Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota Tundra Buyers Prefer Bigger V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-07, 08:27 AM
  #1  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

Thread Starter
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,283
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default Toyota Tundra Buyers Prefer Bigger V8

Something I think we already knew...






PHOENIX, Ariz. — While early reports suggested that sales of the Toyota Tundra were lagging, the truck is not only gaining sales momentum, but those sales are skewing heavily in favor of the optional 5.7-liter V8 engine, reported Bob Carter, general manager of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.

Despite an environment where $3 gas is common and $4 gas is seen in Toyota regional strongholds like California and the Northeast, customers are choosing the bigger 5.7-liter engine over the truck's base V6 and optional 4.7-liter V8 engines, he said.

"All of the orders are for the 5.7-liter," Carter said. Toyota underestimated demand for the biggest available engine, which now represents 70 percent of Tundra production. The 5.7-liter engine is $950 more expensive than the 4.7-liter engine, and adds a $1,760 premium over the base V6 engine. Carter, who recently took over Toyota after heading Lexus in recent years, said that he replaced an LS 460 with a Tundra CrewMax as part of the switch. He said he loves the truck, but after getting accustomed to the LS's self-park feature, he's "having to learn how to drive again."

Carter attended a meeting with dealers in Kansas City this week, who reported strong turnout at local events designed to introduce the Tundra to Midwestern customers. In contrast to events where consumers avoid dealer representatives in an effort to check out the new hardware in peace, these shoppers were actually filling out information cards and seeking out dealer reps, Carter said.

The 5.7-liter engine provides a muscular 381 horsepower and 401 pound-feet of torque, which is a noticeable upgrade in performance and hauling capability from the 4.7's 271 hp and 313 lb-ft and the V6's 236 hp and 266 lb-ft.

EPA gas mileage is slightly worse than for the 4.7-liter V8 in 4x4 configuration, at 14 mpg city and 18 mpg highway, compared to 15/17 for the four-wheel-drive 5.7. But in 4x2 configuration, the 5.7's mileage rating rises to 16/20, while the 4.7's mileage is unchanged. Further, the V6's highway mileage rating is the same as the 2WD 5.7's, and the six-cylinder only beats the 5.7 by 1 mpg in city driving, with a 17 mpg rating.

What this means to me: Pay attention to the details because bigger engines are not always thirstier.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...cleId=120853#4
GFerg is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 08:34 AM
  #2  
kit cat
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
kit cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,571
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

having to learn how to drive again.
haha. audi'll get a kick out of this coming from a Toyota executive.
kit cat is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 09:07 AM
  #3  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,052
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

The 5.7-liter engine is $950 more expensive than the 4.7-liter engine, and adds a $1,760 premium over the base V6 engine
...
The 5.7-liter engine provides a muscular 381 horsepower and 401 pound-feet of torque, which is a noticeable upgrade in performance and hauling capability from the 4.7's 271 hp and 313 lb-ft and the V6's 236 hp and 266 lb-ft.

EPA gas mileage is slightly worse than for the 4.7-liter V8 in 4x4 configuration, at 14 mpg city and 18 mpg highway, compared to 15/17 for the four-wheel-drive 5.7. But in 4x2 configuration, the 5.7's mileage rating rises to 16/20, while the 4.7's mileage is unchanged. Further, the V6's highway mileage rating is the same as the 2WD 5.7's, and the six-cylinder only beats the 5.7 by 1 mpg in city driving, with a 17 mpg rating.
obvious reason why people want the 5.7, huge power gain, little sacrifices in fuel economy, small price difference considering the price of the truck overall. Every new tundra I've seen has been the 5.7

same reason they underestimated the IS 250/350 ratio, 350 price over 250 was an automotive bargain for the power you gain, and theres little difference in mileage

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 05-22-07 at 10:05 AM.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 11:33 AM
  #4  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,734
Received 2,405 Likes on 1,577 Posts
Default

At least Toyota was smart enough to offer the 5.7. Without it the Tundra (obviously) would not be so popular. If you're going to buy a big truck like a Tundra, you probably bought it to fill with stuff, tow, or both, and the biggest engine just makes everything work more smoothly.

Is the 4.7 a carryover from the prior Tundra? If it gets worse fuel economy, why would anyone want it?

The V6 would only make sense for the ugly 2 door.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 11:43 AM
  #5  
Pearlpower
Lexus Fanatic

iTrader: (2)
 
Pearlpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

No brainer;similar fuel economy, heck more tq/hp for only $950 bones. Why bother with the 4.7? I suspect the 4.7's will be discounted further.
Pearlpower is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 03:33 PM
  #6  
GStateOM
Lead Lap
 
GStateOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Now, instead of throwing away the 4.7, I think they should stick it in the Tacoma

I wonder if the 5.7 can fit into a Taco?
GStateOM is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 03:55 PM
  #7  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ How about update the 4.7 with Direct injection for better economy and 300hp/350+ft/lbs and yes, stick it in the Tacoma, FJ, 4Runner and yes, leave it as an option in the Tundra
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 03:56 PM
  #8  
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
MR_F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

p.s. Like bitkahuna said, leave the V6 as an option only for the 2door/regular cab
MR_F1 is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 05:38 PM
  #9  
flipside909
Lexus Connoisseur
 
flipside909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 19,801
Received 533 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

The new Tundra is selling like hotcakes here in my part of SoCal. Two of my neighbors have them in their driveways. One of them just bought it last night.
flipside909 is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 05:51 PM
  #10  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,126
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flipside909
The new Tundra is selling like hotcakes here in my part of SoCal. Two of my neighbors have them in their driveways. One of them just bought it last night.
No question, under the skin, it is indeed an excellent truck, frame and powertrain-wise (see my review). The main problem is that the skin itself (body panels, hardware, and trim), for a pickup truck, is insultingly cheap and flimsy.....about on a par with the new Ford Mustang.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-22-07, 06:16 PM
  #11  
bighitbike
Lexus Champion
 
bighitbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: washington
Posts: 2,999
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GStateOM
Now, instead of throwing away the 4.7, I think they should stick it in the Tacoma

I wonder if the 5.7 can fit into a Taco?
Or just throw it in a sedan
bighitbike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rosskoss
Car Chat
32
10-31-07 06:52 PM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
4
02-02-07 11:41 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
8
09-20-06 05:33 AM
flipside909
Car Chat
3
08-29-05 04:41 PM



Quick Reply: Toyota Tundra Buyers Prefer Bigger V8



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:57 PM.