Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Review: 2007 BMW X3 3.0si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-07, 09:13 PM
  #16  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Current gen RAV4 Sport/Limited V6 AWD > X3....

In almost every conceivable manner
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 03:34 AM
  #17  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,173
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
Current gen RAV4 Sport/Limited V6 AWD > X3....

In almost every conceivable manner
Good thing you said "almost". The RAV4, I'll agree, is a better value for the money, and far more reliable. But its power steering, transmission shifter, and chassis dynamics cannot compare to BMW's. Next to the X3, the RAV4 feels like a minivan....it even has a 3rd-row seat like one now.

Don't get me wrong. The RAV4 is an excellent vehicle for what it designed for, and if I had to depend on one every day, reliability-wise, to get me to work and back, I'd probably choose it (or a Honda CR-V) over any BMW product. But...on a twisty road, you have to sample and feel BMW's steering to believe it. There's just nothing like it, despite a little more body roll in the X3 than the X5.

Last edited by mmarshall; 05-12-07 at 03:43 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 05:35 AM
  #18  
ff_
Lexus Champion
 
ff_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Opposite-shift pattern from most cars.
Are you referring to the fact that reverse is "up and to the left"? After having owned 2 BMWs, I've decided that in my mind, this is where reverse should be. The first car I owned after the BMWs was the S2000, and immediately (and from then on) I wished that the Honda gearbox was set up the same.


Originally Posted by MR_F1
Current gen RAV4 Sport/Limited V6 AWD > X3....

In almost every conceivable manner
As far as FWD econo-cute-utes go, the Rav4 V6 is probably at the top of the pack. But to say that it's better than the X3 in almost every conceivable way... I doubt that comment is even close to true.

Last edited by ff_; 05-12-07 at 06:10 AM.
ff_ is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 06:56 AM
  #19  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,173
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ff_
Are you referring to the fact that reverse is "up and to the left"? After having owned 2 BMWs, I've decided that in my mind, this is where reverse should be. The first car I owned after the BMWs was the S2000, and immediately (and from then on) I wished that the Honda gearbox was set up the same.
No. With automatics and automanuals, Reverse is ALWAYS at the top...right below Park. That is a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Law for quadrant standardization....P-R-N-D-Lower gears. It dates back to the 1960's.

What I was refering to was the automanual sport-shift gate. With most vehicles, you bump the lever forward to upshift, back to downshift (or left/right with the Chrysler and Mercedes Autosticks). With BMW and Mazda products, you do the opposite...bump the lever forward to downshift, back to upshift. Obviously, if you are not used to this pattern, you can easily redline the engine, so you have to be careful for awhile.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 08:06 AM
  #20  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ff_
As far as FWD econo-cute-utes go, the Rav4 V6 is probably at the top of the pack. But to say that it's better than the X3 in almost every conceivable way... I doubt that comment is even close to true.

please see mmarshals post. The only place that this BMW bests the toyota is in driving dynamics. Notice I specified V6 AWD.
You will also note that the rav is faster to 0-60 and gets equal or better mileage. This is what matters in the real world for this type of vehicle, I don't see ppl taking their cute-utes to the track, so lets not get into the handling thing. I'm sure all the soccer moms out there just love to do the slalom and see how much g's they can pull on the skid pad.
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 08:31 AM
  #21  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
No. With automatics and automanuals, Reverse is ALWAYS at the top...right below Park. That is a Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Law for quadrant standardization....P-R-N-D-Lower gears. It dates back to the 1960's.

