Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Audi RS4 vs M3 part II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-07, 04:04 PM
  #16  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
and even a bigger problem is it's very easy to mod the 335 by putting in a chip and get a lot more power
with just a chip? I highly doubt it.
newr is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 04:06 PM
  #17  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newr
care to back that up?
The 0 - 60 and 1/4 mile times of the 335i are close to the M3, and the aforementioned track times from C & D of the 335i. The previous gen E46 M3 had a bigger gap between it and the top "regular" 3 Series of the day, then compared to the 335i and the E92 M3.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 04:13 PM
  #18  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vlad_Stein
Only in case of everything else being equal...
If the car is "nervous" or unstable around the track, I doubt the new owner will enjoy it as much as a better sorted out car (even if there is a minor difference in lap times between them). One example that comes to mind is the Z06, pre-rear shock change. It was very quick on the track, but everyone that drove it at C&D reported white knuckles and gastro-intestinal spasms while flogging it on the track.
Agree. I also read that article about the Z06. However, recent articles only mentioned about the steering feel being a little vague but I have not yet seen a review about the E92 M3 being 'nervous' or unstable around the track.
newr is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 05:16 PM
  #19  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newr
with just a chip? I highly doubt it.
the 335 has turbo so it's very easy to chip it and get more power. look at evo as example. good question on how much more power though. i will ask my friend who just bought the 335 and the chip tonight and see what he can show me
rominl is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 05:31 PM
  #20  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newr
with just a chip? I highly doubt it.
just talked to my friend. with the chip, it gives the car another 45-50 hp at the wheels. he said usually base is around 280hp, and with the chip it goes to 325 to 330hp (at the wheels).

that's pretty big jump in power with the chip, and i am sure it gets much closer to the m3
rominl is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 05:43 PM
  #21  
kt22cliff
Pole Position
 
kt22cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

New M3 should put out probably close to 360+ to the wheels without any mod. Assume they are about the same weight and M3 having better handling, around the track, there is no way new M3 is neck and neck with 335i. It will not be close.

Originally Posted by rominl
just talked to my friend. with the chip, it gives the car another 45-50 hp at the wheels. he said usually base is around 280hp, and with the chip it goes to 325 to 330hp (at the wheels).

that's pretty big jump in power with the chip, and i am sure it gets much closer to the m3
kt22cliff is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 06:13 PM
  #22  
OC 335d
Lexus Test Driver
 
OC 335d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just to clarify, it is not a "chip." It is a piggy back unit that intercepts the signal before it hits the ECU.
OC 335d is offline  
Old 07-18-07, 10:08 PM
  #23  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OC 335i
Just to clarify, it is not a "chip." It is a piggy back unit that intercepts the signal before it hits the ECU.
yup, sorry for the confusion.

i didn't say it will be neck to neck with the m3, but i said it's going to be very close, especially seeing how most of the reviews are not that favorable on the m3
rominl is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 12:21 AM
  #24  
92 SC400
Lead Lap
 
92 SC400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 3,593
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Nice. Gotta love that RS4. I cant wait to see how an S5 or even RS5 (if they make one) compares to this new M3...
92 SC400 is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 06:27 AM
  #25  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Dropping the hammer from a standstill, we blasted to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds, 0.4 second quicker than the previous car, with the quarter-mile dispatched in 12.9 seconds at 111 mph, an even larger, 0.7-second gain. The surface wasn’t ideal, however, and we expect even better numbers once we get an M3 to our usual test track. Even so, that’s already enough to outrun the $69,785 Audi RS 4."

The rest can be found here from C&D http://www.caranddriver.com/previews...08-bmw-m3.html
newr is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 06:56 AM
  #26  
kit cat
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
kit cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 6,571
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

slap an oilcooler to the M3 and its all good
kit cat is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 07:09 AM
  #27  
ST430
Pole Position
 
ST430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,304
Received 127 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kt22cliff
New M3 should put out probably close to 360+ to the wheels without any mod. Assume they are about the same weight and M3 having better handling, around the track.....
I think you're being a tad optimistic with your figures. On a proper "loaded" dyno (ie Mustang Dyno), the older 333hp rated m3 only registers roughly 230 hp at the wheels. I would give the e92 around 290 based on previous figures as well as reported trap speeds in the quarter mile.
ST430 is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 07:27 AM
  #28  
kt22cliff
Pole Position
 
kt22cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You are smoking crack if you think E46 m3 puts down 230something RWHP with any dyno. The idiot didn't know how to dyno M3. That 230something comes from 6000 rev limiter when you are hooked up to a dyno. There is a workaround that let you properly dyno to the real 8000 redline. Any stock E46 M3 should put out somewhere in the 270+ RWHP range.

Originally Posted by ST430
I think you're being a tad optimistic with your figures. On a proper "loaded" dyno (ie Mustang Dyno), the older 333hp rated m3 only registers roughly 230 hp at the wheels. I would give the e92 around 290 based on previous figures as well as reported trap speeds in the quarter mile.

Last edited by kt22cliff; 07-19-07 at 07:40 AM.
kt22cliff is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 09:49 AM
  #29  
ST430
Pole Position
 
ST430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,304
Received 127 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kt22cliff
You are smoking crack if you think E46 m3 puts down 230something RWHP with any dyno. The idiot didn't know how to dyno M3. That 230something comes from 6000 rev limiter when you are hooked up to a dyno. There is a workaround that let you properly dyno to the real 8000 redline. Any stock E46 M3 should put out somewhere in the 270+ RWHP range.
Have you ever dyno'd a vehicle before? Do you even know the difference between a mustang vs the typical dynojet (which i hope you're citing)? Better yet, do you have actual data to back up your claims, besides mere postulations?

Fyi - the m3s were dyno'd properly and ran the appropriate ets and traps for its given measurements.
ST430 is offline  
Old 07-19-07, 10:02 AM
  #30  
ST430
Pole Position
 
ST430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,304
Received 127 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Fyi - here's a dyno plot of my evo modified (350whp) overlayed with its stock numbers (211whp, albeit rated 289hp by the factory). Parasitic drivetrain loss combined with properly loaded (and calibrated) mustang dyno figures will make people think twice about what they really put down in power:

ST430 is offline  


Quick Reply: Audi RS4 vs M3 part II



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 AM.