Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Will the next Supra have the GT-R as its benchmark?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-07 | 06:54 AM
  #16  
Koma's Avatar
Koma
Moderator
CL Folding 25,000
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
If Toyota does try to go for a green hybrid Supra thing then it will not be able to touch the Skyline aside from maybe a quick zero to sixty sprint by which it will have exerted its instant torque advantage from the batteries and will be just towing a bunch of dead weight and operating at 60% power for any kind of long distance runs or track/course use. I don't know why Toyota would put a hybrid in a sports car but that seems the route they are going if they do it, sometimes being different is not good and hybrids are extremely poor choices for sports cars.
Google up the Supra HV-R. Instead of batteries it uses lightweight capacitors that recharge quickly and weigh less than lithium ion batteries. I think this technology could be used with a sports car in mind. I don't, however, think it'll help much at all with getting fuel consumption.
Old 01-01-08 | 09:02 PM
  #17  
Stelth91's Avatar
Stelth91
Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

Just take the IS-F drivetrain, throw in a 6 speed manual, tune it, and get a sporty looking body and sell the car for $50k.
Old 01-01-08 | 09:20 PM
  #18  
Shawnmack's Avatar
Shawnmack
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 10
From: Charlotte
Default

Originally Posted by Stelth91
Just take the IS-F drivetrain, throw in a 6 speed manual, tune it, and get a sporty looking body and sell the car for $50k.
Exactly do the same thing Nissan done with the G and Z car. It don't have to be 50k.
Make it on the same platform as the IS with a 6-speed manual or a 8-speed auto. Use the IS-f suspension and sell it between 35-40k. That would bring a lot of 25 to 35 year old males to the show room floor.
Old 01-01-08 | 09:27 PM
  #19  
DIrEctQL's Avatar
DIrEctQL
Chicago Lexus Club Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 9
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Shawnmack
Exactly do the same thing Nissan done with the G and Z car. It don't have to be 50k.
Make it on the same platform as the IS with a 6-speed manual or a 8-speed auto. Use the IS-f suspension and sell it between 35-40k. That would bring a lot of 25 to 35 year old males to the show room floor.
That would suck. The fact the car would be a V8 would make it harder and more expansive to modify than a turbo car.
Old 01-01-08 | 09:40 PM
  #20  
Shawnmack's Avatar
Shawnmack
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 10
From: Charlotte
Default

Originally Posted by DIrEctQL
That would suck. The fact the car would be a V8 would make it harder and more expansive to modify than a turbo car.
Cuz what are you talking about the IS don't have no V-8. The Z don't have a V-8 and I've seen a ton of them modified.
Old 01-01-08 | 10:35 PM
  #21  
MoLexus's Avatar
MoLexus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

I say just put as much R&D into the LF-A and target Aston Martin, Ferrari, AMG, etc. and see how the market reacts. They are bound to get a piece of the market share and from the way it appears they aren't having problems in any other line.
Old 01-01-08 | 11:41 PM
  #22  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,274
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by DIrEctQL
That would suck. The fact the car would be a V8 would make it harder and more expansive to modify than a turbo car.
I think a highly tuned v8 would be very good, it would be the first v8 powered Japanese sports car and would get tons of respect. Toyota does not have any 6 cylinders that would be good to turbo as they no longer make an inline six and their current 6 cylinders are aluminum v6 that are not good candidates for FI. The only 6 cylinder that would make a good turbo engine would be either a brand new inline 6 or flat 6 strengthed for FI or to use the Subaru flat 6 as they have been talking of sharing parts with Subaru. They could turbo a v-8 which would be the best of both worlds but Toyota is way to conservative to do something like that.
Old 01-01-08 | 11:42 PM
  #23  
CantSeeMe's Avatar
CantSeeMe
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by sleeper408
I've read rumors that the next Supra if they do decide to build it, will probably use the 3.5L V6 from the GS and IS350 and tuned to produce around 350hp. It will also be N/A. I can't recall the source that I read this from but all they had along with the article were some rough sketches. Does anybody else here read that same article? It might have been from a R&T article earlier this year.

