Hartley Enterprises' Haybusa-derived 2.8L V8 (400HP+!!)
#1
Hartley Enterprises' Haybusa-derived 2.8L V8 (400HP+!!)
Hartley Enterprises' Haybusa-derived 2.8L V8
Posted May 19th 2007 11:16AM by Stuart Waterman
If four's good, then eight must be better - that's the idea behind this jewel-like V8 engine built by Hartley Enterprises from two Suzuki Hayabusa four-cylinder powerplants.
The 75-degree V8 displaces 2.8 liters, weighs only 200 lb and puts out 400 hp at a window-rattling 10,000 rpm. Torque peaks at respectable 245 ft-lbs (at 7500 rpm!), although dyno runs for a 2.6 liter version show a fairly flat curve. Aside from boring out the 'busa block from 81mm to 83mm, none of the wide variety of performance enhancements available for the bike version have been applied to the HE V8, so it's safe to say we're nowhere near the performance limits of the design.
Hartley's diminutive V8 is produced to order, with the 2.8 liter version priced under $30,000, depending on options. Check out the Hartley Enterprises website for more details, including video of a dyno run with the engine installed in a Caterham 7.
Posted May 19th 2007 11:16AM by Stuart Waterman
If four's good, then eight must be better - that's the idea behind this jewel-like V8 engine built by Hartley Enterprises from two Suzuki Hayabusa four-cylinder powerplants.
The 75-degree V8 displaces 2.8 liters, weighs only 200 lb and puts out 400 hp at a window-rattling 10,000 rpm. Torque peaks at respectable 245 ft-lbs (at 7500 rpm!), although dyno runs for a 2.6 liter version show a fairly flat curve. Aside from boring out the 'busa block from 81mm to 83mm, none of the wide variety of performance enhancements available for the bike version have been applied to the HE V8, so it's safe to say we're nowhere near the performance limits of the design.
Hartley's diminutive V8 is produced to order, with the 2.8 liter version priced under $30,000, depending on options. Check out the Hartley Enterprises website for more details, including video of a dyno run with the engine installed in a Caterham 7.
http://www.h1v8.com
#7
engine sound
http://www.h1v8.com/f/h1.mpg
dyno video of it in a caterham 7
http://www.h1v8.com/f/dyno_mpeg_compressed.mpg
i wonder how reliable this thing is
http://www.h1v8.com/f/h1.mpg
dyno video of it in a caterham 7
http://www.h1v8.com/f/dyno_mpeg_compressed.mpg
i wonder how reliable this thing is
Trending Topics
#11
oooh i want one but damn 30k BASE price
damned thing revs like an F1 car, and they are talking about turbos!!!! itl be like the old F1 turbo days of the late 70's and early 80s!
damned thing revs like an F1 car, and they are talking about turbos!!!! itl be like the old F1 turbo days of the late 70's and early 80s!
#13
I would have thought it would sound better. Perhaps the firing order and narrow 75 degree banks result in the lackluster sound. Pretty neat engine, though.
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc
#14
I would have thought it would sound better. Perhaps the firing order and narrow 75 degree banks result in the lackluster sound. Pretty neat engine, though.
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc
#15
I would have thought it would sound better. Perhaps the firing order and narrow 75 degree banks result in the lackluster sound. Pretty neat engine, though.
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc
The 1UZ with individual throttle bodies sounds MUCH better!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba8sT2BQ4uc