What I was refering to was the automanual sport-shift gate. With most vehicles, you bump the lever forward to upshift, back to downshift (or left/right with the Chrysler and Mercedes Autosticks). With BMW and Mazda products, you do the opposite...bump the lever forward to downshift, back to upshift. Obviously, if you are not used to this pattern, you can easily redline the engine, so you have to be careful for awhile.
You are correct about this.. When I use the steptronic, I tend to forget that forward is to downshift and back is to upshift.. I like that fact that you can shift through all the gears, unlike the GS4 which locks out 1st gear.. The vehicle also feels more lively in sport drive.
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 09:48 AM
  #22  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Now, considering the fact that for the price you can have an excellent MDX, does X3 even make sense?
The lease rates on the X3 are FAR superior to the MDX if you're looking at leasing. So much so that a 45k sticker MDX would probably cost you almost a 40% premium over a 45k X3.
Threxx is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 09:50 AM
  #23  
AzNMpower
Lead Lap
 
AzNMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Don't compare the Toyota Rav4 to the BMW X3. They're in different classes.

BMWs are rarely the "best value" or "best bang for you buck". However, if dollars and numbers are all you care about, there are plenty of vehicles out there that look great on paper, but overall just don't do much more than provide transportation. And I don't know about some of you, but I don't see a vehicle's purpose solely as "to get from A to B".
AzNMpower is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 10:20 AM
  #24  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,173
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DASHOCKER
You are correct about this.. When I use the steptronic, I tend to forget that forward is to downshift and back is to upshift.. I like that fact that you can shift through all the gears, unlike the GS4 which locks out 1st gear.. The vehicle also feels more lively in sport drive.
The most likely reason that the GS400 doesn't allow manual downshifts into first (my IS300 didn't either) is to keep overzealous drivers from putting it way down into first at too high an RPM and either redlining the engine or giving the whole drivetrain a serious jolt, which, of course, doesn't do the transmission, driveline, differential, or universal joints any good.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 10:47 AM
  #25  
ff_
Lexus Champion
 
ff_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
please see mmarshals post. The only place that this BMW bests the toyota is in driving dynamics.
I'll bet that I could test drive and examine both, and come up a nice list of qualities in the X3 that are more/better than the RAV4. Of course, I look a lot deeper than just HP or number of seats and cupholders.

I just don't see these 2 vehicles being in the same league, any more than the Camry and 3 Series would be.
ff_ is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 11:09 AM
  #26  
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DASHOCKER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The most likely reason that the GS400 doesn't allow manual downshifts into first (my IS300 didn't either) is to keep overzealous drivers from putting it way down into first at too high an RPM and either redlining the engine or giving the whole drivetrain a serious jolt, which, of course, doesn't do the transmission, driveline, differential, or universal joints any good.
True... One feature of the tranny in the X3 and other BMW models equipped with steptronic, is that in auto sport mode, when you are driving enthusiastically and release the gas pedal for a second, the transmission holds the current gear instead of automatically down shifting.. This is common with the E55 AMG Mercedes..
DASHOCKER is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 01:46 PM
  #27  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AzNMpower
Don't compare the Toyota Rav4 to the BMW X3. They're in different classes.

BMWs are rarely the "best value" or "best bang for you buck". However, if dollars and numbers are all you care about, there are plenty of vehicles out there that look great on paper, but overall just don't do much more than provide transportation. And I don't know about some of you, but I don't see a vehicle's purpose solely as "to get from A to B".
Its obvious that they are in different "classes" (though not by much....how much more doen market will BMW go? ) and I'm not talking about value. I'm claiming the RAV is a better overall vehicle. Not that you'd catch me buying either of them, and if you see a vehicles purpose as other than to solely to get from "A to B", you wouldn't be looking at this class of vehicle either.
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 06:14 PM
  #28  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ff_
I'll bet that I could test drive and examine both, and come up a nice list of qualities in the X3 that are more/better than the RAV4. Of course, I look a lot deeper than just HP or number of seats and cupholders.

I just don't see these 2 vehicles being in the same league, any more than the Camry and 3 Series would be.

Welp, I personally believe that Camry V6 is much superior to BMW 330.
Och is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 07:07 PM
  #29  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Welp, I personally believe that Camry V6 is much superior to BMW 330.
LOL

Threxx is offline  
Old 05-12-07, 07:18 PM
  #30  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
LOL

Faster, more powerful, bigger, better built, more reliable, better value.
Och is offline  


Quick Reply: Review: 2007 BMW X3 3.0si



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.