & CL65 vs CL600 . . .
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
The SL65 & SL600 have better interior materials than the SL55 (better leather, alcantra lining), I know some mags have tested faster times than those numbers above, but basically, the SL65 have only a very slim performance gain(about 0.2 sec. 0-60mph) over the SL600 & SL55, yet it cost a whopping $57,200 over the SL55. I would say very few people can justify such an enormous price difference over what you get extra over the SL55 & SL600.
From a Value for $ perspective, it doesn't make much sense.Those people who get the SL65 are people who can & want the exclusivity, plus the satisfaction of owning the most expensive top of line model.
Similar prices & performances numbers for the S65 vs. S600, & CL65 vs CL600 . . .
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Lexus hasn't gone down to making econo cars, but they are going "up-market" in price, trying to retain buyers who leave Lexus to buy the Germans as their incomes rise.
Then you tell me why its worth more money than the M6 coupe, since that is what BMW charges for it and it seems to be "fine".
#120
Lexus Champion
The Price increase vs. performance gain comparison with the difference between the SL65 & SL55 above is relevent, just looked up these numbers from the Mercedes website :
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
SL55 - base MSRP $129,575
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510hp @ 6100rpm
531 lb-ft @ 2600-4000 rpm
SL600 base msrp $132.775
0-60 mph - 4.4 sec.
510 hp @5000 rpm
612 lb.-ft @ 1900-3500 rpm
SL65 base msrp $186,775
0-60 mph - 4.2 sec.
604 hp @4800 rpm
738 lb-ft. @ 2000-4000 rpm
Post 1/4-mile times, 0-150 times, track times, etc - that's where you will appreciate the extra power of the SL65.
If Lexus comes out with a convertible IS and charges more for it, I don't think anyone here including me or you is going to be surprised that they are charging more for it.
It's not necessarily "better" - that's just a question of preference - do you like open air driving or would you just rather save your 5 grand and get the coupe?