Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Acura NSX VS Ferrari 348 VS Porsche 911!!! WHICH ONE WOULD YOU TAKE????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-07 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
1992 SC300's Avatar
1992 SC300
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: or
Default Acura NSX VS Ferrari 348 VS Porsche 911!!! WHICH ONE WOULD YOU TAKE????

OK so here are the specs on the cars:

1. 1997 Acura NSX
290 Hp
224 ft-lbs TQ
Mid-Engine, Rear wheel drive
0-60 in 5.8 Sec
6 Speed
3.2L V6

VS

2. 1990 Ferrari 348
300 HP
229 ft-lbs TQ
Mid-Engine, Rear wheel drive
0-60 in 6.0 Sec
5 Speed
3.4L V8

VS

3. 1996 Porsche 911
282 HP
250 ft-lbs TQ
Rear engine, Rear wheel drive
0-60 in 5.3 Sec
6 Speed
3.6L H6
Old 08-11-07 | 01:37 PM
  #2  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 80
From: CA
Default

Acura NSX for me.

Porsche are a dime in a dozen here in socal.

The ferarri 348 is a bit dated for my taste. I'm sure it's a badass car though.
Old 08-11-07 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,120
Likes: 226
From: Canada
Default

The 348 is a little old, always love it though, I would take the NSX out of the 3.
Old 08-11-07 | 02:41 PM
  #4  
rai's Avatar
rai
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

I would take a near-new Cayman or Cayman S.
Old 08-11-07 | 02:48 PM
  #5  
Woogie's Avatar
Woogie
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Default

I'd take the NSX.
Old 08-11-07 | 03:18 PM
  #6  
Solo_D33A's Avatar
Solo_D33A
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 1
From: Richmond
Default

NSX, it'll rust less than the other two. lol
Old 08-11-07 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
maz's Avatar
maz
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Ferrari for me. Sure its old but its a Ferrari and it looks great.
Old 08-11-07 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

NSX please.... though I do have a weak spot for the 348.
Old 08-11-07 | 03:28 PM
  #9  
thetopdog's Avatar
thetopdog
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by rai
I would take a near-new Cayman or Cayman S.
I agree, although I'd take a Vette instead . Performance has increased so much over the past 10-15 years that it's almost not worth it to get an old 'exotic' like a 911, NSX or 348 when you can get a brand new car that is MUCH more reliable, much faster, and even better looking. About the only reason to get an older exotic is rarity and the 911 and NSX aren't rare at all
Old 08-11-07 | 03:58 PM
  #10  
AJ's Avatar
AJ
Lexus Champion
CL Folding 10,000
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
From: International
Default

Ferrari in a heartbeat !
Old 08-11-07 | 04:04 PM
  #11  
pvmike1's Avatar
pvmike1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 5
From: California
Default

Not a fair comparison.

The 348 is crap. It shouldn't even be in this discussion. The much improved 355 is a better candidate.

The NA2 NSX is much faster than listed. You listed numbers for an NA1 NSX with the 3.0 engine and 5 speed, and conservative numbers at that.

The 993, though loved by purists, has an extremely outdated interior. I think the 996 is a better choice.

If the 348, NA2 NSX and 993 are your choices, then it's not even close. NSX.

A better discussion would be 355 vs. NA2 NSX vs. 996.
Old 08-11-07 | 04:07 PM
  #12  
emoshun's Avatar
emoshun
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 1
From: Cali
Default

How can you say no to this Italian beauty?
Old 08-11-07 | 04:12 PM
  #13  
1992 SC300's Avatar
1992 SC300
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: or
Default

Originally Posted by pvmike1
Not a fair comparison.

The 348 is crap. It shouldn't even be in this discussion. The much improved 355 is a better candidate.

The NA2 NSX is much faster than listed. You listed numbers for an NA1 NSX with the 3.0 engine and 5 speed, and conservative numbers at that.

The 993, though loved by purists, has an extremely outdated interior. I think the 996 is a better choice.

If the 348, NA2 NSX and 993 are your choices, then it's not even close. NSX.

A better discussion would be 355 vs. NA2 NSX vs. 996.
The numbers I have are from the NA2 NSX.... Please read them again and you will see.
355 is in a whole diffrent price range thats why I am not comparing it. It is from $70-$90K and the 348 is $40-$55K NSX $35-$45 and 993 is $35-$45. Thats why I am comparing these cars and not vettes (not that I would buy one).
Old 08-11-07 | 04:13 PM
  #14  
1992 SC300's Avatar
1992 SC300
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: or
Default

And by the way those arent conservative numbers......
Get real NSX is NOT thats fast, its a exotic looking S2000.
Old 08-11-07 | 04:24 PM
  #15  
Baby ///M3's Avatar
Baby ///M3
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 21
From: California
Default

If reliability and maintenance cost are not taken in consideration, the Ferrari 348. It will continue to hold its value despite being a so so performer.

It's the image that counts.

Let's face it, most of us don't buy a Ferrari to drag race on the street anyway.

Jon


Quick Reply: Acura NSX VS Ferrari 348 VS Porsche 911!!! WHICH ONE WOULD YOU TAKE????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM.