Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

BMW M-Series Engine Output

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-07 | 06:30 AM
  #61  
DASHOCKER's Avatar
DASHOCKER
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,191
Likes: 10
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by LexT
+1....
Carbon build up issue is the reason I got rid of my E39 M5 I bought it with 26K miles and @39K miles it had carbon build up.... I was like wtf....
When did you get rid of the M5 Taran? Now your sporting a 540 sport pack! What are you getting next week? See you soon..
Old 10-22-07 | 12:52 PM
  #62  
RON430's Avatar
RON430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by LexT
+1....
Carbon build up issue is the reason I got rid of my E39 M5 I bought it with 26K miles and @39K miles it had carbon build up.... I was like wtf....
Man, M motors aren't the only ones susceptible to this. I can't remember how many "campaigns" I went through with bimmers twenty years ago for carbon buildup. Religious use of the bimmer gas additive, until I found out RedLine was just as good, kept them running well enough. They always said it was US gas, which I didn't have much problem believing. In hindsight a couple of "burning the gunk out" tickets might have been more worthwhile.
Old 10-22-07 | 01:07 PM
  #63  
RON430's Avatar
RON430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by greyBLITZ

I'd hate to start up the fire again, I would appreciate if this thread was kept clean and helpful not only to myself, but to all members. In any case, what are some of the things (fuel economy, reliability, cost, weight, curves, NVH) that the M's have sacrificed in order to gain such high output? And to what extent have they compromised them? I mean, how badly does fuel economy suffer? Which aspects of the design have an impact on it? etc.

Bimmers engineering tries to not make compromises in drivability vs performance in the output of the motor. The double VANOS is an example of that. Inevitably, it is a difficult tradeoff to make. Obviously cost and complexity suffer. Please note that complexity does not necessarily mean less reliable. It just means there are more bits that have to not only function but function within tight specs for the engine to have its performance potential realized. The comment about carbon buildup applies to any high performance engine and/or poor gasoline. Fuel injection and double VANOS try to make an engine that is happy at low part throttle but inevitably the timing and heat range of the spark plugs are tuned more for the high end than the low end. And hence the engines tend to carbon foul if you don't regularly get them up to temperature and really let them burn at WOT. Pretty difficult to do in the US.

Gas mileage? We don't care about no stinking gas mileage. Seriously, one of the British car mags tested the new M3 and I believe that over their testing period they averaged 13mpg. And that is with imperial gallons. Even their editor made a comment in his column about the potential step backward in this regard. There are some other performance tricks such as reducing vehicle weight (think Lotus Elise) and gearing to keep low end performance and try to get better highway mileage but inevitably the physics takes over. These are basically heat cycle engines and making 400 or 500 hp is going to take a given amount of fuel to release the heat to make that level of hp, and with todays fuel injections, variable timing, and electronic mixture control, there aren't many places to achieve a breakthrough.
Old 10-22-07 | 06:48 PM
  #64  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
All cars (especially first year cars) have issues - and as I've said, the more tech in the car, the more issues. Alas, you and your buddies (TRD, Och, etc.) love to make BMWs sound like they have tons of issues - alas, even at #18 they are still more reliable than average and yes, BMWs have more technology.

So do BMW have more issues than Lexus - yes, but please quit with the all BMWs have "major issues" campaign - you do a disservice to people like the OP and when they find out you are wrong, they no longer trust your posts.
sure they do, but we are jumpin on every Toyota/Lexus issue here, why we should be forgiving BMW? Right now 335i has many different "common" problems, and check what drivers of IS350 report as common problem (1st year models too) - definetly not overheating, fuel pumps, trannies, ecu's, etc, etc.

It seems it is fine to jump on Lexus if there is an issue, but reality is that it has A LOT less issues than other premium brands, and there is no need to cover that up.
Old 10-22-07 | 07:16 PM
  #65  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by RON430
Gas mileage? We don't care about no stinking gas mileage. .
A little off-topic, maybe, but let's see how long you feel that way after crude gets to $100 a barrel (it's headed that way now) and pump prices catch up.
Old 10-22-07 | 07:58 PM
  #66  
doug_999's Avatar
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
sure they do, but we are jumpin on every Toyota/Lexus issue here, why we should be forgiving BMW? Right now 335i has many different "common" problems, and check what drivers of IS350 report as common problem (1st year models too) - definetly not overheating, fuel pumps, trannies, ecu's, etc, etc.

It seems it is fine to jump on Lexus if there is an issue, but reality is that it has A LOT less issues than other premium brands, and there is no need to cover that up.
Wait - you are confusing the thread with the Lexus Crashes in Reliability rankings thread. Which I have to say, Ron had an incredible response to..... it is below for everyone's enjoyment..

Originally Posted by RON430
..... I will say that yes it is fair to criticize Toyota and not other manufacturers. Why? Because I have come to expect more from Toyota and that is what makes this slide something that Toyota/Lexus would do well to not ignore. If someone puts a post up about a bimmer engine grenading or iDrive horror story or have mercedes electronics that are now their own life form it wouldn't make much impact on me. But Toyota/Lexus sliding out of the position that, let's admit it, they have had a lock on, is not a good sign. If I want marvelous handling and steering and an infuriating bit of technotrash iDrive system, I will get a bimmer. If I want big snob appeal and huge horsepower I will get a MBZ or AMG. Just examples, please don't get sidetracked by the point I am making. Lexus doesn't have inspiring handling. Doesn't have anywhere near class leading performance. And they don't seem very interested in doing much about it. But what I do expect is to have the best reliability out there and, as has been pointed out, look at some of the boards about recent models here to review the problems people are seeing with increasing frequency. When you take reliability out of the equation, the Lexus purchase decision becomes a lot less compelling.
Old 10-22-07 | 07:59 PM
  #67  
doug_999's Avatar
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
A little off-topic, maybe, but let's see how long you feel that way after crude gets to $100 a barrel (it's headed that way now) and pump prices catch up.
Uh, I think he was joking - I know for a fact it is Ron's mind as he looks at new cars.....especially considering he lives in a state with some of the highest gas prices....
Old 10-22-07 | 11:34 PM
  #68  
RON430's Avatar
RON430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Thanks for the kind words guys but I was really trying to address the mindset of M, AMG, Audi S and RS, et al. When you are jamming 400, 500, or 600 hp into a car, it is extremely difficult to be too concerned about mileage. In all honesty, my opinion is that the buyer of a bimmer M, AMG, or Audi RS isn't very concerned about mileage. That isn't to say that BMW in particular isn't trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat with some impressive engine tech that churns out big hp but is still very efficient but there are some difficult rules to break and, as I said, it just takes the gas to make the hp. Inevitably it seems like everyone throws some very low OD gear in the tranny to let the vehicle drop down to low revs at US highway speed but that isn't a great way to keep the carbon out.

Gas prices in Cali high? Really, back to putting $50 fillups in the GS. It is fascinating to watch the Germans in particular where the big hp gas engines and high tech diesels are both available. I know this thread is about the M motors but I wonder if the technology in the M motors is more advanced than bimmers diesel technology? MBZ, Audi, and bimmer have made some extremely impressive advances here. I believe I respect that easily as much as what they do with the big hp gas engines. Sorry for getting off topic.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34
Car Chat
3
11-18-11 07:20 PM
JessePS
Car Chat
1
05-08-09 11:11 PM
Lexwang07
Car Chat
6
05-03-09 08:18 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 AM.