Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Nissan To Cut Vehicle Weight By 15% To Lift Fuel Efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-08 | 11:42 PM
  #1  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up Nissan To Cut Vehicle Weight By 15% To Lift Fuel Efficiency

Great move Nissan! I hope others follow.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/i..._420814_6.html

HONG KONG -- Nissan Motor Co. will cut the weight of its vehicles by an average of 15% over the next seven years as it seeks to improve fuel efficiency, according to reports. The weight reduction will be gauged against the automaker's 2005 model year, the Nikkei business daily reported Wednesday. Nissan will seek to trim the weight by rethinking vehicle design, using light weight materials and encouraging parts suppliers to also pursue the new efficiency targets.
Old 01-03-08 | 11:52 PM
  #2  
CK6Speed's Avatar
CK6Speed
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,719
Likes: 4
From: HI
Default

Hmm, I'm kind of lukewarm on this one yet. I like the fact they are reducing weight, but just when Infiniti is finally starting to have some really good quality cars in and out with good fit and finish, I just hope they don't cut the weight by lowering the quality of the materials or cutting corners like they did a few years earlier. I guess we will have to wait and see where they loose the weight.
Old 01-04-08 | 12:49 AM
  #3  
92 SC400's Avatar
92 SC400
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 5
From: CA
Default

Nice! I'd like to see the G coupe and Z weigh 15% less but as mentioned, hopefully not at the cost of quality!
Old 01-04-08 | 08:13 AM
  #4  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,719
Likes: 90
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

I understand the benefits of weight reduction in peformance and gas mileage, but there is a downside to it, too. All else equal (which, of course, it rarely is), a lighter vehicle means a stiffer ride, less crash protection in an impact with a heavier vehicle, less stability, and more susceptability to being blown around by crosswinds. It could, depending on design, also mean less-durable parts.
Old 01-04-08 | 08:30 AM
  #5  
Koma's Avatar
Koma
Moderator
CL Folding 25,000
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 1
From: Massachusetts
Default

It's a step towards lower fuel consumption.
Old 01-04-08 | 10:24 AM
  #6  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,364
Likes: 168
From: so cal
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I understand the benefits of weight reduction in peformance and gas mileage, but there is a downside to it, too. All else equal (which, of course, it rarely is), a lighter vehicle means a stiffer ride, less crash protection in an impact with a heavier vehicle, less stability, and more susceptability to being blown around by crosswinds. It could, depending on design, also mean less-durable parts.
That's the bigger concern. Wasn't it the maxima that already had a bad crash rating???

I don't like the way how their doors feel when they close-so flimsy
Old 01-04-08 | 06:12 PM
  #7  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As for crash protection, I think it will make engineers think of innovative ways to make a lightweight car safe.
Old 01-05-08 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
Nextourer's Avatar
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 3
From: none
Default

lighter != less crashworthiness. This is true especially if the lighter material is as stronger, if not stronger, than the material it replaces.

Case in point: ultra high tensile steel vs. high tensile steel.
Old 01-05-08 | 07:43 PM
  #9  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,719
Likes: 90
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
As for crash protection, I think it will make engineers think of innovative ways to make a lightweight car safe.
Well, of course, a lighter car, (all other things equal) will generally have better manuverability, stop quicker, react faster, and thus be more likely to avoid a crash in the first place. But if it DOES hit something, it will be less resistant to structural damage.
Old 01-05-08 | 11:41 PM
  #10  
ElitistK's Avatar
ElitistK
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

about time. my friend's g37 weighs as much as my car.
Old 01-06-08 | 06:45 PM
  #11  
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OrkwdshZkv0

Don't assume the bigger heavier car is the safer car. This video shows a Volvo (safe car right?) crashing into a tiny car. Guess what happens?

It's more about design and engineering.
Old 01-10-08 | 03:20 PM
  #12  
toy4two's Avatar
toy4two
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

hey the Z and G coupe are porkers, the G37 is absolutley disgusting! Losing 15% of 3600 lbs+ isn't going to hurt any stability or make it less crash worthy, etc, that is what they should have been to begin with.
Old 01-10-08 | 03:40 PM
  #13  
blacksc400's Avatar
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,143
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas!
Default

Weight is the worst enemy!! go for it...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bagwell
Car Chat
6
06-06-14 04:16 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
52
08-24-09 04:25 PM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
4
11-16-06 06:30 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
11
06-06-06 08:10 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 PM.