IMO, Even if its tuned to produce 350HP or even 400HP. It will be a mistake for Toyota to offer an MK-V Supra that doesnt have a turbo option.
Lets face it, The F & F generation will need to be Toyotas primary target audience .....And they will expect to see a turbo.
Old 01-01-08 | 11:50 PM
  #24  
CK6Speed's Avatar
CK6Speed
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 4
From: HI
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
I think a highly tuned v8 would be very good, it would be the first v8 powered Japanese sports car and would get tons of respect. Toyota does not have any 6 cylinders that would be good to turbo as they no longer make an inline six and their current 6 cylinders are aluminum v6 that are not good candidates for FI. The only 6 cylinder that would make a good turbo engine would be either a brand new inline 6 or flat 6 strengthed for FI or to use the Subaru flat 6 as they have been talking of sharing parts with Subaru. They could turbo a v-8 which would be the best of both worlds but Toyota is way to conservative to do something like that.
You have to remember what really put the Supra (Mainly the MK4) on the map was its seemingly ealy and cheap performance enhancement. You could pull a vaccum hose line and pretty much gain 100 HP by increasing the boost. Comapred to the cost to turbocharge a V8 the I6 in the Supra seems cheap. If you go the V8 Turbocharge route, not only will the initial cost be higher, but the performance enhancement cost also goes up making it less desireable. Cars like the LF-A, Ferrari, NSX R8 and those that attempt to compete in that class can get away with high initial cost and high aftermerket cost because those cars aren't really meant for aftermarket tuning (At least cheaply). Cars like the Supra, RX-7, GT-R and such are meant for the tunner crowed especially if you are talking about keeping the cost around $40K that some here are wanting.
Old 01-02-08 | 12:04 AM
  #25  
mikemareen's Avatar
mikemareen
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 1
From: southern cali, san gabriel valley
Default

toyota really needs something to compete with the 350z and Infiniti G coupe.

it just needs a killer 2 door coupe in the 30 to 35 thousand range. The solara is just not cutting it and the SC430 is a convertible and out of the price range.

The infiniti G coupe has basically monopolized the mid priced sports luxury coupe market.
Old 01-02-08 | 09:55 AM
  #26  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 228
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
I think a highly tuned v8 would be very good, it would be the first v8 powered Japanese sports car and would get tons of respect. Toyota does not have any 6 cylinders that would be good to turbo as they no longer make an inline six and their current 6 cylinders are aluminum v6 that are not good candidates for FI. The only 6 cylinder that would make a good turbo engine would be either a brand new inline 6 or flat 6 strengthed for FI or to use the Subaru flat 6 as they have been talking of sharing parts with Subaru. They could turbo a v-8 which would be the best of both worlds but Toyota is way to conservative to do something like that.
The current GTR is a aluminum v6 bi-turbo design and produced 480hp. You don't think Toyota could engineer its GR series to match?
Old 01-02-08 | 10:14 AM
  #27  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,364
Likes: 168
From: so cal
Default

Originally Posted by MoLexus
I say just put as much R&D into the LF-A and target Aston Martin, Ferrari, AMG, etc. and see how the market reacts. They are bound to get a piece of the market share and from the way it appears they aren't having problems in any other line.
Yes, but the LF-A is the $100k+ market, not a big market.

a sub $50k is a much bigger market (and hopefully that's what the
Full Time High School will be filling)

I agree that the z/G35 basically owns that segment now.
Old 01-02-08 | 11:08 PM
  #28  
MoLexus's Avatar
MoLexus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by GS3Tek
Yes, but the LF-A is the $100k+ market, not a big market.

a sub $50k is a much bigger market (and hopefully that's what the
Full Time High School will be filling)

I agree that the z/G35 basically owns that segment now.
Yea but the only way they can own the Z/G35 segment is by making a hybrid because they can't shift away from being green. I just don't think Lexus should interfere with that market, for an example the past MR2 was a joke FROM THE FACTORY but it had alot of aftermarket potential.
Old 01-03-08 | 12:36 AM
  #29  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,274
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
The current GTR is a aluminum v6 bi-turbo design and produced 480hp. You don't think Toyota could engineer its GR series to match?
Nissan spent a very long time and alot of money to get the V6 to reliably handle the power, several years, I believe they sent it to Cosworth to tune it and help with handling the power. They were having problems all along as the engine was not well suited for FI and not able to handle the power reliably and were debating whether to use the Infiniti v8 in higher tune especially for the American market. It is still not certain as to whether this will be a reliable powerplant and it is pretty much certain it won't be able to handle the aftermarket high hp tuning like the last cast iron I6.

I don't think Toyota would go through all the trouble to get their engines to be able to handle the horsepower as they just are not interested in performance cars anymore, only sales numbers and how practical all the effort is and whether its going to pay off. They would much rather just build another SUV, crossover, pickup to fill another small gap in their already ridiculous crowded lineup of SUVs, crossovers, and trucks and it will be bought in droves from the masses who are not interested in high performance sports cars.
Old 01-03-08 | 01:03 AM
  #30  
MoLexus's Avatar
MoLexus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
It is still not certain as to whether this will be a reliable powerplant and it is pretty much certain it won't be able to handle the aftermarket high hp tuning like the last cast iron I6.

.

I read that the ECU looks out if it senses a mod. I guess it all makes sense now.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 AM.