350z - not impressed
#61
I can somewhat relate. I was in my friend's Infiniti G35C auto and under 4k RPM, it felt slow. Lots of noise with no speed. But once you get over 4k RPM, the G35C is very quick.
I also test drove an IS300 a few months back. Below 4k RPM, the IS300 feels strong/torquey. I can see why the OP thinks the 350z is slower; given the fact that the torque gives you that feeling that you're going fast. However, Once the IS300 passes 4k RPM, it feels like it's huffing and puffing just to get to redline.
I also test drove an IS300 a few months back. Below 4k RPM, the IS300 feels strong/torquey. I can see why the OP thinks the 350z is slower; given the fact that the torque gives you that feeling that you're going fast. However, Once the IS300 passes 4k RPM, it feels like it's huffing and puffing just to get to redline.
#62
i was talking about an apple to apple comparison of soft top 350Z vs soft top S2k
anyone got some race results? id love to see a race btwn the 2 on the track (not a strip)
I can somewhat relate. I was in my friend's Infiniti G35C auto and under 4k RPM, it felt slow. Lots of noise with no speed. But once you get over 4k RPM, the G35C is very quick.
I also test drove an IS300 a few months back. Below 4k RPM, the IS300 feels strong/torquey. I can see why the OP thinks the 350z is slower; given the fact that the torque gives you that feeling that you're going fast. However, Once the IS300 passes 4k RPM, it feels like it's huffing and puffing just to get to redline.
I also test drove an IS300 a few months back. Below 4k RPM, the IS300 feels strong/torquey. I can see why the OP thinks the 350z is slower; given the fact that the torque gives you that feeling that you're going fast. However, Once the IS300 passes 4k RPM, it feels like it's huffing and puffing just to get to redline.
it was nothing spectacular at the lower end
im sure the manual wouldve been much quicker once u can hold the rev to get its potential out
Last edited by UberNoob; 04-23-07 at 01:41 PM.
#63
thats the hardtop 350Z vs softtop S2K
i was talking about an apple to apple comparison of soft top 350Z vs soft top S2k
anyone got some race results? id love to see a race btwn the 2 on the track (not a strip)
thats gotta be it, when i was using tiptronic in the auto 350Z, it was limiting rev to around 4K
it was nothing spectacular at the lower end
im sure the manual wouldve been much quicker once u can hold the rev to get its potential out
i was talking about an apple to apple comparison of soft top 350Z vs soft top S2k
anyone got some race results? id love to see a race btwn the 2 on the track (not a strip)
thats gotta be it, when i was using tiptronic in the auto 350Z, it was limiting rev to around 4K
it was nothing spectacular at the lower end
im sure the manual wouldve been much quicker once u can hold the rev to get its potential out
So? The S2k weighs about 400lb less than the 350z either way.
#64
S2k weighs about 2850 lbs
350Z convertible's weighs 3550 lbs
thats about 700 lbs of difference
both measurements are curb weights
350Z coupe weighs around 3450 lbs
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2008/...le.fullTrimId=
it was the grand touring convertible that i tested
its not just the curb weight that comes into play too
body rigidity of convertibles also is an important factor when it comes to handling
350Z convertible's weighs 3550 lbs
thats about 700 lbs of difference
both measurements are curb weights
350Z coupe weighs around 3450 lbs
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2008/...le.fullTrimId=
it was the grand touring convertible that i tested
its not just the curb weight that comes into play too
body rigidity of convertibles also is an important factor when it comes to handling
#66
anyways, my point is, the 350Z i drove wouldve been slower than any S2K out there on a track
the stig needs to run these 2 cars on top gear!
#67
You can't compare a S2k to a Convertible 350z because the weight kills it. So the video above has the coupe and still beat the s2k with some of the best drivers and if you notice the driver of the 350z wasn't even trying hard as the s2k was. slow shifts, not redlining each gear, etc.
I also do not agree that a fully loaded 3400lb 350z would be slower than a S2K, because from that video it out right killed the s2k without even trying hard.
I also do not agree that a fully loaded 3400lb 350z would be slower than a S2K, because from that video it out right killed the s2k without even trying hard.
#68
S2000 will school 350Z on autox for sure, handling wise S2000 will beat the Z.
Track the Z will have more chance with straight lines
Track the Z will have more chance with straight lines
#69
Not per that video. Have you seen the best motoring test of a autox situation? The 350z still beat the s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
#70
Dont you love the Z evolution. It gradually got heavier as it changed generations. I agree with everyone else. You should test drive a stick.
I just dont like the body lines, but its performance isnt horrible. Just reserve a C7 and be done with it :P
Is that 61k CAD?
I just dont like the body lines, but its performance isnt horrible. Just reserve a C7 and be done with it :P
Is that 61k CAD?
#71
Not per that video. Have you seen the best motoring test of a autox situation? The 350z still beat the s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
S2000 is light, better balance. Not talking trash to my own car...i still love it, but it is what it is, I cant lie to myself.
#72
Not per that video. Have you seen the best motoring test of a autox situation? The 350z still beat the s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...ht=350z+vs+s2k
Originally Posted by BaTMan_4
How does that comment make sense with the vid??? That is a fully bolted Z against a basically stock S2K
How does that comment make sense with the vid??? That is a fully bolted Z against a basically stock S2K
#73
Video... no offense, being a Z owner and driven s2000 for so many times, also look up the class for the Z (bs) and S2000(as), S2000 is in higher class.
S2000 is light, better balance. Not talking trash to my own car...i still love it, but it is what it is, I cant lie to myself.
S2000 is light, better balance. Not talking trash to my own car...i still love it, but it is what it is, I cant lie to myself.
The nismo Z was faster than the amuse s2k and the porsche cayman S in the slolam and emergency lane changes by a few seconds (very significant!). The nismo Z was overalll a better car than the cayman S.
s2k might be better balanced and lighter but it doesn't have the HR engine or the VQ period.
#74
And again a s2k will not run 13.3 bone stock. or be near that without FI
#75
The nismo Z was faster than the amuse s2k and the porsche cayman S in the slolam and emergency lane changes by a few seconds (very significant!). The nismo Z was overalll a better car than the cayman S.
s2k might be better balanced and lighter but it doesn't have the HR engine or the VQ period.
s2k might be better balanced and lighter but it doesn't have the HR engine or the VQ period.
Back to the topic is, to test drive the 6speeds and see if she thinks the Z still not impressing her.